Rotating-Shift Client Who Wants the Plan, Not the Conversation
Marcus, 38, is a warehouse shift supervisor who works rotating 12-hour shifts (two weeks days, two weeks nights). He wants to lose 8 kg before his brother's wedding in 14 weeks. He has lost and regained 6–10 kg three times in five years using very low-calorie shake plans, each ending in a binge episode after 4–6 weeks. He describes himself as 'all or nothing' and says, 'Just write me the plan and I'll follow it - I don't need to talk about my feelings.' His 24-hour recall shows no breakfast on night shifts, one large meal at 2 a.m. from a vending machine, and 4–6 energy drinks per shift. He scores high on a readiness-to-change questionnaire for 'action' but has not changed anything in the past month, and he says his wife 'nags' him about food.
1. Reconcile the readiness score with his actual behavior. What stage or state is he really in, and what does that imply for your first two sessions?
Read the worked answer
An 'action' score measures what he believes and wants, not what he has done - and the behavioral evidence (nothing changed in a month) contradicts the label. Two explanations are worth testing in session.
First, his all-or-nothing pattern suggests he may be waiting for the perfect plan rather than being ready to act: high desire, low confidence in sustaining anything. Second, he may be in preparation, with the questionnaire picking up urgency about the wedding and a wish to please.
Use importance and confidence rulers - 'On 0–10, how important is this right now? How confident are you that you could keep it up for 14 weeks?' - instead of arguing with the score. The implication for the first two sessions is concrete: do not write the plan yet. Explore what happened at week 4–6 in each previous attempt, what the binge episodes looked like, and what he wants to be different. The wedding date is real, but 14 weeks is long enough that rushing straight to a plan reproduces the exact pattern that has failed three times.
2. He says 'just write me the plan.' Give a specific response that respects the request without abandoning your process, and explain why it works.
Read the worked answer
Reflect first, then offer a structured menu - rolling with resistance rather than confronting it. Something like:
"You want something concrete to follow, and you're tired of talking about it. Fair - you've done five of these plans already. I'll write you a plan. I just want to write one you'll still be on in week 12. Give me 15 minutes on what derailed the last one, and I'll build the first two weeks around that. If it doesn't feel different, I'll write the standard plan and we'll go."
That does three things: it validates the request instead of pathologizing it, it keeps the assessment in the room, and it hands him a choice - autonomy support, which predicts adherence better than the elegance of the plan.
Note the constraint that actually matters: 8 kg in 14 weeks is about 0.57 kg/week, roughly 0.6% of body weight weekly, which is realistic for an active 38-year-old man. The timeline is not the clinical problem. The history of regain is.
3. Design the first two weeks of behavioral homework - exactly what you ask him to track, and what you deliberately do not change yet.
Read the worked answer
Pick one keystone behavior and observe; do not overhaul. Given rotating nights, the leverage point is the first meal after waking, whichever shift he is on - the 2 a.m. vending-machine meal is a symptom, not the cause.
For two weeks:
- Eat a protein-containing meal within 90 minutes of waking, whatever 'waking' means that week.
- Log what he ate, the time, and a 1–5 hunger rating before and after. Nothing else.
- Note the energy-drink count each shift, with no target to cut it yet.
No calorie counting, no eliminations, no clean-eating rules. The purpose is to build the tracking habit and generate shift-specific data before changing anything, and to give him an early success that does not depend on the scale. Set one measurable process target - for example, 10 of 14 days - and review it next session. If he asks to do more, add one thing, not five. This is also where you preview the lapse: at some point he will miss three days, and that is data, not failure.