NIGP-CPP study materials
NIGP-CPP study resources

NIGP-CPP key terms

NIGP-CPP · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.

Best Value Determination

A documented evaluation method that weighs price alongside non-price factors such as quality, past performance, and lifecycle cost to select the offer giving the greatest overall advantage rather than the lowest bid.

Related: Weighted Scoring Evaluation, Life-Cycle Costing, Responsiveness
Responsiveness

The degree to which a submitted offer conforms to the material terms, conditions, and specifications of the solicitation, judged before any award decision is made.

Related: Responsibility, Best Value Determination
Responsibility

A prospective contractor's demonstrated capacity and integrity to perform, covering financial resources, experience, facilities, and record of satisfactory prior performance; assessed separately from the offer's responsiveness.

Related: Responsiveness, Past Performance Evaluation
Weighted Scoring Evaluation

A scoring structure that assigns points to each criterion in proportion to its stated importance, allowing evaluators to compare offers on a common numerical scale before ranking.

Related: Best Value Determination, Evaluation Committee
Evaluation Committee

A group of qualified individuals assembled to independently review offers against published criteria, document individual scores, and reach a consensus recommendation for award.

Related: Weighted Scoring Evaluation, Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Two-Step Sealed Bidding

A solicitation method using unpriced technical proposals first to refine specifications, followed by a priced bidding stage among technically acceptable offerors.

Related: Competitive Sealed Bidding, Request for Proposal
Competitive Sealed Bidding

An award method in which sealed price bids are publicly opened at a set time and the contract goes to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder meeting the stated requirements.

Related: Responsiveness, Responsibility, Two-Step Sealed Bidding
Request for Proposal

A solicitation document that describes a need and invites offerors to propose solutions and pricing, used when requirements cannot be tightly specified and negotiation or best-value tradeoffs are expected.

Related: Best Value Determination, Competitive Range
Competitive Range

The group of offerors whose proposals are judged most likely to result in an acceptable award, and with whom discussions or negotiations will proceed.

Related: Request for Proposal, Clarifications Versus Discussions
Clarifications Versus Discussions

The distinction between limited exchanges to resolve minor informalities or obvious errors and substantive negotiations that allow offerors to revise proposals and require all in-range offerors be treated fairly.

Related: Competitive Range, Best and Final Offer
Best and Final Offer

A final submission requested from offerors after discussions, allowing each to revise price and technical content before the agency makes its award decision.

Related: Clarifications Versus Discussions, Competitive Range
Protest

A formal challenge to a solicitation, award, or procurement decision filed by an interested party, triggering an administrative or judicial review process with defined deadlines.

Related: Debriefing, Stay of Award
Debriefing

A structured post-award explanation given to unsuccessful offerors describing evaluation results and the basis for the award, typically required on request and subject to confidentiality limits.

Related: Protest, Evaluation Committee
Emergency Procurement

An expedited purchasing authority invoked when an imminent threat to life, property, or essential operations requires immediate action, usually with documented justification and post-hoc review.

Related: Sole Source Justification, Procurement Threshold
Sole Source Justification

A written rationale demonstrating that only one supplier can meet the requirement, supporting a noncompetitive award and typically requiring review and approval above a stated threshold.

Related: Emergency Procurement, Procurement Threshold
Procurement Threshold

A dollar level set by statute or policy that determines which purchasing method, approval level, and competition requirements apply to a given acquisition.

Related: Sole Source Justification, Emergency Procurement
Cooperative Purchasing

An arrangement in which an agency buys through a contract established by another government entity or consortium, leveraging aggregated volume and avoiding duplicate solicitation effort.

Related: Piggyback Contract, Procurement Threshold
Piggyback Contract

Use of an existing contract awarded by another jurisdiction to obtain goods or services, permitted only where law and the original contract allow it and pricing remains valid.

Related: Cooperative Purchasing, Contract Assignment
Contract Assignment

The transfer of rights or obligations under an existing contract to another party, which generally requires written consent and must not reduce competition or alter agreed terms.

Related: Novation, Piggyback Contract
Novation

A three-party agreement replacing one contracting party with another, commonly used after merger or acquisition so the government's rights and obligations continue without interruption.

