I85PREP
⌘ K
PN Level 2 study materials
PN Level 2 study resources

PN Level 2: One-on-one mentorship and real-client problem solving

PN Level 2 · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

One-on-one mentorship and real-client problem solving

One-on-One Mentorship and Real-Client Problem Solving

This domain tests mentoring other coaches and reasoning through complex, messy client situations: stalled progress, adherence gaps, scope-of-practice boundaries, ethical dilemmas and documentation. Expect case vignettes where you must choose the next best coaching or mentoring move.

Core rules:

  • Mentor by building capability, not dependency. Ask reflective questions, use the SBI model (Situation–Behavior–Impact) for feedback, and let the coach generate solutions before you offer yours.
  • Use structured case conceptualization: presenting issue, readiness, barriers, strengths, data (adherence, sleep, stress, intake), and risks. Separate what the client needs from what the coach feels.
  • Stay in scope. Screen for red flags (eating-disorder signs, medical symptoms, severe mental-health concerns, unsafe exercise) and refer to qualified professionals; document referrals and decisions.
  • Model the coaching method: collaborative agenda-setting, autonomy support, and small experiments. Review sessions with evidence, not impressions.
  • Protect the alliance. When clients stall, explore function of behavior, cost of change and confidence; adjust the plan rather than blame motivation.

Worked example

A coach reports: 'My client keeps canceling; I think she's unmotivated.' Mentor resists diagnosing. Ask: What happened before the first cancellation? What does the client say she wants? Review adherence data. Coach discovers the plan required 45-minute gym sessions she cannot fit. Mentor asks the coach to propose options; they test 10-minute home sessions. Mentor gives SBI feedback: 'When you labeled her unmotivated in supervision, it closed off inquiry; when you asked about barriers, you found a fit problem.'

Traps

Taking over the client case; giving clinical or dietetic advice outside scope; skipping risk screening; over-documenting opinions instead of behaviors; using the mentor as a fixer instead of a thinking partner; ignoring the coach's own bias.