First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.
Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.
Question 1Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
In project knowledge management, which term describes the documented, codified knowledge that can be stored and retrieved from a repository?
- Implicit assumption
- Latent knowledge
- Explicit knowledge Correct answer.
- Tacit knowledge
Explanation
Explicit knowledge is knowledge that has been articulated, recorded, and stored so it can be shared through documents, databases, or procedures. Tacit knowledge, by contrast, resides in people's experience and is hard to formalize or transfer directly.
Question 2Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A lessons-learned register captures which type of project knowledge?
- The approved budget baseline for the current phase
- The list of stakeholders with decision authority
- Knowledge gained from past experience that can inform future work Correct answer.
- The contractual penalties for late delivery
Explanation
A lessons-learned register records insights from experience-what worked, what failed, and why-so that future projects can reuse that knowledge. Budget baselines, penalties, and authority lists are reference data, not experiential learning.
Question 3Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which activity best illustrates knowledge transfer through socialization?
- Archiving a closed project's final report
- Reading a lessons-learned database entry
- Publishing a written procedure on the intranet
- A senior engineer mentoring a junior colleague while working side by side Correct answer.
Explanation
Socialization transfers tacit knowledge through direct interaction, observation, and shared experience, as in mentoring or apprenticeship. The other options move codified knowledge through documents and repositories, which is explicit-to-explicit transfer.
Question 4Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
What is the primary purpose of a knowledge management plan in a project?
- To schedule the project's quality audits
- To define how knowledge will be captured, shared, and reused across the project Correct answer.
- To allocate contingency reserves
- To document the procurement strategy
Explanation
A knowledge management plan sets out the approach, responsibilities, tools, and timing for capturing, sharing, and reusing knowledge. Quality audits, procurement strategy, and reserve allocation belong to other management plans.
Question 5Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
In a project information management system, metadata applied to documents is most useful for which purpose?
- Replacing the need for document approval
- Enabling search, retrieval, and version control of records Correct answer.
- Encrypting the contents of each document
- Reducing the storage cost of the repository
Explanation
Metadata such as author, date, version, and classification makes documents findable and supports retrieval and version control. It does not encrypt content, substitute for approvals, or by itself lower storage costs.
Question 6Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which document typically authorizes the project manager to apply organizational resources to project activities?
- Work breakdown structure
- Business case
- Stakeholder register
- Project charter Correct answer.
Explanation
The project charter formally authorizes the project and gives the project manager authority to commit organizational resources. The business case justifies the investment, while the register and WBS are planning artifacts.
Question 7Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project team adopts a shared wiki so that members can update procedures as they change. This best supports which knowledge management goal?
- Eliminating the need for lessons learned
- Reducing the project scope
- Increasing the number of stakeholders
- Keeping codified knowledge current and accessible Correct answer.
Explanation
A shared wiki lets contributors maintain codified knowledge so it stays current and reachable by the team. It does not change stakeholder counts or scope, and it complements rather than replaces lessons learned.
Question 8Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which of the following is an example of organizational process assets relevant to knowledge management?
- The project's risk register
- The project team's colocated workspace
- The customer's product specification
- Historical project archives and lessons-learned repositories Correct answer.
Explanation
Organizational process assets are the organization's existing processes, templates, and knowledge stores, including historical archives and lessons-learned repositories. A workspace, customer specification, and risk register are project-specific or external inputs.
Question 9Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
During execution, a team discovers a faster testing approach. According to knowledge management practice, what should happen first?
- Wait until project closure to mention it
- File the discovery only in the individual's personal notes
- Capture the approach and assess whether it should be shared with other teams Correct answer.
- Immediately rewrite the project schedule without review
Explanation
Knowledge should be captured when it is generated, then evaluated for reuse so other teams can benefit before the opportunity is lost. Deferring to closure or keeping it private undermines organizational learning, and schedule changes require proper review.
Question 10Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project manager wants to convert tacit knowledge held by subject matter experts into explicit knowledge. Which technique is most appropriate?
- A resource histogram of team workload
- A cost-benefit analysis of the project
- Structured interviews that elicit and record expert reasoning Correct answer.