Related: Contract Assignment, Contract Modification
Contract Modification

A written change to contract terms, scope, price, or schedule, executed by authorized officials and classified as bilateral when signed by both parties or unilateral when within a changes clause.

Related: Constructive Change, Scope of Work
Constructive Change

An informal direction or action by agency personnel that alters contractor performance without a formal modification, potentially entitling the contractor to an equitable price adjustment.

Related: Contract Modification, Equitable Adjustment
Equitable Adjustment

A price or time adjustment that restores the contractor to the position it would have occupied absent a government-directed change, without providing profit on the change itself.

Related: Constructive Change, Contract Modification
Scope of Work

The contract section defining what the contractor must deliver, including quantities, performance standards, and boundaries that limit permissible modifications without new competition.

Related: Contract Modification, Performance Work Statement
Performance Work Statement

A results-oriented description of required outcomes, measurable performance standards, and quality assurance approach, used in service contracts instead of prescriptive methods.

Related: Scope of Work, Key Performance Indicator
Key Performance Indicator

A defined, measurable metric tied to contract outcomes that allows both parties to track service quality and trigger remedies or incentives.

Related: Performance Work Statement, Service Level Agreement
Service Level Agreement

A contract annex specifying measurable service targets, measurement methods, reporting, and remedies for shortfalls, commonly used in information technology and facilities contracts.

Related: Key Performance Indicator, Liquidated Damages
Liquidated Damages

A pre-agreed sum payable for specified delays or failures, enforceable only when it is a reasonable forecast of anticipated harm rather than a penalty.

Related: Service Level Agreement, Contract Modification
Past Performance Evaluation

A structured review of a supplier's record on comparable contracts, using references or agency databases, used to judge likelihood of successful future performance.

Related: Responsibility, Supplier Scorecard
Supplier Scorecard

A periodic rating instrument summarizing a supplier's delivery, quality, cost control, and responsiveness, used to guide contract renewals and relationship improvement discussions.

Related: Past Performance Evaluation, Key Performance Indicator
Supplier Relationship Management

A deliberate program of segmenting suppliers by importance, setting governance routines, and jointly managing performance and risk to extract value beyond transactional purchasing.

Related: Supplier Scorecard, Vendor Lock-In
Vendor Lock-In

A condition where switching costs, proprietary formats, or long-term obligations make it impractical to change suppliers, reducing future leverage and competition.

Related: Supplier Relationship Management, Life-Cycle Costing
Life-Cycle Costing

An analysis totaling acquisition, operating, maintenance, and disposal costs over a product's useful life so that award decisions reflect total cost rather than purchase price alone.

Related: Best Value Determination, Total Cost of Ownership
Total Cost of Ownership

The aggregate of all direct and indirect costs attributable to acquiring and using a good or service, including administration, training, downtime, and risk-related expense.

Related: Life-Cycle Costing, Encumbrance
Encumbrance

A commitment recorded against a budget line reserving funds for a specific obligation such as a purchase order or contract, preventing duplicate spending of the same appropriation.

Related: Appropriation, Purchase Order
Appropriation

Legislative authorization to spend public funds for specified purposes during a defined period, establishing the legal ceiling within which procurement obligations must remain.

Related: Encumbrance, Fiscal Year Closeout
Fiscal Year Closeout

The end-of-period process of validating obligations, accruing received goods and services, and closing or carrying forward balances in accordance with accounting rules.

Related: Appropriation, Encumbrance
Conflict of Interest Disclosure

A written statement by an employee or evaluator identifying financial or personal interests that could bias procurement decisions, enabling recusal or management before action is taken.

Related: Evaluation Committee, Procurement Ethics
Procurement Ethics

The standards of conduct governing public buyers, including impartiality, confidentiality of proprietary offer information, refusal of gratuities, and avoidance of appearances of impropriety.

Related: Conflict of Interest Disclosure, Gratuity Acceptance
Gratuity Acceptance

Receipt of gifts, meals, or favors from suppliers or bidders, which is restricted or prohibited because it can compromise impartial judgment and undermine public trust.

Related: Procurement Ethics, Conflict of Interest Disclosure