NAVLE study materials
NAVLE study resources

Small Intestinal Colic in a Horse with Financial Constraints

NAVLE · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Small Intestinal Colic in a Horse with Financial Constraints

A 12-year-old quarter horse gelding is examined for 6 hours of colic. He is sweating, pawing, and has a heart rate of 64 beats/min, respiratory rate of 24/min, and rectal temperature of 38.0°C. Mucous membranes are injected with CRT 3 seconds. PCV is 48%, total protein 7.2 g/dL, lactate 5.0 mmol/L, and glucose 110 mg/dL. Nasogastric reflux is 4 L of green fluid. On rectal examination, several distended small intestinal loops are palpable, and the cecum is not distended. Abdominal ultrasound shows 3 cm of small intestinal wall and reduced motility. The owner cannot afford referral for surgery and asks whether medical treatment with fluids and pain relief can be attempted.

1. What is your working diagnosis and urgency? Explain the reasoning.

Read the worked answer

The working diagnosis is small intestinal obstruction, likely strangulating, until proven otherwise. The evidence is:

  • Persistent pain and sweating despite time.
  • Nasogastric reflux of 4 L, which suggests small intestinal stasis or obstruction.
  • Distended small intestinal loops on rectal examination with a non-distended cecum.
  • Thickened small intestinal wall and reduced motility on ultrasound.
  • Hemoconcentration (PCV 48%) and lactate 5.0 mmol/L, indicating poor perfusion and possible intestinal ischemia.

This is a surgical emergency. Medical therapy with fluids and analgesia may temporarily stabilize the horse, but it does not relieve a mechanical obstruction and does not address strangulation. Delay increases the risk of intestinal necrosis, rupture, and death. The owner should be told clearly that referral for surgery is the best option; if that is impossible, euthanasia should be discussed as a humane alternative.

2. If referral is not possible, outline a medical plan and its limitations.

Read the worked answer

Medical plan (stabilization only):

  • Place an IV catheter and give balanced isotonic crystalloids to correct dehydration and support perfusion. Use boluses and reassess PCV/TP, lactate, and mentation.
  • Decompress the stomach with a nasogastric tube and monitor reflux volume.
  • Provide analgesia; flunixin meglumine can be used cautiously, but repeated NSAID dosing is risky if dehydration or renal compromise develops. Consider referral options for better pain control.
  • Monitor heart rate, pain score, PCV/TP, lactate, reflux, abdominal distension, and urination.

Limitations: this plan does not relieve a mechanical obstruction or strangulation. It may buy time for transport or for the owner to make decisions, but it is not definitive treatment. Set a clear time limit-reassess within 2–4 hours. If pain is uncontrolled, lactate is rising, PCV is climbing, or reflux is increasing, euthanasia is appropriate.

3. What specific parameters would you use to decide whether to continue or euthanize?

Read the worked answer

Use a combination of clinical and laboratory trends:

  • Pain: persistent pawing, sweating, rolling, or failure to respond to analgesia is a poor sign.
  • Cardiovascular: rising heart rate, worsening CRT, weak pulses, or falling blood pressure.
  • Perfusion/laboratory: rising PCV, rising lactate, worsening metabolic acidosis, or azotemia.
  • Abdominal findings: increasing distension, more reflux, or ultrasound evidence of thickened, immotile intestine.
  • Response to therapy: if the horse does not improve within a defined window, do not continue indefinitely.

Judgment point: in a horse with suspected strangulating obstruction and no access to surgery, the decision is not “try harder medically.” It is whether stabilization is improving the horse or merely prolonging suffering. If the trend is worsening, recommend euthanasia.