NEBOSH Working with Wellbeing study materials
NEBOSH Working with Wellbeing study resources

Remote construction site with staggered breaks

NEBOSH Working with Wellbeing · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Remote construction site with staggered breaks

You are site supervisor on a 30-person construction project. The site cabin has a vending machine, a kettle and a small fridge; there is no canteen. Work starts at 07:00; 12 workers do a night shift 19:00–03:00. A recent health screening found 9 workers with high blood pressure, 4 with a BMI over 35, and one worker with type 2 diabetes who says he eats from the van because breaks are staggered. The nearest shop is a 15-minute drive; the site is remote. Two workers have complained of dizziness by mid-afternoon; several drink 4–5 energy drinks a day. Your budget is £250 for the next three months. What do you do?

1. Identify the nutritional and hydration risks in this setup and explain how shift patterns and access affect them.

Read the worked answer

The risks are access, timing and culture, not just food choice. The vending machine and energy drinks are the easiest options; the nearest shop is 15 minutes away, so a 30-minute break is barely enough. The small fridge and kettle limit what can be stored, and there is no canteen. Staggered breaks mean the worker with type 2 diabetes may eat from the van at unpredictable times; for someone on medication, irregular meals matter. Night-shift workers may eat at the start and end of shift, often high-sugar snacks, and may use caffeine to stay awake. The mid-afternoon dizziness could relate to missed meals, dehydration or heat, but I should not diagnose; it needs a prompt review and first-aid or occupational health signposting. Four to five energy drinks a day is a high caffeine intake and can affect sleep and heart rate. The health screening data suggest a population-level risk, but the response should not single people out. The reason to focus on access is that willpower is a poor control when the environment offers only fizzy drinks and confectionery.

2. Propose practical changes for the next three months with £250, including how to involve workers and avoid stigma.

Read the worked answer

Spend on access, not lecturing. Ask the vending contractor to add water and lower-sugar options on trial; if they refuse, stop stocking the highest-caffeine drink or move it. Use £250 for a second-hand microwave, a water cooler or large water dispenser, and a cool box for night shift. Set up a fruit bowl and a bring-one-to-share shelf, but keep it voluntary. Provide a kettle and cold water at the night-shift briefing point. Time the breaks so the night shift has one proper meal break, not two rushed ones. Involve workers by asking two or three volunteers from each shift to choose the vending options and test the water station; do not single out the worker with diabetes. Put up a simple poster on hydration and energy drinks, and signpost occupational health for blood pressure, BMI and diabetes review. Avoid weighing people or public diet challenges. The reasoning is that small environmental changes are more likely to stick than a one-off healthy-eating talk, and involving workers reduces the sense of being policed.

3. How would you evaluate the changes and what would you do if the vending contractor refuses to change?

Read the worked answer

Evaluate with simple, non-stigmatising measures: vending sales by product, water station use, number of dizziness reports, and a two-question feedback slip. Do not publish individual weight, BMI or blood pressure. Compare four weeks before and after, and ask the night shift separately because their access is different. If the contractor refuses, use the contract: ask for the sales data, request a trial of two healthier lines, and escalate to procurement or the site's main contractor. In the meantime, provide an alternative: a water dispenser and a fruit box next to the vending machine, so the healthy option is at least as visible. If the contractor still refuses, document it and consider removing the machine at contract renewal. The reasoning is that the contractor is a supplier, not an excuse; the site still controls what it provides and where. Also review the dizziness reports; if they continue, treat it as a health and safety issue, not a nutrition one.