The Patrol Log That Doesn't Match the Clock
You are a supervisor reviewing the patrol records for a small industrial estate. The night guard's log shows hourly patrols at 22:00, 23:00, 00:00, 01:00, 02:00, 03:00, 04:00 and 05:00, each marked 'all secure, no issues'. You notice that the checkpoint tag times recorded by the electronic tour system show only four reads, clustered at 22:05, 00:10, 02:05 and 04:10, and that the guard's handwritten times are all exactly on the hour. CCTV from the gate shows the guard's vehicle did not move between 01:00 and 04:30. When you ask him, he says 'the tags don't always scan, I did the rounds, it's fine'. There was a break-in at Unit 4 two nights ago, and the client is asking for the patrol records.
1. What are the concerns with the records, and why does it matter?
Read the worked answer
Concerns:
- The handwritten times are suspiciously exact and do not match the electronic tour reads.
- The tour system shows gaps of roughly two hours between reads, inconsistent with hourly patrols.
- CCTV indicates the vehicle was stationary for 3.5 hours, which contradicts 'hourly patrols'.
- The guard's explanation ('tags don't always scan') does not account for the pattern or the stationary vehicle. Why it matters: These are security records that may be relied on by the client, insurers and police after a break-in. If they are inaccurate or fabricated, that is a serious integrity and possibly disciplinary matter, and it may mislead an investigation. Records must be a true account, not a routine formality.
2. How should you handle the guard and the records now?
Read the worked answer
Be fair, factual and procedurally correct:
- Do not accuse him of lying outright; put the discrepancies to him neutrally and give him the chance to explain (e.g. tag faults, a different route).
- Check the tour system for known faults and ask him to demonstrate a scan.
- Do not alter or 'tidy' the original records. Preserve the handwritten log, the electronic tour data and the relevant CCTV, and note the chain of custody.
- Escalate to your line manager/HR per policy; this may be a disciplinary and integrity issue.
- Report accurately to the client: state what the records show and that the matter is under review, without speculating about the break-in.
3. What should the report to the client and the corrective action look like?
Read the worked answer
Report to client: factual and measured - summarise the patrol schedule, the tour-system reads, the CCTV observation and the action being taken. Do not claim the guard did or did not patrol beyond what the evidence shows; say what is verified and what is not. Corrective action:
- Re-brief all guards on the requirement for accurate, contemporaneous records and the consequences of falsification.
- Arrange repair/verification of the tour tags and add a supervisory spot-check.
- Consider random supervisor patrol checks and a review of the vehicle-tracking data.
- Keep the original records for the investigation and any insurance/police purposes. The aim is accurate records going forward and an honest account to the client, not a cover-up.