- A procurement bid evaluation
Explanation
Structured interviews draw out and document the reasoning and experience of experts, converting tacit knowledge into explicit form. Cost-benefit analysis, resource histograms, and bid evaluations serve other management purposes.
Question 11Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which situation most clearly indicates a breakdown in project information management?
- Two teams rely on different versions of the same requirements document Correct answer.
- A project uses a shared calendar for milestones
- A manager reviews a report before distribution
- A team holds a weekly status meeting
Explanation
Conflicting versions of the same document signal weak version control and poor information management, which can cause rework and errors. Meetings, shared calendars, and report reviews are normal practices that support, not undermine, information management.
Question 12Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
What distinguishes a knowledge base from a document library in project information management?
- A knowledge base never requires maintenance
- A knowledge base can only hold numerical data
- A document library cannot be searched
- A knowledge base is structured for retrieval and reuse of answers, not just storage of files Correct answer.
Explanation
A knowledge base organizes content so users can retrieve answers and reuse knowledge, whereas a document library primarily stores files. Both can be searched, both need maintenance, and neither is limited to numerical data.
Question 13Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project closes and the manager must decide what to archive. Which set should be retained as project records?
- Superseded draft schedules with no approval
- Approved baselines, final reports, and acceptance documentation Correct answer.
- Personal to-do lists of the project manager
- Draft emails between team members about lunch
Explanation
Project records should preserve approved baselines, final reports, and acceptance documentation because they evidence what was agreed and delivered. Personal notes, casual messages, and unapproved drafts are not authoritative records.
Question 14Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which practice best protects confidential project information while still enabling team collaboration?
- Removing all access controls to speed retrieval
- Storing sensitive files on personal devices only
- Emailing all documents to every stakeholder
- Applying classification labels and role-based access to shared repositories Correct answer.
Explanation
Classification labels combined with role-based access let the right people reach information while restricting sensitive content. Broadcasting to everyone, removing controls, or using personal devices increases exposure and risk.
Question 15Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
In the SECI model of knowledge conversion, which mode describes converting explicit knowledge into new explicit knowledge, such as combining reports into a consolidated analysis?
- Externalization
- Combination Correct answer.
- Internalization
- Socialization
Explanation
Combination is the mode in which explicit knowledge is reorganized, combined, and codified into new explicit forms such as consolidated reports. Socialization, externalization, and internalization involve tacit knowledge in different ways.
Question 16Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A lessons-learned session is scheduled immediately after a major milestone. What is the main advantage of this timing over waiting until project closure?
- It reduces the number of stakeholders involved
- It removes the need for a final project report
- It guarantees the project will not repeat mistakes
- The knowledge can be applied to remaining project work before it ends Correct answer.
Explanation
Capturing lessons at a milestone lets the team adjust current work while there is still time to benefit. It does not eliminate final reporting, guarantee error-free work, or change stakeholder involvement.
Question 17Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which element of a knowledge management plan assigns accountability for capturing and validating knowledge?
- The list of approved software licenses
- The project's color scheme for reports
- Defined roles and responsibilities for knowledge activities Correct answer.
- The contingency reserve amount
Explanation
Clear roles and responsibilities ensure someone owns capturing, reviewing, and validating knowledge so it is trustworthy. Visual design, software licenses, and reserve amounts do not establish knowledge accountability.
Question 18Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A team maintains a decision log throughout the project. What is its main knowledge management value?
- It replaces the need for a risk register
- It records what was decided, why, and by whom, preserving rationale for future reference Correct answer.
- It lists every task the team performs
- It serves as the project's cost baseline
Explanation
A decision log captures the decision, its rationale, and the decision maker, which preserves context that would otherwise be lost. It does not substitute for a risk register, cost baseline, or task list.
Question 19Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which action best demonstrates applying knowledge from a previous project to a new one?
- Ignoring prior archives to avoid bias
- Reviewing prior lessons learned and adjusting the new project's risk plan accordingly Correct answer.
- Copying the previous project's schedule without modification
- Reusing the previous project charter unchanged
Explanation
Reuse means consulting prior lessons and adapting current plans, such as the risk plan, to reflect that knowledge. Copying artifacts unchanged or ignoring archives fails to apply knowledge appropriately.
Question 20Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project manager must choose a repository for fast-changing technical knowledge shared by a distributed team. Which requirement matters most?
