What the Rehab Tech and the COTA May Do on a Saturday
A 78-year-old man is 12 days post left middle cerebral artery stroke in a skilled nursing facility, admitted under Medicare Part A. The OT evaluated him on day 3, set a plan of care at five times weekly addressing left upper-extremity control, bed mobility, and dressing with adaptive equipment, and documented that he requires moderate assistance with setup and cueing. The facility employs one COTA and shares one unlicensed rehabilitation technician across two buildings. On Friday the director of nursing asks the technician to "run the OT exercises" on Saturday because the OT is scheduled at the other building 30 minutes away and the COTA is already booked. Separately, the COTA asks whether she can complete the initial evaluation for a new admission Saturday morning and start a plan of care so the patient is not behind on Monday. The patient's daughter corners the OT and asks her to sign a statement that her father "will never walk or dress himself again" for a guardianship filing.
1. Can the rehabilitation technician carry out Saturday's session as requested? Explain what may and may not be delegated to unlicensed personnel.
Read the worked answer
No, not as described. The line is skilled versus non-skilled, and patient-specific versus generalized. The technician may perform non-skilled, non-clinical tasks - transporting the patient, setting up equipment already selected, cleaning, filing, preparing the treatment area - under the OT's delegation and within facility policy. The technician may not carry out a skilled occupational therapy intervention, progress or downgrade an exercise, adjust cues, monitor for changes in tone or fatigue, or make any clinical judgment about the patient's response.
The described session is skilled: the plan calls for moderate assistance and cueing for a patient 12 days post-stroke, and anyone delivering it must be able to grade the task and recognize deterioration. Delegating it would also create a supervision and billing problem, because services would be recorded as occupational therapy when delivered by someone who cannot provide them.
The defensible options are to have the COTA treat, to reschedule or make up the visit with the OT, or to reconfigure the schedule so the OT is on site. If the patient's needs are genuinely maintenance-level and non-skilled, that determination must be made deliberately and documented, not used as a workaround to cover a staffing gap.
2. How should the OT respond to the COTA's request to complete the initial evaluation and start a plan of care?
Read the worked answer
The COTA may not perform the initial evaluation, interpret findings, establish the plan of care, or make an autonomous discharge decision. Those are evaluation and clinical-reasoning functions reserved to the occupational therapist, and the COTA's role is to contribute observations, implement the plan, and report change.
The correct response is a clear "not this," with an alternative. The new admission can be screened for safety and positioned for Monday, with the COTA gathering information that the OT will use - but the evaluation and plan of care wait for the OT, and the Saturday documentation must say exactly who did what and why. The OT should also consider whether an evaluation can be completed by video or by rearranging Saturday coverage; if the OT delegates data collection, she must specify it in advance and review it.
The underlying reasoning: delegation is defined by the task's clinical demands, not by the assistant's confidence or by the facility's scheduling pressure. A COTA who performs an evaluation "so the patient is not behind" has practiced outside scope, and an OT who permits it shares the responsibility.
3. How should the OT handle the daughter's request for a signed statement about her father's prognosis?
Read the worked answer
The OT should decline to sign the statement as framed, and should say so plainly and without judgment. A prediction that a patient will "never" walk or dress again is a prognosis, not an occupational therapy finding; it is outside the OT's role, it is not something the OT can know with certainty 12 days post-stroke, and it may be used in a legal proceeding in ways the OT cannot anticipate. Signing it would misrepresent the therapist's expertise and could mislead a court.
What the OT can legitimately provide is factual, dated, functional information: current assistance levels for dressing, bed mobility, and upper-extremity control; the interventions in place; and the expected course of therapy subject to the patient's medical status. The OT should explain the difference to the daughter, offer to route the request to the administrator or social worker who handles legal documents, and document the conversation and the response in the record.
This scenario tests whether the therapist can separate a legitimate request for information from an illegitimate request for a conclusion, and whether the refusal is handled in a way that keeps the family engaged rather than adversarial.