NMTCB PET study plan
NMTCB PET · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
PET instrumentation and physics
Map the full PET detection chain from annihilation photon to list-mode event, labeling each conversion step and where energy, timing, and position information are extracted
Compare scintillator properties (light yield, decay time, stopping power, energy resolution) across LSO, LYSO, BGO, and GSO and state which property drives each performance trade-off
Derive why 511 keV annihilation produces two colinear photons and explain how non-colinearity and positron range degrade spatial resolution independently of detector size
Describe block detector and Anger-logic positioning, including how crystal-of-interaction and depth-of-interaction encoding reduce parallax error at the edge of the field of view
Your checkpoint
A one-page annotated block diagram of the PET signal chain with at least 12 labeled components and a 10-row scintillator comparison table
PET instrumentation and physics
Explain true, scattered, and random coincidence events and compute NECR-style trade-offs when changing energy window, timing window, and activity
Distinguish 2D septa-extended versus 3D acquisition in terms of sensitivity, scatter fraction, and count-rate behavior
Walk through sinogram and list-mode data organization, including how line-of-response data are binned, normalized, and corrected for attenuation and dead time
Compare iterative reconstruction (OSEM and its time-of-flight variant) with filtered back projection in terms of noise, convergence, and lesion detectability
Identify the physical cause and correction strategy for each major artifact: attenuation, scatter, randoms, dead time, and motion
Your checkpoint
A worked calculation set of 5 problems covering randoms rate, NECR comparison, and timing-window scatter trade-off, each with stated assumptions and a final numeric answer
PET radiopharmaceuticals
Diagram the cyclotron production route for F-18 and the synthesis sequence that yields FDG, naming the precursor, the labeling step, and the purification step
List the quality-control release tests for FDG (radiochemical purity, radionuclidic purity, pH, residual solvent, sterility, endotoxin, half-life verification) and state the acceptance criterion for each
Calculate decay-corrected activity at injection time from calibration activity and elapsed time, and calculate the volume to draw for a prescribed dose
Explain how radiopharmaceutical biodistribution determines normal physiologic uptake patterns in brain, myocardium, liver, spleen, bowel, and urinary tract
Compare FDG with non-FDG PET agents (for example Ga-68 DOTATATE, F-18 NaF, and amyloid agents) by mechanism, indication, and normal distribution
Your checkpoint
A dose-calculation worksheet with 6 decay and volume problems plus a QC release checklist table listing test, method, and acceptance limit for FDG
PET radiopharmaceuticals & PET quality control, safety, and regulations
Apply radiopharmaceutical handling rules: shielded syringe handling, patient identification against the dose label, and independent verification before administration
Sequence the patient preparation steps for FDG PET (fasting, glucose check, resting uptake period, activity avoidance, hydration) and justify each step physiologically
Explain how brown fat, muscle uptake, and recent chemotherapy or radiation alter FDG distribution and what the technologist can do to reduce confounding
Describe the receiving, storage, and spill-response procedures for an incoming radiopharmaceutical shipment, including survey and wipe-test steps
Your checkpoint
A patient preparation and dose-administration SOP outline of at least 15 numbered steps with a rationale note for each step
PET clinical imaging procedures
Build a protocol comparison of whole-body, brain, and cardiac FDG PET covering uptake time, patient positioning, field of view, and reconstruction parameters
Specify the acquisition and processing parameters that affect image quality (bed overlap, scan duration per bed, matrix size, and reconstruction iterations) and predict the effect of changing each
Identify the CT parameters used for attenuation correction versus diagnostic CT and explain why oral or IV contrast requires attention in the AC workflow
Recognize common artifacts on PET/CT images and trace each to its cause in acquisition, patient motion, or reconstruction
Your checkpoint
A protocol comparison table for 3 study types with at least 8 parameters per column and a 6-artifact troubleshooting chart
PET clinical imaging procedures & PET quality control, safety, and regulations
Interpret SUV: compute it from activity concentration, injected dose, and body weight, and state the factors that make SUV non-comparable across scans
Describe how to evaluate image quality objectively using phantom or uniform-region metrics and how to document an unacceptable scan
Outline the daily, weekly, and periodic QC schedule for a PET/CT system, naming the test, the tool used, and the pass criterion for each
Explain the radiation safety program elements that apply to PET staff and patients: dosimetry, time-distance-shielding, ALARA practices, and release criteria
Your checkpoint
A 10-item QC calendar table (test, frequency, tool, acceptance criterion, action if failed) plus 3 solved SUV problems with interpretation statements
PET quality control, safety, and regulations
Summarize the regulatory framework governing PET radiopharmaceuticals and imaging facilities, including the roles of NRC agreement states, FDA, and institutional radiation safety committees
State the recordkeeping, survey, and package-monitoring requirements that a PET technologist must document and how long records are retained
Apply patient release criteria and explain how administered activity, dose rate, and instructions to the patient interact
Describe the corrective action path for a failed QC test, a misadministered dose, or an equipment malfunction, naming who is notified and what is documented
Your checkpoint
A one-page regulatory quick-reference sheet covering survey frequency, record retention, release criteria, and reporting pathways, each with its source authority
PET instrumentation and physics & PET radiopharmaceuticals & PET clinical imaging procedures & PET quality control, safety, and regulations
Consolidate all four domains into a weighted review that spends the most time on any domain scoring below 75 percent on prior practice sets
Rehearse missed-item analysis: classify each error as knowledge gap, misread question, or calculation slip, and log the corrective action
Recompute the highest-yield formulas (decay, SUV, NECR, dose volume) from memory under time pressure
Simulate a timed mixed-domain test and review every item before the exam date
Your checkpoint
A scored full-length practice test with an error log of every missed item categorized by cause and domain