- Support for concurrent editing with version history Correct answer.
- A fixed annual storage quota
- A single-language interface
- Offline-only access
Explanation
Fast-changing knowledge shared across locations requires concurrent editing and version history so contributions stay coordinated and changes are traceable. A fixed quota, single-language interface, or offline-only access would hinder rather than enable this.
Question 21Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Which statement best explains why tacit knowledge is difficult to manage through information systems alone?
- It is embedded in experience and context, so it resists full codification Correct answer.
- It exists only in written documents
- It is always confidential and cannot be discussed
- It changes too slowly to be recorded
Explanation
Tacit knowledge is tied to personal experience and context, making it hard to fully capture in systems; it usually transfers through interaction and practice. It is not inherently confidential, is not confined to documents, and is not defined by slow change.
Question 22Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
An organization wants to measure whether its knowledge management effort is effective. Which indicator is most meaningful?
- The number of documents stored in the repository
- The rate at which captured lessons are reused in later projects Correct answer.
- The count of user accounts created
- The total hours spent in meetings
Explanation
Effectiveness is shown by whether knowledge is actually reused and improves outcomes, not by volume metrics. Document counts, meeting hours, and account numbers measure activity or storage rather than the value derived from knowledge.
Question 23Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Two departments interpret the same governance policy differently, causing inconsistent reporting. What is the most appropriate knowledge management response?
- Let each department continue its own interpretation
- Clarify the policy's intent with the owners and publish an authoritative interpretation Correct answer.
- Delete the policy to remove the conflict
- Escalate every future report for manual correction
Explanation
Ambiguity in a shared policy is resolved by confirming intent with the policy owners and issuing an authoritative interpretation that everyone can reference. Allowing divergent readings, deleting the policy, or relying on perpetual manual correction perpetuates the inconsistency.
Question 24Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project manager inherits a repository full of unlabeled, duplicated files. Which sequence best restores its knowledge management value?
- Add more files before organizing existing ones
- Delete all content and start over without review
- Classify and deduplicate content, then define ownership and maintenance rules Correct answer.
- Restrict access to everyone until files are organized
Explanation
Restoring value requires first classifying and removing duplicates, then assigning ownership and maintenance rules so the repository stays reliable. Adding more unmanaged content, blanket restriction, or unreviewed deletion damages usability or loses records.
Question 25Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
Why does a knowledge management approach that relies only on storing documents often fail to improve performance?
- It captures explicit artifacts but neglects the tacit, contextual knowledge people need to apply them Correct answer.
- It eliminates the need for human judgment
- It stores too much tacit knowledge in databases
- It prevents any explicit knowledge from being recorded
Explanation
Document-centric approaches preserve explicit artifacts but often omit the tacit context and experience required to interpret and apply them, so performance may not improve. They do not store tacit knowledge well, do not block explicit recording, and cannot remove the need for judgment.
Question 26Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
In a project knowledge management plan, what is the primary purpose of defining a knowledge taxonomy?
- To replace the project schedule with a list of knowledge deliverables
- To determine the cost baseline for information technology procurement
- To assign formal approval authority over the project charter
- To classify and index project knowledge assets so they can be retrieved consistently Correct answer.
Explanation
A taxonomy provides a shared classification scheme so that knowledge assets such as lessons, templates, and technical notes are tagged and found consistently across the project and organization. It supports retrieval and reuse rather than scheduling, budgeting, or authorizing the project. Without a taxonomy, repositories tend to accumulate unlabeled content that cannot be reliably searched.
Question 27Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project manager needs to capture the reasoning behind a significant technical trade-off so future teams can understand why the chosen option was selected. Which project artifact is most appropriate?
- A risk register entry recording the residual risk rating
- A decision log entry documenting options, criteria, and rationale Correct answer.
- A resource calendar showing specialist availability
- A milestone list identifying the acceptance date
Explanation
A decision log records the context of a choice, the alternatives considered, the criteria applied, and the reasoning, which is exactly the knowledge needed to understand why an option was selected. Risk registers, resource calendars, and milestone lists record status and timing rather than the rationale behind decisions. Capturing rationale turns otherwise tacit reasoning into reusable explicit knowledge.
