I85PREP
⌘ K
GCLE study materials
GCLE study resources

GCLE practice questions

One question at a time. Build your GCLE understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Which source of law is enacted by a legislature and formally recorded as a statute?

  1. A regulation issued by an agency
  2. A statute Correct answer.
  3. A local custom
  4. A judicial precedent

Explanation

Statutes are formal written laws enacted by a legislative body following its prescribed procedure. Regulations are issued by administrative agencies, precedents are created by courts, and customs are unwritten practices.

Question 2Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Which principle requires a court to follow a rule established in an earlier case by a court of equal or higher rank?

  1. Res judicata
  2. Mens rea
  3. Stare decisis Correct answer.
  4. Habeas corpus

Explanation

Stare decisis is the doctrine that courts should stand by decided matters and follow precedent within the same hierarchy. Res judicata concerns the finality of a decided case between the parties, while mens rea and habeas corpus are unrelated concepts.

Question 3Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

In a civil law system, the primary source of law is best described as:

  1. Jury determinations of fact
  2. Binding case precedent
  3. Comprehensive codified legislation Correct answer.
  4. Customary practice of local courts

Explanation

Civil law systems are built around comprehensive codes that set out general rules for courts to apply. Judicial decisions generally have persuasive rather than strictly binding force, and juries are not the source of legal rules.

Question 4Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

A decision by a superior court in the same judicial hierarchy is generally:

  1. Binding only on the parties to that case
  2. Advisory for future courts
  3. Persuasive only and never binding
  4. Binding precedent on lower courts Correct answer.

Explanation

Under vertical stare decisis, lower courts within the same hierarchy must follow decisions of superior courts. The binding effect extends beyond the original parties to future cases presenting the same legal issue.

Question 5Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Which branch of government is primarily responsible for enacting legislation?

  1. The judiciary
  2. The legislature Correct answer.
  3. An independent regulatory agency
  4. The executive

Explanation

In the standard separation of powers, the legislature enacts statutes, the executive implements and enforces them, and the judiciary interprets and applies them. Agencies exercise delegated authority rather than original legislative power.

Question 6Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

When a statute's wording is clear and unambiguous, a court applying the plain meaning rule will generally:

  1. Choose the interpretation that best serves public policy
  2. Defer to the agency's preferred reading
  3. Consult legislative history first
  4. Apply the ordinary meaning of the words Correct answer.

Explanation

The plain meaning rule directs courts to give statutory words their ordinary meaning when the text is clear. Recourse to legislative history, policy preferences, or agency views is generally unnecessary in that situation.

Question 7Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

An administrative agency's authority to issue binding regulations generally comes from:

  1. A vote of the registered public
  2. A delegation of authority by the legislature Correct answer.
  3. Its own inherent constitutional power
  4. Judicial appointment

Explanation

Agencies derive rulemaking power from an enabling statute in which the legislature delegates authority. They have no inherent constitutional power to legislate, and public votes do not ordinarily confer rulemaking authority.

Question 8Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

The power of a court to invalidate a legislative act that conflicts with the constitution is known as:

  1. Judicial review Correct answer.
  2. Certiorari
  3. Original jurisdiction
  4. Mandamus

Explanation

Judicial review is the authority of courts to assess legislation and executive action against the constitution and to set aside what is incompatible. Original jurisdiction and certiorari concern which court hears a matter, and mandamus is an order compelling official action.

Question 9Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

In many legal systems, after the executive negotiates and signs a treaty, the treaty typically requires which step to become binding domestically?

  1. Publication by an administrative agency alone
  2. Approval by the highest court
  3. Approval by the legislature in accordance with national procedures Correct answer.
  4. A national referendum in all cases

Explanation

Treaty ratification generally follows the constitutional procedures of each state, which commonly require legislative approval after executive signature. Courts do not ratify treaties, and referenda or agency publication are not the standard requirement.

Question 10Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Which source ranks highest in a typical domestic legal hierarchy?

  1. Administrative regulation
  2. Municipal ordinance
  3. Constitutional provisions Correct answer.
  4. Statute

Explanation

Constitutional provisions sit at the apex of the domestic legal order, and other norms must conform to them. Statutes rank below the constitution but above regulations and local ordinances.

