Bar Part I Legal System study materials
Bar Part I Legal System study resources

Bar Part I Legal System cheat sheet

Bar Part I Legal System · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Sources and Hierarchy of Law

  • Hierarchy of norms: constitution > statutes and treaties > delegated legislation > case law interpretation > custom and general principles; a lower norm conflicting with a higher norm is inapplicable.

  • Statute prevails over case law; a court may interpret but not displace clear statutory text.

  • Delegated legislation is valid only within the enabling statute's scope, procedure, and purpose; excess of power renders it void.

  • Custom applies only where written law is silent, the practice is long-standing, general, and consistently observed, and it is accepted as binding.

  • General principles of law (good faith, unjust enrichment, no liability without fault) fill gaps and guide interpretation but yield to statute.

  • Treaties bind the state internationally; domestically they take effect per constitutional rules on ratification and publication.

  • Lex specialis derogat legi generali; lex posterior derogat legi priori - apply specialty first, then chronology, among norms of equal rank.

  • Interpretation methods in order: literal text, systematic context, purpose, then travaux préparatoires as subsidiary aid.

Quick reference

Constitutional Framework

  • Constitution is the supreme norm: any act contrary to it is invalid; constitutional review is typically concentrated in a constitutional court or reserved to a supreme court chamber.

  • Separation of powers: legislative (rule-making), executive (implementation), judicial (adjudication); each organ may not exercise another's core function.

  • Legality of administration: every administrative act must have a legal basis, pursue a lawful purpose, and respect proportionality.

  • Fundamental rights bind all public authority and, where the constitution so provides, have indirect horizontal effect between private parties.

  • Proportionality test: legitimate aim, suitable means, necessity (least restrictive), and balancing in the narrow sense.

  • Equality: like cases treated alike; distinctions require objective and reasonable justification proportionate to the aim.

  • Rule of law requires publicity of norms, non-retroactivity of criminal and punitive provisions, and access to an independent tribunal.

  • Emergency powers must be time-limited, subject to parliamentary control, and cannot suspend non-derogable rights.

Quick reference

Court System, Jurisdiction and Competence

  • Jurisdiction has three dimensions: subject matter (ratione materiae), territory (ratione loci), and person or amount (ratione personae/valor).

  • Competence is the court's legal power to hear a specific case; lack of jurisdiction is a matter of public order, raised at any time and examined ex officio.

  • Ordinary courts hear civil and criminal matters; administrative courts review public-body acts; constitutional court handles norm review and rights complaints.

  • Territorial rules in civil matters: defendant's domicile as general forum; contract (place of performance), tort (place of harm), property (situs) as special fora.

  • Forum non conveniens or lis pendens rules prevent parallel proceedings; first-seised court generally retains control within integrated systems.

  • Hierarchy of instances: first instance, appeal (law and sometimes fact), cassation (law only); remand to a lower court follows quashing.

  • Recusal is mandatory where a judge has a personal interest, prior involvement, or relationship with a party; breach vitiates the judgment.

  • Arbitration excludes ordinary court jurisdiction where a valid arbitration agreement covers the dispute, subject to review of the award.

Quick reference

Civil Procedure and Evidence

  • Burden of proof: the party asserting a fact must prove it; the other party benefits from the failure of proof (actori incumbit probatio).

  • Standard of proof in civil matters is the balance of probabilities or high probability, lower than the criminal standard beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Admissibility: relevance plus lawfulness; evidence obtained in violation of fundamental rights may be excluded proportionally.

  • Documents, party testimony, witness evidence, expert opinion, inspection, and presumptions are typical means of proof; written evidence generally prevails over testimony.

  • Res judicata attaches to the operative part of a final judgment and bars re-litigation of the same claim, parties, and cause.

  • Default judgment requires proper service and expiry of the defence period; the defendant may later challenge within a strict time limit.

  • Interim measures (attachment, injunction) require fumus boni iuris and periculum in mora; they are provisional and do not decide the merits.

  • Judgment must be reasoned; failure to address a decisive argument is a ground of appeal or cassation.

Quick reference

Criminal Procedure and Evidence

  • Legality of prosecution: no crime or punishment without a prior statutory definition (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege).

  • Presumption of innocence places the burden of proof on the prosecution; doubt is resolved in favour of the accused (in dubio pro reo).

  • Rights of the accused: information of charges, access to a lawyer, adequate time and facilities, interpretation, silence, and appeal.

  • Coercive measures (detention, search, seizure, interception) require a judicial warrant or immediate judicial review within a statutory period.

  • Exclusionary rule: evidence obtained through torture or serious violation of rights is inadmissible; lesser violations trigger proportional balancing.

  • Chain of custody and authentication are required for physical and digital evidence; breaks in custody affect weight.

  • Ne bis in idem bars second prosecution for the same facts; double jeopardy protection applies across integrated jurisdictions.

  • Time limits for investigation and pre-trial detention are mandatory; expiry compels release or termination of proceedings.

Quick reference

Civil Law Obligations and Contracts

  • Valid contract requires capacity, consent free of defect, certain object, and lawful cause; defect of consent (error, fraud, duress) permits annulment.

  • Offer plus acceptance forms the contract at the moment acceptance reaches the offeror; revocation must arrive before or with acceptance.

  • Breach remedies: specific performance, cure, price reduction, damages (expectation interest), and termination for material breach.