Question 28Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A globally distributed team keeps its working knowledge in a shared repository, but members report that they cannot tell which versions of procedures are current. Which information management control most directly addresses this problem?
- Encouraging members to email copies of procedures to each other
- Adding more folders to the repository structure
- Increasing the storage quota of the repository
- Introducing version control with clear ownership and review dates Correct answer.
Explanation
Version control combined with named ownership and periodic review dates lets users identify the authoritative current version of a procedure. Storage capacity and folder proliferation do not resolve ambiguity about currency, and emailing copies multiplies divergent versions. The underlying issue is information quality and control, not volume or structure alone.
Question 29Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A project manager is planning how the team will generate new shared understanding during a complex design phase. Which activity is best suited to creating new knowledge rather than merely transferring existing knowledge?
- Distributing a monthly status report to stakeholders
- Archiving closed project documents in the records system
- Structured brainstorming and problem-solving workshops with cross-functional participants Correct answer.
- Publishing the approved project management plan on the intranet
Explanation
Interactive workshops bring together diverse expertise so participants can combine and challenge ideas, which generates new shared knowledge rather than moving existing content. Publishing, distributing, and archiving are distribution and retention activities that transfer knowledge already held. Knowledge creation depends on dialogue and collaboration among people with different perspectives.
Question 30Project Knowledge and Information Management Fundamentals
A lessons-learned register contains many entries, but project teams rarely change their practices as a result. Analysis shows entries describe events without stating causes or recommended actions, and no one is assigned to act on them. Which combination of changes best improves the register's knowledge value?
- Requiring root-cause statements with recommended actions and assigning owners with follow-up dates Correct answer.
- Moving the register into the same folder as the project schedule for convenience
- Restricting access to the register so only senior managers can read it
- Shortening each entry to a single sentence and increasing the number of entries collected
Explanation
Lessons become actionable knowledge when they explain causes and prescribe specific recommendations, and when named owners with due dates ensure follow-through. Brevity and volume increase quantity without improving usefulness, restricted access limits reuse, and changing file location does not add substance. The gap is in content quality and accountability, not storage.
Question 31Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A knowledge engineer needs a technique that surfaces tacit, experience-based know-how from a single expert who cannot easily articulate their reasoning. Which elicitation technique is designed primarily for this purpose?
- Structured interview with probing questions Correct answer.
- Document analysis of existing manuals
- Review of the organization's process maps
- Questionnaire survey of the department
Explanation
Structured interviews with probing follow-ups are designed to draw out tacit knowledge, including the heuristics and exceptions an expert applies without consciously noticing them. Passive artifact-based methods reveal only what has already been written down, which is exactly the knowledge that failed to capture the tacit portion.
Question 32Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
During a knowledge capture session, an expert repeatedly says 'it depends' when asked how they handle customer escalations. Which response is the most appropriate elicitation move?
- Record 'it depends' as the captured knowledge and move on
- Ask the expert to describe two specific past cases that led to different decisions Correct answer.
- Ask the expert to write a general policy statement for all escalations
- End the session and request the expert's written procedures instead
Explanation
When an expert answers with 'it depends', the missing knowledge is the set of conditions that drive the variation. Asking for concrete contrasting cases forces the expert to articulate the factors that differed, which is the standard remedy in critical incident and case-based elicitation.
Question 33Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
Which elicitation technique involves observing an expert perform a real task while the expert narrates their reasoning aloud?
- Card sorting
- Think-aloud protocol Correct answer.
- Repertory grid
- Delphi method
Explanation
The think-aloud protocol has the expert verbalize reasoning in real time while performing an authentic task, exposing decision points that a retrospective interview might omit. It is a direct observation method rather than a consensus or sorting technique.
Question 34Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
What is the primary purpose of a repertory grid in knowledge elicitation?
- To record the duration of each step in a business process
- To elicit an expert's personal constructs by comparing elements in triads Correct answer.
- To rank requirements by implementation cost
- To validate a knowledge base against test cases
Explanation
The repertory grid technique, derived from personal construct theory, presents sets of elements and asks the expert to identify how some are alike and one differs, surfacing the dimensions the expert uses to judge situations. These bipolar constructs reveal tacit classification criteria that direct questioning often misses.