Question 11Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

A court's authority to hear a particular type of case, such as bankruptcy or family matters, is called:

  1. Territorial jurisdiction
  2. Personal jurisdiction
  3. Subject-matter jurisdiction Correct answer.
  4. Appellate jurisdiction

Explanation

Subject-matter jurisdiction is the court's power over the category of dispute before it. Personal and territorial jurisdiction concern the parties and geography, while appellate jurisdiction concerns review of lower decisions.

Question 12Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

In a criminal proceeding, the prosecution generally must prove guilt:

  1. By a preponderance of the evidence
  2. Beyond a reasonable doubt Correct answer.
  3. By substantial evidence
  4. By clear and convincing evidence

Explanation

The criminal standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt because the consequences for the accused are severe. Preponderance and clear and convincing evidence are civil standards, and substantial evidence is a standard for reviewing administrative findings.

Question 13Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

A lower court may avoid following a precedent by:

  1. Asking the legislature to dismiss the case
  2. Issuing a press release rejecting it
  3. Distinguishing the material facts of the current case from those in the precedent Correct answer.
  4. Ignoring the precedent without explanation

Explanation

A court distinguishes a precedent when the facts before it differ materially from those that generated the earlier rule, so the rule does not control. A lower court cannot simply ignore binding authority, and public statements or legislative dismissal are not judicial techniques.

Question 14Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Compared with a statute, a regulation is typically:

  1. Created only by constitutional amendment
  2. Enacted by the legislature through the ordinary legislative process
  3. Binding only on the agency that issued it
  4. Issued by an administrative agency under authority granted by a statute Correct answer.

Explanation

Regulations are subordinate instruments adopted by agencies using powers delegated by an enabling statute. They generally bind regulated parties and the public, not merely the issuing agency.

Question 15Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Which is an example of a check by the judiciary on the other branches?

  1. The legislature overriding a veto
  2. A court declaring an executive action unconstitutional Correct answer.
  3. An agency issuing a rule
  4. The executive appointing judges

Explanation

Judicial review allows courts to hold executive or legislative action invalid when it exceeds or violates the constitution. The other examples involve legislative or executive action rather than a judicial check.

Question 16Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

The body of law developed by courts through decisions rather than by the legislature is known as:

  1. Statutory law
  2. Constitutional law
  3. Common law Correct answer.
  4. Administrative law

Explanation

Common law is judge-made law that develops incrementally through court decisions and precedent. Statutory, constitutional, and administrative law originate from legislatures, constitutions, and agencies respectively.

Question 17Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

When two valid statutes conflict, the principle that the more specific provision prevails over the more general one is expressed by:

  1. Lex posterior derogat legi priori
  2. Lex specialis derogat legi generali Correct answer.
  3. Nulla poena sine lege
  4. Pacta sunt servanda

Explanation

Lex specialis derogat legi generali means the special rule prevails over the general rule. Lex posterior addresses conflicting rules adopted at different times, while the other maxims concern criminal legality and treaty performance.

Question 18Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

To establish a rule of customary international law, generally required are:

  1. A resolution of the UN Security Council only
  2. A unanimous vote of the General Assembly
  3. Consistent state practice and opinio juris Correct answer.
  4. A treaty signature and ratification by all states

Explanation

Customary international law arises from widespread and consistent state practice accompanied by a belief that the practice is legally required (opinio juris). Treaty ratification, Security Council resolutions, or General Assembly votes may evidence these elements but are not themselves the test.

Question 19Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

In the legal order of the European Union, the principle of subsidiarity provides that the Union acts:

  1. Whenever the European Parliament decides
  2. Only in matters of exclusive competence
  3. Only when all member states agree unanimously
  4. Only where objectives cannot be sufficiently achieved by member states and can be better achieved at Union level Correct answer.

Explanation

Subsidiarity governs areas of shared competence and permits Union action only when member states cannot sufficiently achieve the objective and Union-level action adds value. It does not apply to areas of exclusive Union competence.

Question 20Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Under the interpretive canon ejusdem generis, when a statute lists specific items followed by a general term, the general term is read to:

  1. Apply only to the first listed item
  2. Cover other items of the same kind as those listed Correct answer.
  3. Include every possible item
  4. Exclude all items not expressly listed

Explanation

Ejusdem generis limits a general catch-all term to things of the same class as the specific items that precede it. It neither expands the term to everything nor restricts it to only the listed examples.