  • Damages cover loss suffered and gain foregone, limited by foreseeability at conclusion and by mitigation; fault-based in delict.

  • Force majeure requires unforeseeable, irresistible, external event; it suspends or excuses performance but does not create a right to damages.

  • Solidary liability: each debtor liable for the whole; contribution among co-debtors is pro rata unless otherwise agreed.

  • Unjust enrichment requires enrichment, impoverishment, absence of cause, and no other remedy; restitution is limited to the lesser amount.

  • Limitation periods extinguish the action, not the right; they begin when the creditor knows or should know of the damage and debtor.

Quick reference

Criminal Law: General Principles and Offences

  • Actus reus requires conduct (act or culpable omission), causation, and a result where the offence so requires; mere thoughts are not punishable.

  • Mens rea levels: intention (dolus directus, indirectus, eventualis) and negligence (conscious or unconscious); dolus eventualis means foreseeing and accepting the risk.

  • Causation is tested by conditio sine qua non, then limited by objective imputation (foreseeability, protective purpose of the norm).

  • Justifications negate unlawfulness: self-defence (proportionate, necessary, against present unlawful attack), necessity, consent, lawful authority.

  • Excuses negate culpability: insanity, minority, duress, mistake of law where unavoidable; mistake of fact negates intent.

  • Attempt is punishable where the actor has the intent and begins execution; voluntary abandonment before completion excludes punishment.

  • Participation: perpetration (direct, co-perpetration, indirect via another), instigation, and aiding; each participant's liability is assessed individually.

  • Corporate criminal liability attaches where an organ or representative commits an offence for the entity's benefit; penalties include fines and compliance orders.

Quick reference

Administrative Law and Judicial Review

  • Administrative act = unilateral, authoritative decision by a public body on a concrete case under public law; it is presumed lawful until annulled.

  • Grounds of review: lack of competence, defect of form or procedure, misuse of power, and violation of law including proportionality.

  • Standing requires a personal, direct, and legitimate interest affected by the act; associations may act where statute allows.

  • Time limits to challenge are short and peremptory (often 30–60 days from notification or knowledge); expiry makes the act final.

  • Effects of annulment are generally ex tunc; the court may order the administration to restore the position or pay compensation.

  • Silence of the administration beyond a statutory period may be treated as an implied refusal, challengeable in court.

  • Full jurisdiction review covers facts and law for sanctions and rights; planning discretion is reviewed for procedural and substantive limits only.

  • Public procurement and licensing decisions are subject to mandatory pre-litigation review or standstill periods in many systems.

Quick reference

Commercial and Company Law

  • Legal personality: a company acquires it on registration; shareholders' liability is limited to their contribution save for abuse of the corporate veil.

  • Corporate organs: general meeting (reserved matters, appointment, accounts), board (management), auditor; conflicts of interest require disclosure and abstention.

  • Directors owe duties of care and loyalty; the business judgment rule shields informed, disinterested decisions taken in good faith.

  • Share transfers: registered shares transfer by endorsement and registration; the company may refuse only on statutory grounds.

  • Capital maintenance: distributions only from distributable profits; unlawful distributions must be repaid and may trigger director liability.

  • Insolvency: directors must file when liabilities exceed assets or debts are due; wrongful trading exposes them to personal liability.

  • Commercial transactions: good-faith purchaser protection, retention of title, and set-off rules govern sale of goods and security.

  • Competition rules prohibit cartels, abuse of dominance, and merger without clearance; fines are turnover-based and contracts void.

Quick reference

Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

  • Duty of loyalty: the lawyer must avoid conflicts of interest; a former client's confidential information may bar a new adverse mandate.

  • Confidentiality covers all information learned in the mandate and survives termination; disclosure is permitted only with consent or legal compulsion.

  • Independence requires refusal of instructions that would make the lawyer an instrument of illegality or deception of the court.

  • Duty to the court prevails over client interest: no false evidence, no misleading submissions, disclosure of adverse authority where required.

  • Fees must be agreed in writing, be reasonable, and may not be contingent on the outcome in criminal matters.

  • Client funds must be held in a separate trust account; commingling and unauthorised withdrawals are disciplinary offences.

  • Mandatory withdrawal applies where the client persists in fraud or the lawyer's continued service breaches the law; withdrawal otherwise requires notice.

  • Advertising is permitted only if truthful and not misleading; solicitation of vulnerable persons and champerty are prohibited.

Quick reference

Legal Method, Reasoning and Case Analysis

  • IRAC structure: Issue (legal question), Rule (applicable norm and precedent), Application (facts to rule), Conclusion (outcome and remedy).

  • Ratio decidendi is the binding rule necessary to the decision; obiter dicta are persuasive only.

  • Distinguishing turns on material factual differences; overruling addresses legal error; reversing addresses the same case on appeal.

  • Deductive reasoning applies the rule to facts; analogy extends a rule to similar cases; a contrario excludes unregulated cases.

  • Systematic interpretation reads a provision within its chapter and the whole statute; teleological interpretation pursues the statutory purpose.

  • Burden analysis: identify who bears the burden on each element, then test whether the evidence satisfies the applicable standard.

  • Counter-argument method: state the strongest opposing construction, test it against text and purpose, and explain why it fails.

  • Precedent hierarchy: higher courts bind lower ones; a court may depart from its own precedent only for strong reasons, stating them.