Question 35Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A team wants to elicit knowledge from a geographically dispersed group of experts while avoiding the dominance of senior personalities. Which technique best fits these constraints?
- Group brainstorming with a facilitator
- Focus group with all experts in one room
- One-to-one shadowing of the most senior expert
- Delphi method with anonymous iterative rounds Correct answer.
Explanation
The Delphi method collects anonymous expert input over several rounds with controlled feedback, which removes geographic constraints and reduces the influence of status or dominant personalities. Anonymity and iteration are its defining features.
Question 36Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
Which artifact is most useful as a starting point for capturing knowledge about an existing approval workflow before interviewing the people who perform it?
- The marketing style guide
- The organization's mission statement
- Employee satisfaction survey results
- Existing workflow diagrams and approval logs Correct answer.
Explanation
Workflow diagrams and approval logs document the actual steps and decision records of a process, giving the interviewer a factual baseline to probe and correct. This makes subsequent interviews more efficient and exposes gaps where documented and actual practice diverge.
Question 37Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
In a card-sorting exercise used for knowledge capture, what does the resulting grouping primarily reveal?
- The relative frequency of errors in a workflow
- The cost of each knowledge item
- The chronological order of tasks in a process
- The expert's mental categories and how items are related Correct answer.
Explanation
Card sorting asks participants to group items, and the resulting clusters expose the categories and relationships in the expert's mental model. This is valuable for designing a knowledge structure that matches how experts actually think.
Question 38Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A knowledge capture plan must record not just what an expert knows but how confident they are in each piece of knowledge. Which practice best supports this?
- Deleting any item the expert cannot fully explain
- Annotating each captured item with the expert's stated confidence and its source Correct answer.
- Recording only facts the expert states without hesitation
- Combining all items into one summary statement
Explanation
Capturing a confidence rating and provenance for each knowledge item lets downstream users judge reliability and prioritize verification. It preserves uncertainty instead of discarding it, which is essential for trustworthy knowledge bases.
Question 39Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
An expert describes a procedure but keeps omitting exceptions that they handle automatically. Which elicitation approach is most likely to surface those exceptions?
- Reviewing a sample of completed cases with the expert and asking why each deviated Correct answer.
- Interviewing a manager who oversees the expert
- Asking the expert to list all exceptions from memory in one pass
- Sending the expert a blank template to complete
Explanation
Walking through real completed cases anchors recall in concrete events, making automatic exception handling visible and discussable. Memory-only listing tends to reproduce the idealized procedure and miss the tacit deviations.
Question 40Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
Which condition most seriously undermines the validity of knowledge captured through a group focus session?
- A dominant participant's views crowd out quieter experts Correct answer.
- Participants are given a pre-session briefing
- The session is recorded with consent
- The facilitator uses a written agenda
Explanation
Group dynamics can let one or two voices define the captured knowledge, so the record reflects personality rather than consensus expertise. Facilitators must actively balance participation or use anonymous techniques to protect validity.
Question 41Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A knowledge engineer is eliciting expertise for a diagnostic system in a domain with many rare fault conditions. Which technique is best suited to capturing the reasoning used when evidence is incomplete?
- Conducting a staff satisfaction survey
- Laddering to move from examples to underlying values and criteria Correct answer.
- Simple direct questioning about each fault condition
- Reviewing the equipment purchase invoices
Explanation
Laddering probes upward from concrete examples to the criteria and values behind a judgment, exposing how experts reason under uncertainty rather than cataloguing isolated facts. That reasoning transfers to rare conditions that direct questioning would never enumerate.
Question 42Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
When should a knowledge engineer prefer a structured interview over an unstructured interview?
- When the session must generate entirely new hypotheses
- When the domain is poorly understood and exploration is the goal
- When specific topics must be covered consistently across multiple experts Correct answer.
- When the expert is uncomfortable with any prepared questions
Explanation
Structured interviews use a fixed question set, which ensures comparable coverage across experts and supports systematic comparison of their knowledge. Unstructured interviews are better when the domain is unfamiliar and the goal is open exploration.
Question 43Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A captured rule reads: 'If the order value exceeds the credit limit, escalate.' During verification, the expert notes this applies only to new customers. What does this reveal about the capture process?