Question 21Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

In a civil lawsuit, the party who initiates the case is called the:

  1. Respondent
  2. Plaintiff Correct answer.
  3. Appellant
  4. Defendant

Explanation

The plaintiff files the civil action and bears the initial burden of stating and proving the claim. The defendant responds, while appellant and respondent describe parties in an appeal.

Question 22Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

When a higher court explicitly rejects a prior precedent and replaces it with a new rule, the court is said to:

  1. Distinguish the precedent
  2. Remand the precedent
  3. Overrule the precedent Correct answer.
  4. Affirm the precedent

Explanation

Overruling occurs when a court with authority declares that an earlier precedent is no longer good law. Distinguishing leaves the precedent intact but inapplicable, affirming upholds it, and remanding sends a case back to a lower court.

Question 23Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

Which document typically establishes the fundamental structure of government and limits its powers?

  1. A constitution Correct answer.
  2. A contract
  3. A regulation
  4. A statute

Explanation

A constitution establishes governmental institutions, allocates powers, and typically protects fundamental rights against government action. Statutes, regulations, and contracts operate within that framework.

Question 24Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

A regulatory agency that finds a violation typically has authority to:

  1. Override a court judgment
  2. Impose criminal imprisonment without a court
  3. Amend the constitution
  4. Impose administrative sanctions such as fines, subject to legal safeguards Correct answer.

Explanation

Agencies commonly enforce regulatory regimes through administrative sanctions, including fines and remedial orders, while remaining subject to procedural safeguards and judicial review. Deprivation of liberty generally requires criminal proceedings in a court.

Question 25Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

The principle by which courts in one country may recognize and give effect to the laws or judgments of another country out of deference, rather than obligation, is called:

  1. Comity Correct answer.
  2. Extradition
  3. Sovereign immunity
  4. Act of state doctrine

Explanation

Comity reflects mutual deference among sovereign states and may lead a court to recognize foreign laws or judgments as a matter of respect, not strict legal duty. Sovereign immunity and the act of state doctrine limit adjudication of certain foreign-state matters, and extradition concerns surrender of persons.

Question 26Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

In a civil-law system, the primary and generally authoritative source of legal rules is:

  1. Advisory opinions issued by scholarly commentators
  2. Customary practices observed by local merchants alone
  3. Comprehensive codes enacted by the legislature Correct answer.
  4. Judicial decisions compiled in published case reporters

Explanation

Civil-law systems trace their authority to codified legislation, and courts are expected to apply the code rather than to create rules case by case. Judicial decisions may guide interpretation but do not carry the same formal authority as the code. Custom and scholarship operate only as secondary aids.

Question 27Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

A plaintiff sues a former business partner to recover an unpaid invoice. To prevail at trial, the plaintiff must establish the claim by:

  1. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. Clear and convincing evidence
  3. A preponderance of the evidence Correct answer.
  4. Probable cause supported by sworn affidavit

Explanation

The ordinary standard of proof in a civil action for money is a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the claim is more likely true than not. Heightened civil standards such as clear and convincing evidence apply only in specific categories of cases. Beyond a reasonable doubt is reserved for criminal guilt.

Question 28Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

A federal statute expressly declares that it occupies the entire field of hazardous-waste labeling. A state then enacts its own labeling rule covering the same materials. The state rule is most likely:

  1. Invalid, because the federal statute preempts the field Correct answer.
  2. Valid, because states may always impose standards stricter than federal ones
  3. Valid, because labeling falls within the states' traditional police power
  4. Invalid, unless the state first obtains approval from the federal agency

Explanation

Under the supremacy of federal law, a federal statute that expressly occupies a field displaces state law on that subject, even where the state rule is more demanding. The state's general police power does not permit it to regulate where Congress has taken the field. No agency approval step is required for preemption to operate.

Question 29Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

After applying the ordinary tools of statutory interpretation, a criminal statute remains genuinely ambiguous about whether certain conduct is covered. Under the rule of lenity, the court should:

  1. Defer to the interpretation advanced by the agency enforcing the statute
  2. Resolve the doubt by examining the statute's legislative history
  3. Adopt the reading that best advances the statute's underlying purpose
  4. Adopt the interpretation most favorable to the accused Correct answer.

