TExES STR 293 study materials
TExES STR 293 study resources

TExES STR 293 study plan

TExES STR 293 · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Reading Development: Foundational Skills

  • Sequence the phonological-awareness continuum from word level to phoneme level and label one instructional activity for each of the four levels.

  • Segment, count, and manipulate phonemes in 25 self-generated words, including 10 multisyllabic words, writing the correct phoneme count beside each.

  • Differentiate phonemic awareness from phonics in five written contrast statements that each name a distinct example task.

  • Sort a self-generated set of 40 words into six phonics categories (CVC, consonant digraph, consonant blend, silent-e, vowel team, r-controlled) and mark the irregular ones.

  • Explain in writing why systematic, explicit phonics instruction outperforms incidental approaches, citing at least three instructional design features.

Your checkpoint

A 40-word phonics sort deck with an answer key, plus a typed 5-statement phonemic-awareness-vs-phonics comparison, scored against your own rubric at 80% or higher on a 20-item self-quiz.

Week 2

Reading Development: Foundational Skills

  • Label the six syllable types and divide 30 multisyllabic words using syllable-division rules, showing each division step.

  • Break 20 words into morphemes (base word, prefix, suffix) and state how each morpheme changes meaning or part of speech.

  • Categorize 25 high-frequency words as decodable, temporarily irregular, or permanently irregular and select a teaching routine for each category.

  • Define fluency's three components (accuracy, rate, prosody) and draft a scoring rubric with observable descriptors at three performance levels.

  • Match each of the five developmental spelling stages to two sample misspellings you construct and one instructional implication per stage.

Your checkpoint

A one-page phonics and word-study scope-and-sequence chart (skills ordered K-3, six syllable types, morpheme examples) plus a completed three-level fluency rubric, both checked against a 15-item self-quiz at 85% or higher.

Week 3

Reading Pedagogy

  • Identify and describe the five essential components of reading instruction and explain how each is assessed and taught.

  • Write a scripted 45-minute lesson that applies gradual release (model, guided practice, independent application) with at least four embedded checks for understanding.

  • Design three differentiation moves for one lesson, each tied to a specific learner need (decoding gap, language background, advanced reader).

  • Outline a classroom routine that builds motivation and engagement, naming three research-supported practices and one way to measure each.

Your checkpoint

A complete 45-minute lesson plan with scripted modeling, four checks for understanding, and a differentiation table of at least three rows, self-evaluated with a 10-point checklist where all items must be marked yes.

Week 4

Reading Pedagogy & Reading Assessment and Instruction

  • Compare screening, diagnostic, and progress-monitoring assessments by purpose, timing, and the decision each one drives.

  • Administer or simulate a running record on a 100-word passage and compute accuracy rate, error rate, and self-correction ratio.

  • Analyze a 10-error oral reading sample and classify each error (graphophonemic, semantic, syntactic, self-corrected) with an instructional next step.

  • Interpret three sample score reports (percentile rank, stanine, standard score) and translate each into a plain-language instructional statement.

  • Group six hypothetical students into flexible instructional groups using assessment data and justify each placement in one sentence.

Your checkpoint

A completed assessment decision matrix (screening vs. diagnostic vs. progress monitoring) plus a written case analysis of six students with group placements; score 75% or higher on a full-length practice test, broken out by domain in a written error log.

Week 5

Reading Development: Comprehension

  • Distinguish three tiers of vocabulary words and select five Tier 2 words from a self-chosen read-aloud text with student-friendly definitions.

  • Write a 7-step explicit vocabulary routine (context, definition, examples, non-examples, practice, application) and apply it to two words.

  • Explain how background knowledge and academic language support comprehension, naming three pre-reading activities and the knowledge each builds.

  • Design a read-aloud plan for an informational text with three text-dependent questions sequenced from literal to inferential.

Your checkpoint

A vocabulary and read-aloud instructional packet containing five Tier 2 words with definitions, two fully scripted 7-step routines, and three sequenced text-dependent questions, checked against an 8-item quality checklist.

Week 6

Reading Development: Comprehension

  • Map five comprehension strategies (predicting, questioning, visualizing, summarizing, monitoring) to a before-during-after reading frame with one cue per strategy per phase.

  • Compare narrative and expository text structures and create a graphic organizer for each of the four expository structures (description, sequence, compare-contrast, cause-effect).

  • Write six inference prompts for a short passage: three literal, two inferential, one evaluative, and label the evidence a reader must use for each.

  • Evaluate two passages of differing complexity using three text-complexity dimensions (quantitative, qualitative, reader-task) and state one scaffolding move per gap.

  • Draft a summary of a 300-word passage in 25 words or fewer and identify the two summarization rules you applied.

Your checkpoint

A strategy-to-phase planning grid plus four expository graphic organizers and a 25-word summary with a written justification; score 80% or higher on a 25-question comprehension and vocabulary practice set.

Week 7

Reading Assessment and Instruction & Reading Pedagogy

  • Differentiate reliability from validity and construct three classroom examples of each, naming the threat demonstrated.

  • Design a multi-tier intervention plan for one struggling reader that specifies tier, intensity, duration, and a progress-monitoring schedule with a decision rule.

  • Graph eight weeks of fictional progress-monitoring data and state whether the student is responding, using an aimline and at least two data-based decision points.

  • Match six assessment instruments (informal reading inventory, curriculum-based measurement, phonics inventory, vocabulary probe, comprehension retell, spelling inventory) to the skill each measures and one limitation each has.

  • Explain how assessment data determines flexible grouping, intervention changes, and referral, in a three-paragraph written response.

Your checkpoint

A one-student intervention plan with a hand-drawn aimline graph across eight weeks and at least two written decision points, plus a six-row assessment-instrument comparison table scored against a 10-item rubric at 8/10 or better.

Week 8

Reading Pedagogy & Reading Development: Foundational Skills & Reading Development: Comprehension & Reading Assessment and Instruction

  • Complete two full-length timed practice tests under exam conditions and record score, pacing per question, and domain-level percent correct.

  • Consolidate every missed item into a single error log organized by domain, tagging each error as content gap, misread, or elimination error.

  • Re-teach the three weakest subskills identified in the error log by writing a one-page explanation and answering 10 new self-generated questions per subskill.

  • Explain aloud, without notes, one foundational-skill concept, one comprehension concept, and one assessment concept, each in under 90 seconds.

Your checkpoint

A complete error log covering all missed items from two practice tests with a re-teach summary for three subskills; score 85% or higher on the second full-length practice test and at least 80% within every domain.

Milestones

Week 2: Recite the six syllable types and divide 10 unseen multisyllabic words correctly (9/10) without notes; self-quiz on foundational skills at 85% or higher.

Week 4: Full-length practice test #1 completed and scored at 75% or higher, with domain-by-domain percentages recorded and every missed item logged.

Week 6: Comprehension and vocabulary practice set scored at 80% or higher; four expository graphic organizers completed and self-checked against all four text structures.

Week 8: Second full-length practice test scored at 85% or higher with no domain below 80%; error log closed out and three weak subskills re-taught with evidence of 10/10 on new self-generated questions.