Paid Blogger, Deleted Comments, and a Food-Illness Claim
A mid-sized agency represents a meal-kit company that has received six customer complaints of gastrointestinal illness over 10 days. A food-safety blogger with 90,000 followers posts that the company's product made two people sick and asks followers to share their stories. Internal lab tests are inconclusive. The client's marketing director asks the agency to offer the blogger a free year of meals plus a $500 'review fee' in exchange for deleting the post and publishing a positive review; to remove all negative comments from the company's Facebook page; and to have customer service tell callers 'no confirmed illness.' A junior account executive has already drafted a contract with a confidentiality clause. Legal has not been consulted. The agency's code requires transparency, accuracy and disclosure of material connections. You are the senior counselor on the account.
1. Identify the ethical and legal problems in the three requests, and explain what you would do before anyone responds to the blogger or the public.
Read the worked answer
Problems
- Payment for deletion and a positive review is a deceptive endorsement. The $500 'review fee' plus free product is a material connection that must be disclosed; making it contingent on deleting criticism and publishing praise turns it into payment for a predetermined outcome, not a review. The confidentiality clause makes the arrangement worse by hiding it.
- Deleting all negative comments can create a false impression. Moderation of spam or abuse is defensible; removing only criticism while leaving praise is not. Some comments may also be adverse-event reports, which must be preserved and routed to quality and legal.
- 'No confirmed illness' is defensive and misleading if tests are inconclusive. It implies no problem when the company does not know. Customer-service staff should not deny, diagnose or speculate.
Before responding
- Issue a written legal-hold and preservation notice for complaints, lab records, social posts, emails and the draft contract.
- Get legal and quality review; do not send the blogger any offer or threat.
- Establish a single approved factual statement and an escalation path for safety complaints.
- Advise the client in writing that the three requests cannot be executed as proposed and why. This protects the agency and the client, and avoids spoliation or regulatory exposure.
2. Draft the guidance you would give to the client and the account team, including how to handle the blogger, the Facebook comments and the customer-service script.
Read the worked answer
To the client
- Reject the paid-deletion and positive-review contract. If the client wants to engage the blogger, offer a factual response or product information with no payment contingent on content; any compensation, free product or affiliate link must be disclosed. Do not use a confidentiality clause to conceal sponsorship.
- Keep the Facebook page open to criticism. Remove only content that violates a published policy (threats, spam, personal data); preserve screenshots and log moderation decisions. Publish a short response: 'We are aware of reports and are investigating; contact us at [channel].'
- Replace the customer-service script. Approved language: 'We take these reports seriously. We are investigating with our quality team. If you believe you became ill, seek medical advice and contact us at [channel].' Do not say the product is safe or that illness is unconfirmed unless quality and legal have verified that wording.
To the account team
- One spokesperson and one approval chain; no junior staff contact with the blogger.
- Brief the team on the difference between declining to comment and making a false or misleading statement.
- Log all incoming complaints and media queries; route safety reports to the client's quality team immediately.
- Rehearse the response to 'Are you paying influencers?' Answer: 'No; we do not pay for coverage or deletion of criticism.'
3. What records would you preserve and why, and how would you document your advice?
Read the worked answer
Preserve the blogger's post and replies; all six complaints and timestamps; internal lab reports and chain-of-custody records; Facebook comments before and after moderation; the draft contract; emails and messages among client, agency and legal; customer-service call logs; and media queries. Also preserve the agency's recommendation and the client's decision.
Why: a food-illness claim can become litigation or a regulatory inquiry. Deleting posts or records after a dispute can be treated as spoliation and can damage credibility. A documented legal hold shows good faith and helps reconstruct what was known and when.
How: send a written hold notice to all custodians, suspend auto-deletion, instruct the team not to alter or delete records, and keep legal advice separate from business records. Create a decision log with dates, options considered, advice given and approvals. Do not put privileged legal advice in the public file.