The Brunch Cook Who Was Up All Night
Sunday brunch starts at 10:00 a.m. At 8:05 a.m. the line cook, Marco, arrives for his shift and tells the supervisor he was up all night with vomiting and diarrhea but feels 'totally fine now.' He is the only cook scheduled and the restaurant has 90 covers booked. Marco also has a knife cut on his right thumb from Saturday, closed with a blue adhesive bandage that is neither waterproof nor covered by a glove. The hand sink at the prep line is stacked with a cutting board and a bag of flour; the nearest working hand sink is in the dish pit, about 15 m away through a swinging door. A 70% alcohol hand rub dispenser is mounted at the line. Marco says he will 'just use the sanitizer' and starts getting ready to bread chicken for the fried chicken special.
1. Should the supervisor let Marco work the brunch shift? Explain the decision using exclusion criteria, and identify who else must be notified.
Read the worked answer
No - he must be excluded from the food premises.
The reasoning. Vomiting and diarrhea within the previous 24–48 hours is a textbook presentation for norovirus, which has a very low infectious dose (as few as 10–100 virus particles) and is spread by hands, food, and surfaces. Shedding continues after symptoms stop, so 'I feel fine now' is the wrong question. A food handler with gastrointestinal symptoms must be excluded from handling food, clean utensils, and food-contact surfaces. Typical return-to-work direction from Ontario medical officers of health is at least 24–48 hours symptom-free (48 hours for suspected norovirus), and the local health unit's guidance should be confirmed.
What the supervisor must do.
- Send Marco home, and document the date, symptoms, and decision.
- Notify the operator, not just deal with it at shift level - the operator holds the legal duty to ensure food is not contaminated, and staffing pressure is not a defence.
- Cover the shift some other way, even if it means a limited menu. A restricted brunch is a business cost; a norovirus outbreak traced to the restaurant is a closure risk.
- Ask whether anyone else has been sick, and whether two or more customers or staff are linked to the same illness. A suspected foodborne illness in a food premise is reportable to the medical officer of health under the Health Protection and Promotion Act.
- Do not assign him cleaning work in the kitchen as a compromise - he would still be handling equipment and touching shared surfaces.
The trap in the scenario is the phrase 'only cook scheduled.' Exclusion rules do not bend for scheduling, and using the alcohol rub instead of handwashing does not make an infectious handler safe.
2. The prep-line hand sink is blocked and the only other sink is in the dish pit. Describe what an acceptable handwash looks like, when it is required, and whether the hand rub can substitute.
Read the worked answer
What an acceptable handwash looks like. A dedicated handwashing sink must be unobstructed, used only for handwashing, and stocked with liquid soap, paper towels, and hot and cold running water. The procedure: wet hands; apply soap; lather and scrub for at least 15–20 seconds, covering palms, backs of hands, between the fingers, thumbs, fingertips, under the nails (nailbrush where provided), and wrists; rinse under running water; dry with a single-use paper towel; use that towel to turn off the taps and open the door.
When it is required. Before starting work; after any toilet use; after handling raw meat, poultry, fish, or eggs; after touching the face, hair, phone, or garbage; after cleaning or handling chemicals; after breaks; and any time hands become contaminated or visibly soiled. The whole point is that hands are washed in place - a 15 m walk through a swinging door past the dish pit is enough friction that handwashing quietly stops happening.
The sink must be cleared immediately. A hand sink used to store a cutting board and a bag of flour is not a hand sink in practice, and an inspector will treat it as a violation. The board and flour move to the prep area, and anyone who stacks items there again is creating the same hazard.
The hand rub is not a substitute. Alcohol-based rubs are a temporary measure at best: they do not work on visibly soiled or greasy hands, and they are poor against norovirus, which is exactly the risk in this scenario. In a food premise, soap and running water are required, and the sanitizer dispenser does not satisfy the handwashing obligation.
3. Marco's cut is on his thumb. What must happen before he touches any ready-to-eat food?
Read the worked answer
The wound-and-glove rule.
- Cover it completely with a waterproof dressing - a brightly coloured adhesive bandage is preferred because a lost bandage is easier to spot in food than a flesh-toned one. A cloth bandage that soaks through is not adequate.
- Put a single-use glove over the covered wound before handling food. The glove does not replace the bandage; the two go together.
- Re-wash hands before applying the bandage and before gloving.
- Change the bandage and glove whenever the dressing becomes wet, soiled, or loose, and at every transition between raw and ready-to-eat food.
- Report the wound to the supervisor, who is responsible for the decision. If the wound cannot be completely covered and protected, the handler must be moved away from food and food-contact surfaces entirely.
- Watch for infection. Redness, swelling, pus, or tenderness around a cut means the handler must be excluded until it is resolved - a cut colonized with Staphylococcus aureus is a direct route into ready-to-eat food.
Why the glove matters more here than usual. Marco's task is breading chicken, but the shift will also involve plating garnishes, touching bun tops, and handling clean utensils. A bare bandaged thumb in a bowl of breadcrumbs or on a plate of fries is a physical-contamination and pathogen risk at the same time. The correct answer is not 'skip the chicken and do dishes' - it is bandage, glove, and reassess at each task change.