NMTCB PET study materials
NMTCB PET study resources

NMTCB PET study plan

NMTCB PET · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

PET instrumentation and physics

  • Map the full PET detection chain from annihilation photon to list-mode event, labeling each conversion step and where energy, timing, and position information are extracted

  • Compare scintillator properties (light yield, decay time, stopping power, energy resolution) across LSO, LYSO, BGO, and GSO and state which property drives each performance trade-off

  • Derive why 511 keV annihilation produces two colinear photons and explain how non-colinearity and positron range degrade spatial resolution independently of detector size

  • Describe block detector and Anger-logic positioning, including how crystal-of-interaction and depth-of-interaction encoding reduce parallax error at the edge of the field of view

Your checkpoint

A one-page annotated block diagram of the PET signal chain with at least 12 labeled components and a 10-row scintillator comparison table

Week 2

PET instrumentation and physics

  • Explain true, scattered, and random coincidence events and compute NECR-style trade-offs when changing energy window, timing window, and activity

  • Distinguish 2D septa-extended versus 3D acquisition in terms of sensitivity, scatter fraction, and count-rate behavior

  • Walk through sinogram and list-mode data organization, including how line-of-response data are binned, normalized, and corrected for attenuation and dead time

  • Compare iterative reconstruction (OSEM and its time-of-flight variant) with filtered back projection in terms of noise, convergence, and lesion detectability

  • Identify the physical cause and correction strategy for each major artifact: attenuation, scatter, randoms, dead time, and motion

Your checkpoint

A worked calculation set of 5 problems covering randoms rate, NECR comparison, and timing-window scatter trade-off, each with stated assumptions and a final numeric answer

Week 3

PET radiopharmaceuticals

  • Diagram the cyclotron production route for F-18 and the synthesis sequence that yields FDG, naming the precursor, the labeling step, and the purification step

  • List the quality-control release tests for FDG (radiochemical purity, radionuclidic purity, pH, residual solvent, sterility, endotoxin, half-life verification) and state the acceptance criterion for each

  • Calculate decay-corrected activity at injection time from calibration activity and elapsed time, and calculate the volume to draw for a prescribed dose

  • Explain how radiopharmaceutical biodistribution determines normal physiologic uptake patterns in brain, myocardium, liver, spleen, bowel, and urinary tract

  • Compare FDG with non-FDG PET agents (for example Ga-68 DOTATATE, F-18 NaF, and amyloid agents) by mechanism, indication, and normal distribution

Your checkpoint

A dose-calculation worksheet with 6 decay and volume problems plus a QC release checklist table listing test, method, and acceptance limit for FDG

Week 4

PET radiopharmaceuticals & PET quality control, safety, and regulations

  • Apply radiopharmaceutical handling rules: shielded syringe handling, patient identification against the dose label, and independent verification before administration

  • Sequence the patient preparation steps for FDG PET (fasting, glucose check, resting uptake period, activity avoidance, hydration) and justify each step physiologically

  • Explain how brown fat, muscle uptake, and recent chemotherapy or radiation alter FDG distribution and what the technologist can do to reduce confounding

  • Describe the receiving, storage, and spill-response procedures for an incoming radiopharmaceutical shipment, including survey and wipe-test steps

Your checkpoint

A patient preparation and dose-administration SOP outline of at least 15 numbered steps with a rationale note for each step

Week 5

PET clinical imaging procedures

  • Build a protocol comparison of whole-body, brain, and cardiac FDG PET covering uptake time, patient positioning, field of view, and reconstruction parameters

  • Specify the acquisition and processing parameters that affect image quality (bed overlap, scan duration per bed, matrix size, and reconstruction iterations) and predict the effect of changing each

  • Identify the CT parameters used for attenuation correction versus diagnostic CT and explain why oral or IV contrast requires attention in the AC workflow

  • Recognize common artifacts on PET/CT images and trace each to its cause in acquisition, patient motion, or reconstruction

Your checkpoint

A protocol comparison table for 3 study types with at least 8 parameters per column and a 6-artifact troubleshooting chart

Week 6

PET clinical imaging procedures & PET quality control, safety, and regulations

  • Interpret SUV: compute it from activity concentration, injected dose, and body weight, and state the factors that make SUV non-comparable across scans

  • Describe how to evaluate image quality objectively using phantom or uniform-region metrics and how to document an unacceptable scan

  • Outline the daily, weekly, and periodic QC schedule for a PET/CT system, naming the test, the tool used, and the pass criterion for each

  • Explain the radiation safety program elements that apply to PET staff and patients: dosimetry, time-distance-shielding, ALARA practices, and release criteria

Your checkpoint

A 10-item QC calendar table (test, frequency, tool, acceptance criterion, action if failed) plus 3 solved SUV problems with interpretation statements

Week 7

PET quality control, safety, and regulations

  • Summarize the regulatory framework governing PET radiopharmaceuticals and imaging facilities, including the roles of NRC agreement states, FDA, and institutional radiation safety committees

  • State the recordkeeping, survey, and package-monitoring requirements that a PET technologist must document and how long records are retained

  • Apply patient release criteria and explain how administered activity, dose rate, and instructions to the patient interact

  • Describe the corrective action path for a failed QC test, a misadministered dose, or an equipment malfunction, naming who is notified and what is documented

Your checkpoint

A one-page regulatory quick-reference sheet covering survey frequency, record retention, release criteria, and reporting pathways, each with its source authority

Week 8

PET instrumentation and physics & PET radiopharmaceuticals & PET clinical imaging procedures & PET quality control, safety, and regulations

  • Consolidate all four domains into a weighted review that spends the most time on any domain scoring below 75 percent on prior practice sets

  • Rehearse missed-item analysis: classify each error as knowledge gap, misread question, or calculation slip, and log the corrective action

  • Recompute the highest-yield formulas (decay, SUV, NECR, dose volume) from memory under time pressure

  • Simulate a timed mixed-domain test and review every item before the exam date

Your checkpoint

A scored full-length practice test with an error log of every missed item categorized by cause and domain

Milestones