Explanation

The rule of lenity directs that lingering ambiguity in a penal statute be resolved in favor of the defendant, because fair notice requires that the law speak clearly before imposing punishment. It applies only after the standard interpretive tools have been exhausted without resolving the doubt.

Question 30Legal Systems and Regulatory Frameworks

An appellate court affirms a sanctions order solely because the notice was mailed to the wrong address. The opinion then adds that agencies "probably lack authority over informal guidance" in general. In later litigation, that additional statement is best treated as:

  1. Binding authority because it appears in a published opinion
  2. Persuasive dictum that does not bind lower courts Correct answer.
  3. Binding on every court within the same state but nowhere else
  4. A rule with the force of law until formally repealed

Explanation

Only the rule necessary to the court's result, together with the facts and reasoning essential to it, constitutes the holding that later courts must follow. A broader proposition offered beyond what the outcome required is obiter dictum, which may persuade but does not bind. The tentative phrasing reinforces that it was not the ground of decision.

Question 31Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Which statement correctly states the requirement of consideration for a bilateral contract?

  1. Consideration is unnecessary whenever the parties clearly intend their agreement to be legally binding and sign it.
  2. A moral duty to keep a promise always supplies consideration.
  3. Consideration requires a bargained-for exchange in which the promisee incurs a detriment or the promisor receives a benefit. Correct answer.
  4. A written promise is binding even when the promisor receives nothing in return.

Explanation

Consideration is a bargained-for exchange: the promise must induce the return promise or performance, and that return must induce the promise. Neither a writing nor the parties' subjective intent substitutes for this exchange. A mere moral duty generally does not count as consideration.

Question 32Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under UCC Article 2, which statement about a merchant's firm offer is correct?

  1. A merchant's firm offer remains irrevocable indefinitely if it states no duration and the merchant is a dealer in the goods.
  2. A firm offer must be supported by separate consideration paid by the buyer to the merchant.
  3. Only a consumer, not a merchant dealing in the goods, can make an irrevocable firm offer under Article 2.
  4. A signed assurance that an offer will be held open is irrevocable for the stated period, up to three months, without consideration. Correct answer.

Explanation

UCC § 2-205 makes a merchant's signed assurance that an offer will be held open irrevocable without consideration. If no period is stated, the offer remains open for a reasonable time, but never longer than three months.

Question 33Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under the common law mailbox rule, when is an acceptance by mail generally effective?

  1. When the acceptance is received by the offeror.
  2. When the offeror actually reads the acceptance.
  3. When the acceptance is dispatched, unless the offer provides otherwise. Correct answer.
  4. Only after the offeror acknowledges receipt in writing.

Explanation

The mailbox rule makes an acceptance effective upon dispatch, provided the acceptance is properly addressed and the offer does not specify a different mode or time. This allocation protects the accepting party once it has given up control of the acceptance.

Question 34Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under UCC Article 2, a contract for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more is enforceable when:

  1. a writing indicates a contract and is signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Correct answer.
  2. the seller has begun manufacturing the goods specifically for the buyer and cannot resell them in the ordinary course.
  3. the parties have shaken hands in the presence of a witness.
  4. the buyer has paid a deposit of any amount.

Explanation

UCC § 2-201 requires a writing sufficient to indicate a contract for sale, signed by the party to be charged, for goods priced at $500 or more. Payment or delivery can satisfy the statute only to the extent of the goods paid for or received.

Question 35Contracts and Commercial Transactions

The CISG governs a contract for the international sale of goods when:

  1. the goods are manufactured in a Contracting State even though both parties have their places of business in the same non-Contracting State.
  2. the contract is concluded in a Contracting State, regardless of the parties' places of business.
  3. the parties' places of business are in different Contracting States, or private international law leads to a Contracting State's law. Correct answer.
  4. the parties have their places of business in the same State but the goods are later resold abroad.

Explanation

CISG Article 1 applies when the parties' places of business are in different Contracting States or when conflict-of-laws rules lead to the law of a Contracting State. The place of manufacture alone or the place of conclusion alone does not trigger the Convention.

Question 36Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under UCC Article 2, the implied warranty of merchantability arises when:

  1. a merchant who deals in goods of that kind sells them, unless the warranty is properly excluded or modified. Correct answer.
  2. any seller, merchant or not, sells goods in the ordinary course.
  3. the buyer inspects the goods before purchase.
  4. the seller gives a written express warranty covering the goods and the buyer relies on that warranty in making the purchase.

