Group Versus Transient Displacement Across a Citywide Convention
A 300-room full-service hotel is evaluating a group request over a four-night citywide medical convention. Current transient forecast for those nights is 88% occupancy at a $245 ADR, with the hotel selling out on three of the four nights (the fourth is forecast at 74%). The group asks for 150 rooms per night for four nights - 600 room nights - at $165, plus $42,000 of F&B at a 32% departmental margin and $6,000 of meeting-room rental. The contract carries 10% attrition, and the hotel's history with this account suggests 5% additional wash beyond that. The director of sales wants to accept in order to "build the base."
1. Quantify the displacement, compute the breakeven rate, and decide: accept at $165, counter, or decline?
Read the worked answer
Displacement (rooms revenue foregone)
- Nights 1–3: the hotel sells out with or without the group, so all 150 rooms/night displace transient: 450 × $245 = $110,250.
- Night 4: 300 × 74% = 222 occupied, leaving 78 rooms. The group takes 150, so 72 displace transient: 72 × $245 = $17,640.
- Total displacement = $127,890.
Group value
- Contracted rooms: 600 × 90% (10% attrition) = 540 × $165 = $89,100
- F&B margin: $42,000 × 32% = $13,440
- Meeting-room rental: $6,000
- Total = $108,540
Net: −$19,350. Decline at $165.
Breakeven rate: ($127,890 − $19,440) ÷ 540 = $200.83.
Decision: counter at $205, or hold $200 with the F&B minimum guaranteed and attrition cut from 10% to 5% (worth 30 rooms × $165 = $4,950). Accepting at $165 buys occupancy the hotel does not need and gives away margin it cannot recover.
2. The DOS argues the group "fills need nights" and the F&B profit is "found money." Evaluate that reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Both phrases misread the deal.
"Found money" - the F&B margin and rental are already netted in the analysis ($19,440 of ancillary value against $127,890 of displaced rooms revenue). If the outlets would have run anyway, only the truly incremental covers count; treating the whole margin as incremental double-counts it.
"Fills need nights" - true only on night 4, and even there the group is bigger than the 78-room hole, so it still displaces 72 transient rooms. On the three sellout nights the group adds zero occupancy and takes 450 room nights from demand that would have paid $245.
The correct decision rule is contribution per displaced room night, not occupancy:
- Group value per occupied room night: $108,540 ÷ 540 = $201
- Displaced transient: $245
- Shortfall: about $44 (18%) per room night
The group is worth having at a rate that clears $200, and worth having at a smaller block on the soft night alone - but not as a base-builder at $165 on compression dates.
3. What non-rate terms would you negotiate, and what data would you verify before signing?
Read the worked answer
Non-rate terms
- Shrink the block to roughly 78 rooms/night so it fills the soft night with no displacement, or split the arrival pattern across the four nights.
- Attrition from 10% to 5%; add a cancellation schedule scaled to the compression dates.
- Replace the fixed $42,000 F&B with a per-attendee minimum plus a guaranteed banquet function.
- Ask for a two-year commitment with a rate review, so next year's compression dates are priced at market.
Data to verify
- Is night 4 genuinely soft, or a booking-curve artifact? Pull the three-year pickup curve for that week - a night at 74% ninety days out may be at 90% by arrival.
- If the city is sold out, the displaced transient rate may exceed $245. Re-run at $265: displacement rises to $138,330 and breakeven moves to about $220.
- This account's own wash history, not a portfolio average.
- Whether displaced transient can be re-accommodated at a sister property, which converts a lost booking into a relocation rather than a loss.