The 1994 Wax and Sound Installation
A museum owns a 1994 installation consisting of 120 kg of beeswax, a suspended copper pipe and a sound piece on a CD player. The artist died in 2008; the estate has supplied a certificate authorising refabrication but no instructions for the sound. The wax has bloomed, the copper is corroded, and the CD player is obsolete; the original CD is scratched. The conservator wants to replace the wax and migrate the audio to a digital file; the curator worries that this changes the work. The estate says the work may be 'installed according to the spirit'. Insurance values the work at EUR 400,000; the museum has EUR 25,000 for conservation and a rehang in eight months.
1. Recommend a conservation approach, applying variable-media and authenticity reasoning. Distinguish the work's score from its material components.
Read the worked answer
Treat the work as a score, not a fixed object. The certificate authorises refabrication but is silent on sound, so first document: interview the estate, former assistants and the original installer; record the wax quantity, pipe dimensions, speaker placement and playback level. Preserve the originals - bloomed wax sample, corroded copper, CD and player - as archival components, not as display. Replace only consumables: new beeswax to the same specification, and clean the copper minimally unless corrosion is part of the intended decay (ask the estate). Do not restore the wax to a pristine look if the work expects change. For the sound, migrate the CD to a digital preservation master, keep the original disc, and use a documented playback chain. If the original player fails, use an identical model or emulation, and record the choice. Budget: documentation and interviews first, then wax and audio, with a contingency. The aim is continuity of the work's identity, not preservation of every molecule.
2. The scratched CD may still play. Should the museum migrate the audio, emulate the original player, or leave the sound silent? Explain the trade-offs.
Read the worked answer
Migrate the audio, but do not treat migration as neutral. A bit-perfect digital copy preserves the signal; it does not preserve the original playback colouration, the CD player's error correction or the physical act of loading a disc. The scratched CD may still play; test it before copying. Make two files: a preservation master (uncompressed, checksummed) and an exhibition copy. Keep the original CD and player in storage with a condition report. In the gallery, decide whether the work's identity depends on the specific device. If yes, source the same model or an emulator and document it; if no, use a modern player but disclose the substitution in the catalogue. Do not choose silence: the sound is part of the installed work, and the estate's 'spirit' wording does not authorise deleting a component. Record the decision so a future curator can reverse or revise it.