Explanation

The implied warranty of merchantability applies when a merchant who deals in goods of that kind sells them, and it promises that the goods are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. It can be excluded or modified only in the manner Article 2 allows.

Question 37Contracts and Commercial Transactions

A buyer offers to purchase goods for $10,000. The seller replies, "I accept, but the price is $11,000." What is the legal effect under common law?

  1. The reply is a counteroffer that terminates the buyer's original offer. Correct answer.
  2. The reply is an acceptance at $11,000 because it is definite.
  3. A binding contract exists at $10,000 because the seller accepted.
  4. The reply has no effect on the original offer, which remains open.

Explanation

At common law, an acceptance must match the offer exactly; a purported acceptance that changes a material term such as price is a counteroffer. A counteroffer operates as a rejection and terminates the original offer.

Question 38Contracts and Commercial Transactions

A condition precedent in a contract is best described as:

  1. a statement that the contract is not binding until both parties sign.
  2. a term that excuses all performance if either party is dissatisfied.
  3. an event that must occur before a party's duty to perform becomes due. Correct answer.
  4. a promise that must be performed after the other party's duty arises.

Explanation

A condition precedent is an event or state of affairs that must occur before a party's contractual duty becomes enforceable. It differs from a promise, which creates a duty to perform rather than triggering one.

Question 39Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under UCC Article 2, when a merchant sends an acceptance that adds different or additional terms, those terms normally become part of the contract if:

  1. the added terms appear in a separate document signed by both parties after the original offer.
  2. the offeror remains silent for ten business days after receiving the acceptance and has not previously dealt with the merchant.
  3. they are not material alterations and the offeror has not objected. Correct answer.
  4. the original offer was made by a non-merchant who did not limit acceptance to its own terms.

Explanation

UCC § 2-207(2) treats additional terms in a merchant-to-merchant acceptance as proposals that become part of the contract unless they materially alter it, the offeror objects, or the offer limits acceptance to its own terms. The statute does not use a ten-day silence rule.

Question 40Contracts and Commercial Transactions

If a seller clearly states before the delivery date that it will not perform, the buyer may:

  1. treat the repudiation as a breach, suspend its own performance, and pursue remedies immediately. Correct answer.
  2. cancel the contract only if the seller's statement is in writing.
  3. only wait until the delivery date and then sue for breach.
  4. ignore the statement and later insist on specific performance without any notice.

Explanation

An anticipatory repudiation permits the aggrieved party to treat the repudiation as a breach, suspend its own performance, and seek remedies immediately. Alternatively, the aggrieved party may await performance for a commercially reasonable time, but it is not limited to waiting.

Question 41Contracts and Commercial Transactions

A seller delivers goods that fail in some respect to conform to the contract before the time for performance has expired. Under UCC Article 2, the seller may:

  1. cure only if the nonconformity is a material breach.
  2. cure by giving timely notice and making a conforming delivery within the contract time. Correct answer.
  3. cure only if the buyer agrees to a price reduction.
  4. never cure after delivery has occurred.

Explanation

UCC § 2-508 allows a seller to cure a nonconforming tender before the contract time expires if it gives timely notice and makes a conforming delivery within that time. A price reduction is a buyer's remedy, not a precondition to cure.

Question 42Contracts and Commercial Transactions

A written contract for the sale of machines appears complete but contains no merger clause. In a dispute, a court applying the UCC will:

  1. treat the writing as fully integrated in every case.
  2. admit only evidence of terms that contradict the writing.
  3. exclude all evidence of prior negotiations and agreements even when the evidence is consistent and explanatory.
  4. admit consistent additional terms unless the writing is a complete and exclusive statement of the terms. Correct answer.

Explanation

UCC § 2-202 permits evidence of consistent additional terms unless the writing was intended as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms. Contradictory evidence remains inadmissible, and the absence of a merger clause does not automatically make the writing fully integrated.

Question 43Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Which party may enforce a contract as an intended third-party beneficiary?

  1. A person who learns of the contract after it is signed and relies on it.
  2. A person for whose benefit the contracting parties intended to create an enforceable right. Correct answer.
  3. Any person who receives an incidental benefit from performance.
  4. A person named in the contract only to receive information about performance.

