I85PREP
⌘ K
APR study materials
APR study resources

Presumptive Pathogen Positive With Product Already in Stores

APR · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Presumptive Pathogen Positive With Product Already in Stores

A frozen-berry manufacturer sources fruit from three countries. On Tuesday morning, its internal lab reports a presumptive positive for a pathogen in one lot; confirmatory testing will take 24-48 hours. The lot has already shipped to two national retailers. A consumer post with a photo of the product and a claim of illness has 20,000 shares. A retailer's quality team demands written assurance within six hours. The state health department calls asking for any information. The CEO wants to wait for confirmation; legal says do not speculate; operations says the product is safe and the lab result is probably a false positive. The company has a recall plan but no holding statement, and social listening shows the brand name trending. You are the crisis lead.

1. What would you do in the first six hours, and why?

Read the worked answer

First six hours

  1. Convene the crisis team (CEO, quality, legal, operations, communications) and assign a single incident lead. Open a decision log.
  2. Verify: which lot, which retailers, how much product remains in consumers' hands, what the lab found, what the confirmatory test will cover, and whether any illness reports are credible. Do not declare the product safe while a presumptive positive is unresolved.
  3. Put the lot on hold and ask retailers to pause sale voluntarily. This is a precaution, not an admission; it buys time and reduces exposure.
  4. Issue a holding statement within 60-90 minutes, with a next-update time. Acknowledge the reports, state what is known and unknown, and give a consumer contact.
  5. Notify the retailer with facts and a timeline, not a blanket assurance. Tell the health department what is known and when results are expected.
  6. Set up social listening and a customer-response script; preserve samples, lab records and shipping data.

Waiting for confirmation protects the company from a false alarm but exposes it to a larger recall and credibility loss if the test is positive. The holding statement can be honest without speculating.

2. Draft a holding statement and explain the principles behind its wording.

Read the worked answer

Draft 'We are aware of a consumer report involving [product] from lot [X]. We are treating it seriously. Our quality team is conducting confirmatory testing after an initial laboratory result, and we have asked retailers to pause sales of that lot while we investigate. No illness has been confirmed, and we are not asking consumers to discard product at this time; anyone with concerns should contact us at [channel] or seek medical advice if they feel unwell. We will provide an update by [time].'

Principles

  • State known, unknown and next step; avoid 'safe' and 'no risk.'
  • Show empathy without admitting liability.
  • Give a specific update time and keep it.
  • Use one spokesperson and the same wording across channels.
  • Do not blame the supplier or the consumer.
  • Keep legal review focused on factual accuracy, not silence.

3. Set out a decision rule for a positive, negative or inconclusive confirmatory test, and explain how communications would change in each case.

Read the worked answer

Agree the rule before the confirmatory result:

  • If positive: immediate voluntary recall or withdrawal of the lot, public notice with lot codes and where sold, direct notice to retailers and the health department, traceback to the supplier, and a daily update. Communications lead with action, not explanation: 'We are recalling X because...' Offer refunds and a clear consumer hotline.
  • If negative: publish the result and explain the initial presumptive positive and the precautionary pause. Thank retailers and consumers; do not imply the original concern was fake. Review why the first test occurred and whether other lots need checking.
  • If inconclusive: extend the hold, say so, and set a new update time; do not lift the pause on reassurance alone.

The trigger, decision-maker, recall scope and approval chain should be written into the plan now. Document the decision and the evidence so the company can defend it to regulators, retailers and the public.