- The original elicitation failed to probe for scope conditions Correct answer.
- Escalation rules should never be captured
- The rule is invalid and should be deleted
- The expert deliberately withheld information
Explanation
Missing scope conditions are a common elicitation gap: the expert stated the rule but not the boundary within which it holds. Verification caught it, and the fix is to add the condition and probe for similar qualifiers on other rules.
Question 44Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
Which technique is most appropriate for eliciting the criteria an expert uses to distinguish acceptable from unacceptable output when the expert struggles to state them directly?
- Asking the expert to rank fifty sample outputs from best to worst
- Counting how many outputs were produced last month
- Presenting pairs of examples and asking what makes them different Correct answer.
- Requesting the expert's job description
Explanation
Pairwise comparison of concrete examples forces the expert to articulate the discriminating criteria, which is the core of contrast-based elicitation. Ranking many items yields an order but not the reasons behind it.
Question 45Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
What distinguishes knowledge elicitation from knowledge acquisition in common practice?
- They are identical terms with no practical distinction
- Elicitation applies only to software, while acquisition applies only to training
- Elicitation focuses on extracting expertise from people, while acquisition also includes obtaining knowledge from documents and other sources Correct answer.
- Acquisition refers exclusively to buying knowledge assets
Explanation
Elicitation specifically denotes drawing out human expertise through interactive techniques, whereas acquisition is the broader activity that also covers documents, databases, and other non-human sources. The distinction helps teams choose the right method for each source.
Question 46Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A facilitator uses a technique in which experts write down ideas independently before any group discussion. What is the main benefit for knowledge capture?
- It eliminates the need for a facilitator
- It prevents early ideas from anchoring the group and preserves independent expertise Correct answer.
- It guarantees that all ideas are correct
- It shortens the session by removing discussion
Explanation
Independent idea generation before discussion reduces anchoring and conformity effects, so the captured knowledge reflects each expert's genuine view. This is the principle behind nominal group and similar silent-generation techniques.
Question 47Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
Which factor is the strongest reason to record an elicitation session rather than rely on notes alone?
- Notes may omit nuance and context that later review of the recording can recover Correct answer.
- Recording removes the need for consent from the expert
- Recordings are always shorter to review than notes
- Recording eliminates the need to verify the captured knowledge
Explanation
Note-taking inevitably compresses statements and loses hedging, examples, and context, while a recording allows later re-examination of exactly what was said. It supports verification and dispute resolution but does not replace either.
Question 48Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
An expert provides a heuristic: 'When the error rate spikes, check the sensor first.' What additional elicitation step best turns this heuristic into a usable rule?
- Ask the expert for their employment history
- Ask how the expert defines a spike and what evidence confirms the sensor is at fault Correct answer.
- Record the heuristic verbatim and stop
- Ask whether other experts agree with the general idea
Explanation
Heuristics contain implicit thresholds and confirmation criteria that must be made explicit before they can be operationalized. Probing the definition of 'spike' and the evidence for a sensor fault converts a vague cue into a testable rule.
Question 49Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
Which pairing of elicitation technique and its characteristic limitation is correct?
- Repertory grid - it can only be applied to physical objects
- Delphi method - it requires all experts to meet in person
- Think-aloud protocol - the expert may alter behavior because they are being observed Correct answer.
- Document analysis - it captures tacit knowledge that was never written down
Explanation
Observation-based methods such as think-aloud are subject to the observer effect, where the act of being watched or narrating changes how the expert performs. Recognizing this limitation guides facilitators to reassure participants and cross-check with other sources.
Question 50Knowledge Capture and Elicitation Techniques
A team must capture knowledge from a retiring expert within two weeks. Which plan best allocates limited elicitation time?
- Prioritize the highest-risk, least-documented expertise first, using case walkthroughs and observation Correct answer.
- Wait until the expert's final week and conduct one long interview
- Spend the entire period on a single comprehensive questionnaire
- Start by documenting the expert's entire career history
Explanation
Under severe time constraints, triage should target knowledge that is both critical and undocumented, using high-yield methods such as case walkthroughs and observation. This maximizes preserved value before the expertise is lost.