PSL N41 study plan
PSL N41 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Scrum Theory and Principles & The Scrum Team
Define the three pillars of empirical process control and give one concrete example of each in a team you have worked with
Explain in writing how the Scrum values enable the pillars, using one value per pillar
Map each of the five Scrum values to a specific observable team behavior
Distinguish Scrum's rules from its optional practices by classifying ten common team habits
Your checkpoint
A one-page written primer on Scrum theory that a new team member could read in five minutes, including the values-to-behaviors table
The Scrum Team
Describe the accountability of each of the three Scrum accountabilities and identify one anti-pattern for each
Explain why the Scrum Team is described as self-managing and cross-functional, and what each term does not mean
Contrast the Product Owner's accountability for value with the Developers' accountability for the increment
Explain the role of the Scrum Master as a true leader who serves, listing three specific services to the team and three to the organization
Your checkpoint
A role comparison matrix covering accountability, decisions owned, and typical failure modes for all three accountabilities
The Scrum Team & Scrum Events
Explain why the Scrum Team is one team with no sub-teams or hierarchies, and describe how a team can organize work without creating them
Describe the purpose and timebox of each of the five Scrum events and explain how each one enables inspection and adaptation
Explain the relationship between the Sprint and the other four events, including why the Sprint is called the container event
Justify the rule that no event may be shortened or extended, and describe what happens to transparency when it is
Your checkpoint
An event reference sheet listing purpose, timebox, participants, and the artifact inspected for each event, written from memory then corrected
Scrum Events & Scrum Artifacts and Commitments
Explain the inputs, outputs, and facilitation stance of Sprint Planning without describing a task-assignment meeting
Explain how the Sprint Goal creates focus and flexibility, and give two examples of scope negotiation that preserve it
Describe the purpose of the Daily Scrum and explain why it is for the Developers and not a status report to a manager
Explain the purpose of the Sprint Review and distinguish it from a demo or a gate approval
Explain the purpose of the Sprint Retrospective and how it produces at least one actionable improvement
Your checkpoint
A written walkthrough of a single Sprint from Planning to Retrospective, showing what is inspected and adapted at each event
Scrum Artifacts and Commitments
Define the three artifacts and name the commitment attached to each
Explain how the Product Goal, Sprint Goal, and Definition of Done each create transparency
Explain what the Definition of Done is and why it must be shared and explicit rather than assumed
Describe how the Product Backlog is refined and ordered, and what makes an item ready to be selected
Explain why the Increment is additive and what it means for an increment to be usable
Your checkpoint
An artifact-to-commitment map with a one-paragraph explanation of how each commitment makes inspection meaningful
Scrum Artifacts and Commitments & Facilitating Scrum Events and Team Effectiveness
Diagnose three scenarios where a missing or vague Definition of Done produced hidden work, and propose a fix for each
Explain how a Product Owner can order a backlog for value without dictating how Developers do the work
Describe facilitation techniques for keeping an event within its timebox without cutting it short
Explain how to facilitate a Retrospective so the team leaves with owned actions rather than complaints
Describe how to handle a dominant voice or a silent member in a team event
Your checkpoint
A facilitation playbook with one technique per Scrum event and a short note on when each technique fails
Facilitating Scrum Events and Team Effectiveness & Coaching, Mentoring, and Servant Leadership
Distinguish coaching, mentoring, teaching, and facilitating, and choose the right stance for three given situations
Explain how a Scrum Master removes impediments without taking ownership of the team's problems
Describe how to give feedback to a team member that is specific, behavioral, and actionable
Explain how servant leadership differs from directive management in the context of a self-managing team
Identify three organizational impediments and describe how to raise them with stakeholders without blame
Your checkpoint
Three written coaching scenarios: the situation, the stance chosen, the questions used, and the expected outcome
Scrum Theory and Principles & The Scrum Team & Scrum Events & Scrum Artifacts and Commitments & Facilitating Scrum Events and Team Effectiveness & Coaching, Mentoring, and Servant Leadership
Re-derive the purpose of each event and the commitment of each artifact without notes
Explain how Scrum theory explains each rule you would enforce as a Scrum Master
Identify your three weakest domains from practice results and close each gap with a written explanation
Practice explaining a common Scrum misconception and correcting it in under two minutes
Assemble a personal one-page summary of the framework from memory
Your checkpoint
A full timed practice assessment scored by domain, plus a one-page from-memory summary of Scrum that you correct against the source material
Milestones
Week 2: Can name all three accountabilities and state one accountability each owns and one each does not, without notes
Week 4: Can draw the Sprint container with all five events, their timeboxes, and the artifact each inspects, from memory
Week 5: Can pair all three artifacts with their commitments and explain why each commitment exists
Week 7: Can respond to three coaching scenarios with a chosen stance and two open questions each
Week 8: Scores at least 85 percent on a timed practice assessment with no domain below 75 percent