Explanation

Only an intended beneficiary may enforce a contract; incidental beneficiaries cannot. The key question is whether the contracting parties intended to give that person an enforceable right.

Question 44Contracts and Commercial Transactions

An obligor delegates performance of a contractual duty to a third party. What is the general effect?

  1. The delegation discharges the obligor from all further liability.
  2. The delegation is void unless the obligee consents in writing.
  3. The obligee must accept the third party's performance in place of the obligor's.
  4. The obligor remains liable for performance unless the obligee agrees to a novation. Correct answer.

Explanation

Delegation of a duty does not by itself discharge the original obligor. The obligor remains liable unless the obligee agrees to a novation that substitutes the third party.

Question 45Contracts and Commercial Transactions

A liquidated damages clause is enforceable when:

  1. the amount is designed to punish the breaching party for failing to perform rather than to estimate loss.
  2. the clause appears in a standard form and was not negotiated by the parties.
  3. the amount is a reasonable forecast of probable loss and actual loss was difficult to estimate at contract formation. Correct answer.
  4. the amount equals the entire contract price regardless of the loss actually caused.

Explanation

A liquidated damages clause is enforceable if the stipulated amount is a reasonable forecast of probable loss and the actual loss would be difficult to estimate when the contract is formed. A clause designed to punish is an unenforceable penalty.

Question 46Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under the CISG, a buyer who discovers a lack of conformity in delivered goods must:

  1. give notice within a reasonable time and, in any event, within two years of delivery. Correct answer.
  2. reject the goods immediately or lose all remedies.
  3. sue within thirty days of delivery in every case.
  4. notify the seller only if the nonconformity is fundamental.

Explanation

CISG Article 39 requires the buyer to give notice of a lack of conformity within a reasonable time after discovery or after it ought to have discovered the defect. In any event, the buyer loses the right to rely on the defect if notice is not given within two years of delivery, subject to limited exceptions.

Question 47Contracts and Commercial Transactions

In a shipment contract under UCC Article 2, when does the risk of loss pass to the buyer?

  1. When the seller places the goods at the buyer's disposal at the seller's place of business.
  2. When the buyer receives and inspects the goods.
  3. When the seller delivers the goods to the carrier for shipment. Correct answer.
  4. When the buyer pays the purchase price.

Explanation

In a shipment contract, the seller fulfills its delivery obligation by handing the goods to the carrier, and risk of loss passes to the buyer at that point. A destination contract, by contrast, keeps risk with the seller until the goods reach the destination.

Question 48Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Promissory estoppel may make a promise enforceable without consideration when:

  1. the promisee has given nominal consideration of one dollar.
  2. the promise concerns a sale of goods and the parties are merchants.
  3. the promise is in writing and signed by the promisor.
  4. the promisor should reasonably expect reliance, reliance occurs, and enforcement is needed to avoid injustice. Correct answer.

Explanation

Promissory estoppel requires a promise on which the promisor reasonably expects the promisee to rely, actual reliance, and injustice absent enforcement. A writing may help with proof or the statute of frauds but is not the doctrine's core.

Question 49Contracts and Commercial Transactions

Under the CISG, a reply that purports to be an acceptance but contains material modifications to the offer is:

  1. a counteroffer, which the original offeror may accept or reject. Correct answer.
  2. void and of no legal effect.
  3. an acceptance unless the offeror objects within a reasonable time.
  4. an acceptance that binds the parties on the original terms.

Explanation

CISG Article 19 provides that a reply with material modifications is a counteroffer, not an acceptance. The original offeror may then accept or reject that counteroffer.

Question 50Contracts and Commercial Transactions

A court applying UCC Article 2 finds a contract clause unconscionable. What remedy may the court give?

  1. The court must void the entire contract without considering the remaining terms.
  2. The court may only award damages for the unconscionable term.
  3. The court may refuse to enforce the contract, enforce the rest without the clause, or limit the clause's application. Correct answer.
  4. The court must enforce the clause because the parties agreed to it.

Explanation

UCC § 2-302 gives the court flexibility to refuse enforcement, enforce the remainder without the unconscionable clause, or limit the clause's application to avoid an unconscionable result. The court is not limited to a single remedy.