An Inscription That Argues With Its Reader
A student writing a source-analysis essay is given this fictional honorary inscription from a colonia:
Q. VIBIO Q. F. PAL. SEVERO TRIB. MIL., Q., TR. PL., AED. CUR., PR., COS., PATRONO COLONIAE
The essay makes three claims: (a) because Severus held the tribunate of the plebs, he was a plebeian, and his consulship therefore shows the stone was cut before 367 BC; (b) because COS. follows PR. rather than appearing alone, he was consul twice; (c) the sequence quaestor, tribunus plebis, aedilis curulis, praetor, consul is compatible with the developed cursus honorum. The teacher says two claims are wrong and one is broadly right, and asks the student to sort them out, to say what else the first two lines establish, and to say what would change if the stone read COS. II and CENS.
1. Evaluate claims (a) and (b).
Read the worked answer
Claim (a) starts from a sound observation and draws the reverse conclusion. The tribunate of the plebs was open only to plebeians, so Severus was plebeian. But plebeians gained access to the consulship through the Licinian-Sextian legislation of 367 BC, and the first plebeian consul followed in 366. A plebeian consul therefore dates after 367, not before; the stone, if anything, gives a terminus post quem. Claim (b) misreads abbreviation practice: iteration is marked by a numeral, COS. II, COS. III, and a bare COS. means one ordinary consulship. Its position after PR. simply reflects the order of the cursus, not a second tenure. Both claims fail because the student has imported an assumption instead of reading the conventions of the genre.
2. Evaluate claim (c) and say what the first two lines establish beyond the offices.
Read the worked answer
Claim (c) is broadly right. Q., TR. PL., AED. CUR., PR., COS. are all recognizable stages of a senatorial career, and the sequence is compatible with the developed cursus honorum. Two cautions: the relative order of the tribunate and the aedileship could vary, and many careers omitted one or another office, so the list shows a career of the expected shape rather than a rulebook sequence. The other elements are informative too: Q. F. is filiation, 'son of Quintus', which places him in a family and records a citizen's parentage; PAL. is the tribe Palatina, indicating registration in a voting tribe, not birthplace; PATRONO COLONIAE is an honorific, showing the town honored him as patron. None of this fixes a date or a precise rank on its own.
3. What would COS. II and CENS. add to the reading of the stone?
Read the worked answer
A second consulship and a censorship would mark a man of exceptional standing. Iteration of the consulship was not routine, and the censorship was normally held by ex-consuls and was not a step in the cursus honorum, so its appearance signals a senior figure at the top of the political order rather than someone climbing. It would also help with dating and with estimating the family's position, since the combination is characteristic of leading consular families, especially in the late Republic and early Empire. What it would still not tell us is legal status by birth: a novus homo could reach the same heights, and the inscription records offices, not ancestry.