Requisition Freeze Mid-Offer
Northwind Logistics has an approved requisition for a Senior Fleet Analyst (pay range $78,000-$92,000) in the Transportation org. The recruiter extended a verbal offer at $88,000 to a candidate who accepted verbally, and the offer letter is drafted but not signed. Two days before the planned signature, Finance announces a company-wide hiring freeze effective immediately, with an exception process requiring VP and CFO sign-off. The hiring manager says the role is 'business critical' because a retirement in six weeks will leave the team with no one who can run the fuel-cost model. The candidate has another offer expiring in five business days. HR business partner is asked to advise. The company has no written policy on verbal offers during freezes; precedent is inconsistent.
1. What should the HR business partner recommend regarding the verbal offer, and what is the reasoning?
Read the worked answer
The verbal offer created a commitment risk but not a binding contract in most US jurisdictions (no signed agreement, consideration, or start date fixed). Still, revoking without a path forward damages the employer brand and risks the candidate. Recommended sequence:
- Do not let the candidate sign until the exception is decided, to avoid an unauthorized commitment during a freeze.
- File the exception immediately with the documented business case: retirement in six weeks, sole owner of the fuel-cost model, quantified revenue/cost exposure. Business-critical justification must be evidence-based, not asserted.
- Communicate honestly with the candidate within 48 hours: confirm interest, explain an internal approval step, and ask for a short extension on their deadline. Silence is the worst option.
- Prepare a fallback: if the exception is denied, decide whether to offer a contract role or a delayed start with a written commitment, and get that approved before promising it.
The key judgment is separating the process obligation (freeze applies) from the relationship obligation (candidate was told yes). Handle both explicitly.
2. The CFO denies the exception but says 'find a way to cover the work.' What options should HR present, and what are the trade-offs?
Read the worked answer
HR should convert the denial into a scoped set of options rather than re-arguing:
- Internal backfill/temporary reassignment: identify who can run the fuel-cost model, and formalize a temporary assignment with a stipend or comp adjustment. Trade-off: may create internal equity questions and a gap elsewhere.
- Contractor/agency: covers the six-week gap and the model work without a headcount hire. Trade-off: knowledge transfer risk, higher hourly cost, and the freeze may also cover contingent labor - verify.
- Delayed start with written commitment: extend the signed offer to a start date after the freeze review, with a documented commitment. Trade-off: candidate may decline; commitment must be authorized in writing.
- Reopen the exception with new framing: if the CFO's statement implies the work is critical, ask them to document that in the exception file so the decision is consistent.
HR's role is to surface the trade-offs and force a documented decision, not to quietly circumvent the freeze.