AICP study materials
AICP study resources

AICP study plan

AICP · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Fundamental Planning Knowledge

  • Sequence the major eras of US planning (City Beautiful, zoning and Euclid, urban renewal, Model Cities, growth management, New Urbanism) on a dated timeline with the key figure or case attached to each.

  • Explain the legal foundations of planning practice, including police power, state zoning enabling acts, due process and equal protection, and regulatory takings doctrine.

  • Distinguish the comprehensive plan from zoning, subdivision regulation, and capital improvement programming by listing what each does and does not control.

  • Solve practice problems using core demographic and economic methods such as cohort-survival projections, shift-share analysis, and economic base multipliers.

  • Map the intergovernmental framework - federal, state, regional, and local roles - for land use, transportation, housing, and environmental regulation.

Your checkpoint

A one-page dated legal-and-history timeline plus a 30-question self-quiz on Domain 2 scored at 80% or higher, with every missed item rewritten as a correct statement.

Week 2

Plan and Policy Development

  • Order the steps of the planning process and name the specific product produced at each step, from scoping through adoption and monitoring.

  • Draft a goal–objective–policy–implementation matrix for a hypothetical jurisdiction so that every goal has at least one measurable objective and one action.

  • Compare comprehensive, area, corridor, functional, and strategic plans, and select the right type for three different scenarios with written justification.

  • Evaluate how visioning, scenario planning, and alternative analysis shape the options that reach decision makers.

  • Identify the statutory adoption steps, including hearings, consistency requirements, and plan amendments.

Your checkpoint

A 3–4 page outline of a comprehensive plan for a fictional city of 40,000, containing a vision statement, five goals with measurable objectives, and an implementation action for each objective.

Week 3

Communication and Interaction

  • Match facilitation and outreach techniques - charrette, open house, focus group, Delphi, advisory committee, online engagement - to stated purposes, budgets, and audiences.

  • Write a plain-language executive summary of a technical planning memo at a readability level a general audience can follow.

  • Design a stakeholder power–interest matrix for a redevelopment scenario and derive a tailored contact strategy for each quadrant.

  • Practice active listening, framing, and conflict de-escalation by scripting responses to three hostile-public-comment scenarios.

  • Explain how visual communication tools (maps, renderings, dashboards, cross-sections) support or undermine public understanding.

Your checkpoint

A complete public engagement plan for one scenario - objectives, audiences, methods, schedule, accessibility provisions, and success metrics - accompanied by a 300-word plain-language summary of the proposal.

Week 4

Plan Implementation

  • Compare regulatory implementation tools - conventional zoning, form-based codes, overlay districts, planned unit developments, subdivision regulations - and select one for each of six stated development problems.

  • Trace a capital improvement program from plan goal to scored, scheduled, and funded project.

  • Explain the mechanics and appropriate use of fiscal impact analysis, tax increment financing, impact fees, exactions, and development agreements.

  • Diagnose common implementation failures (unfunded mandates, inconsistent codes, absent monitoring) and propose corrective measures.

  • Distinguish the roles of elected officials, appointed boards, and staff in adopting and administering implementation tools.

Your checkpoint

A two-page implementation toolkit memo matching eight plan recommendations to a specific regulatory tool, funding source, responsible agency, and performance measure.

Week 5

Areas of Practice & AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct

  • Build a comparison grid covering at least eight areas of practice - housing and community development, economic development, transportation, environmental and natural resources, urban design, historic preservation, health, and hazard mitigation - listing the characteristic tools, funding sources, and data sets of each.

  • Apply the AICP Code's aspirational principles and rules of practice to twelve ethics scenarios and name the specific provision implicated in each.

  • Describe the sequence an ethics complaint follows under the Code's enforcement provisions, from filing through review and appeal.

  • Recite the planner's obligations regarding honesty in applications and reports, conflicts of interest, confidential information, and public disclosure.

Your checkpoint

A twelve-entry ethics case notebook, each entry stating the scenario, the governing Code provision, and the correct course of action, plus an eight-subfield areas-of-practice grid.

Week 6

Research and Assessment Methods & Administration and Management

  • Select the appropriate analytic method - regression, shift-share, cohort-survival, location quotient, land suitability analysis, network analysis - for a stated policy question and justify the choice.

  • Critique a published planning study by identifying its sampling approach, sources of bias, and threats to internal and external validity.

  • Design a survey instrument and sampling plan for a neighborhood needs assessment, including mode, sample size logic, and nonresponse mitigation.

  • Compare line-item, program, performance, zero-based, and capital budgeting and outline the stages of the annual operating budget cycle.

  • Describe the personnel, procurement, records, and contracting responsibilities a planning office carries under administrative management.

Your checkpoint

A two-page research design memo for a downtown parking study specifying the research question, required data, method, sampling approach, and three acknowledged limitations.

Week 7

Leadership

  • Distinguish leadership from management and match leadership approaches to three workplace or political scenarios.

  • Construct an influence strategy for a controversial plan by identifying champions, likely opponents, coalition partners, and a framing narrative.

  • Apply interest-based negotiation to a simulated development agreement and document the trade-offs offered to each side.

  • Re-solve every question missed in weeks 1 through 6 and restate the underlying rule in your own words.

Your checkpoint

A one-page leadership and influence strategy for the Week 3 engagement scenario, plus a missed-question log covering weeks 1–6 with a corrected rationale for each entry.

Week 8

Fundamental Planning Knowledge & Plan and Policy Development & Communication and Interaction & Plan Implementation & Areas of Practice & AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct & Research and Assessment Methods & Administration and Management & Leadership

  • Complete two full-length timed practice examinations under test-day conditions and record scores by domain.

  • Rebuild flashcards for every domain scoring below 70% and drill them until recall is automatic.

  • Recite from memory the exam's domain weights and the three or four anchor frameworks for each domain.

  • Finalize test-day logistics, including appointment time, identification requirements, and a time-allocation strategy for flagged items.

Your checkpoint

A one-page highest-risk facts sheet listing the fifteen facts most often missed across all practice sets, each verified against a primary source such as the Code of Ethics or a statute.

Milestones

Week 2: Score 80% or higher on a 30-question Domain 2 quiz and produce a complete plan outline in which every one of the five goals has a measurable objective and a funded or assigned action.

Week 4: Score 70% or higher on a 60-question cumulative practice test covering Domains 2, 4, 3, and 5, and show a corrected rationale for every missed item.

Week 6: Score 75% or higher on a 100-question mixed practice examination spanning all nine domains, with per-domain scores recorded.

Week 8: Score 80% or higher on two full-length timed practice examinations and confirm that no single domain falls below 70%.