PSL N41 study materials
PSL N41 study resources

PSL N41 study plan

PSL N41 · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Scrum Theory and Principles & The Scrum Team

  • Define the three pillars of empirical process control and give one concrete example of each in a team you have worked with

  • Explain in writing how the Scrum values enable the pillars, using one value per pillar

  • Map each of the five Scrum values to a specific observable team behavior

  • Distinguish Scrum's rules from its optional practices by classifying ten common team habits

Your checkpoint

A one-page written primer on Scrum theory that a new team member could read in five minutes, including the values-to-behaviors table

Week 2

The Scrum Team

  • Describe the accountability of each of the three Scrum accountabilities and identify one anti-pattern for each

  • Explain why the Scrum Team is described as self-managing and cross-functional, and what each term does not mean

  • Contrast the Product Owner's accountability for value with the Developers' accountability for the increment

  • Explain the role of the Scrum Master as a true leader who serves, listing three specific services to the team and three to the organization

Your checkpoint

A role comparison matrix covering accountability, decisions owned, and typical failure modes for all three accountabilities

Week 3

The Scrum Team & Scrum Events

  • Explain why the Scrum Team is one team with no sub-teams or hierarchies, and describe how a team can organize work without creating them

  • Describe the purpose and timebox of each of the five Scrum events and explain how each one enables inspection and adaptation

  • Explain the relationship between the Sprint and the other four events, including why the Sprint is called the container event

  • Justify the rule that no event may be shortened or extended, and describe what happens to transparency when it is

Your checkpoint

An event reference sheet listing purpose, timebox, participants, and the artifact inspected for each event, written from memory then corrected

Week 4

Scrum Events & Scrum Artifacts and Commitments

  • Explain the inputs, outputs, and facilitation stance of Sprint Planning without describing a task-assignment meeting

  • Explain how the Sprint Goal creates focus and flexibility, and give two examples of scope negotiation that preserve it

  • Describe the purpose of the Daily Scrum and explain why it is for the Developers and not a status report to a manager

  • Explain the purpose of the Sprint Review and distinguish it from a demo or a gate approval

  • Explain the purpose of the Sprint Retrospective and how it produces at least one actionable improvement

Your checkpoint

A written walkthrough of a single Sprint from Planning to Retrospective, showing what is inspected and adapted at each event

Week 5

Scrum Artifacts and Commitments

  • Define the three artifacts and name the commitment attached to each

  • Explain how the Product Goal, Sprint Goal, and Definition of Done each create transparency

  • Explain what the Definition of Done is and why it must be shared and explicit rather than assumed

  • Describe how the Product Backlog is refined and ordered, and what makes an item ready to be selected

  • Explain why the Increment is additive and what it means for an increment to be usable

Your checkpoint

An artifact-to-commitment map with a one-paragraph explanation of how each commitment makes inspection meaningful

Week 6

Scrum Artifacts and Commitments & Facilitating Scrum Events and Team Effectiveness

  • Diagnose three scenarios where a missing or vague Definition of Done produced hidden work, and propose a fix for each

  • Explain how a Product Owner can order a backlog for value without dictating how Developers do the work

  • Describe facilitation techniques for keeping an event within its timebox without cutting it short

  • Explain how to facilitate a Retrospective so the team leaves with owned actions rather than complaints

  • Describe how to handle a dominant voice or a silent member in a team event

Your checkpoint

A facilitation playbook with one technique per Scrum event and a short note on when each technique fails

Week 7

Facilitating Scrum Events and Team Effectiveness & Coaching, Mentoring, and Servant Leadership

  • Distinguish coaching, mentoring, teaching, and facilitating, and choose the right stance for three given situations

  • Explain how a Scrum Master removes impediments without taking ownership of the team's problems

  • Describe how to give feedback to a team member that is specific, behavioral, and actionable

  • Explain how servant leadership differs from directive management in the context of a self-managing team

  • Identify three organizational impediments and describe how to raise them with stakeholders without blame

Your checkpoint

Three written coaching scenarios: the situation, the stance chosen, the questions used, and the expected outcome

Week 8

Scrum Theory and Principles & The Scrum Team & Scrum Events & Scrum Artifacts and Commitments & Facilitating Scrum Events and Team Effectiveness & Coaching, Mentoring, and Servant Leadership

  • Re-derive the purpose of each event and the commitment of each artifact without notes

  • Explain how Scrum theory explains each rule you would enforce as a Scrum Master

  • Identify your three weakest domains from practice results and close each gap with a written explanation

  • Practice explaining a common Scrum misconception and correcting it in under two minutes

  • Assemble a personal one-page summary of the framework from memory

Your checkpoint

A full timed practice assessment scored by domain, plus a one-page from-memory summary of Scrum that you correct against the source material

Milestones

Week 2: Can name all three accountabilities and state one accountability each owns and one each does not, without notes

Week 4: Can draw the Sprint container with all five events, their timeboxes, and the artifact each inspects, from memory

Week 5: Can pair all three artifacts with their commitments and explain why each commitment exists

Week 7: Can respond to three coaching scenarios with a chosen stance and two open questions each

Week 8: Scores at least 85 percent on a timed practice assessment with no domain below 75 percent