The Hotel in the Community Forest
Chhahare Community Forest covers 640 hectares and is managed by a user group of 92 households. Around 18,000 trekkers pass through it each year, paying camping and entry fees that gave the group NPR 4.2 million last season. Waste collected after the season came to 1.5 tonnes of glass, plastic and tin that porters had to carry out, and 60 per cent of households still cook on firewood collected in the forest. Twelve households run homestays, eight of them at the trailhead where the bus stops, while households at the upper end of the trail earn only from portering. A Kathmandu-based investor now proposes a 30-room hotel on 0.5 hectares of community forest land under a 20-year lease, offering NPR 1.2 million a year and 25 local jobs. The general assembly meets next week; younger members want the money, older members want visitor numbers capped.
1. Should the user group approve the lease as proposed? Give a conditional decision rather than a simple yes or no.
Read the worked answer
Reject this version; approve a smaller, conditional one.
Scale test. The forest already produces 1.5 tonnes of waste per season and 60 per cent of households still burn firewood. A 30-room hotel adds roughly 60 to 90 beds, increasing waste and water demand by a third or more, and the proposal contains no treatment or waste plan. That cost is real and falls on the user group.
Legal and land test. Community forest land is held for forest management, not for real estate. Any lease of 0.5 hectares for 20 years must be consistent with the forest management plan and approved by the general assembly under the Forest Act; if the plan does not permit commercial construction, the lease is void however good the money looks.
Value test. NPR 1.2 million against existing fee income of NPR 4.2 million is modest, and 25 jobs is a promise, not a contract term. Twenty years fixes a weak price against rising trekker numbers.
Conditions that would make it acceptable: a 5-year renewable lease; waste and wastewater treatment at the investor's cost; written local employment and porterage clauses; a homestay credit fund for upper-trail households; and an annual independent visitor-capacity review.
2. Analyse who gains and who loses under the proposal as written. How should that change the conditions?
Read the worked answer
Gainers. The investor gains a 20-year asset on land the group owns. Trailhead households gain, because eight of the twelve homestays are already there and a hotel brings more traffic to the same spot. Younger members with no land gain seasonal jobs, and the user group gains NPR 1.2 million.
Losers. Upper-trail households lose twice: trekkers with a comfortable hotel at the trailhead have less reason to walk up and stay overnight, so camping fees and portering work fall, and they have no hotel wages to replace it. Women collecting firewood lose if forest rules tighten without a cooking-fuel alternative. Everyone loses if waste increases and the group pays for removal.
Why this changes the decision. The proposal redistributes income from the upper trail to the trailhead and to the investor. Consent from the losers is the test of a fair decision.
Adjusted conditions. Ring-fence a fixed share of the lease income for upper-trail households and a community homestay fund; require the investor to buy portering and food supplies from the settlement; require an LPG or improved-stove subsidy so firewood pressure falls; cap beds rather than trekkers, since beds, not footfall, drive waste.
3. What information must the general assembly obtain before voting, and why can the vote not be taken on the investor's presentation alone?
Read the worked answer
Data required before the vote. (1) The current forest management plan and whether it allows construction on the proposed plot. (2) The precise plot on a map, its forest type and whether it is on a water source or a breeding area. (3) A waste and water estimate: litres per bed per day, and who removes solid waste and at what cost. (4) An independent valuation of 0.5 hectares of forest land for 20 years, so NPR 1.2 million can be judged rather than admired. (5) A written draft lease with employment, waste, termination and renewal clauses. (6) Baseline figures for trekker nights and earnings at the upper trail, so the effect can be measured later.
Why not the presentation alone. A slide shows revenue and jobs but not cost, land value or distribution. The assembly is deciding property rights for 20 years and cannot correct a bad decision next season.
Procedure. Circulate the papers at least seven days ahead, record the vote household by household, and minute the dissent so the decision can be reviewed.