Daytime Burglary Pattern With an Overtime Cap
The township has 78,000 residents and 112 sworn officers. Patrol runs four 12-hour platoons, each with 12 officers and two sergeants; minimum staffing is eight per shift. Over 60 days, 34 residential burglaries have occurred, 26 of them in Sectors 3 and 4 between 10:00 and 15:00. Most involved forced rear doors and a stolen vehicle. Two officers are on injured leave, one is deployed, and overtime is at 92% of its $1.4 million annual line with four months left. The chief tells you to reduce the burglary pattern without exceeding the overtime budget. The CBA requires 48 hours' notice for shift changes and overtime equalization by seniority. A community meeting is scheduled in five days, and the mayor has asked for a one-page plan.
1. Identify and evaluate the realistic deployment options. Which option or combination do you recommend, and why?
Read the worked answer
First, test the pattern before adding bodies. Pull CAD/RMS data for the 34 burglaries: day of week, time window, entry method, point of entry, stolen vehicle, and repeat victimization. The 10:00–15:00 concentration means the current day platoon is on duty when the burglars are active but may be tied up on calls; the night platoon is largely irrelevant to this pattern. Options: (a) stagger start times so four officers begin at 09:00 and four at 13:00, creating overlap from 13:00 to 15:00; (b) create a six-officer directed patrol team on overtime four days a week, 10:00–16:00; (c) assign two detectives to repeat-victim contact and pawn/online sales checks; (d) use unmarked cars and alley checks rather than visible saturation, because the pattern shows rear-door entry. Compare cost: six officers × six hours × four days × eight weeks = 1,152 overtime hours; at $65 per hour that is about $74,880, or roughly two-thirds of the remaining overtime balance. The directed team is feasible only if other overtime is cut. Staggering costs no overtime but requires notice and may reduce evening coverage. Recommended: stagger plus a smaller four-officer directed team, and divert two officers from low-yield traffic enforcement. Monitor attempted burglaries, calls held, response time, and overtime by shift, not just arrests.
2. How do you implement the plan within the CBA and overtime constraints, and what do you tell the community and the mayor?
Read the worked answer
Implementation must respect the CBA and fatigue. Give the 48-hour notice in writing; post the changed shifts and solicit volunteers by seniority for the directed team, then assign by inverse seniority if too few volunteer, consistent with the equalization clause. Cap overtime at 16 hours per officer per week and avoid pulling night-shift officers into daytime overtime or court. Use comp time only if the CBA permits and the budget office agrees. Because the overtime line has about $112,000 left, authorize the directed team in two-week blocks with a review, not for the full eight weeks. The community meeting should present the data, the specific streets, and a request for doorbell or camera footage, not a promise of arrests. The one-page plan for the mayor should state: four officers staggered, a four-officer directed team for 14 days, two detectives on repeat victims, an overtime ceiling, and the metrics. If burglaries do not fall by 25% in 14 days, shift the directed team to the second hotspot and reassess. This is an operational deployment decision; keep the union informed, but do not negotiate the plan beyond the CBA notice and equalization requirements.