The Treaty of Sèvres and Its Aftermath
The Treaty of Sèvres (1920) was imposed on the Ottoman Empire after World War I. It recognized the independence of Armenia and allocated territory to the Armenian Republic, including parts of eastern Anatolia. However, the treaty was never ratified by the Ottoman parliament and was superseded by the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), which did not recognize an independent Armenia and restored much of the territory to Turkey. Armenian historians argue that Sèvres represented a missed opportunity for justice, while Turkish historians emphasize that Sèvres was imposed under duress and was unrealistic given the demographic and military realities. The Sovietization of Armenia in 1920 also altered the geopolitical context. Consider the perspectives of Armenian nationalists, Turkish nationalists, and the Allied powers.
1. Explain why the Treaty of Sèvres failed to establish a lasting Armenian state. Consider at least two political and one military factor.
Read the worked answer
Political factors: (1) The Ottoman government never ratified Sèvres, and the Turkish nationalist movement under Mustafa Kemal rejected it, forming a rival government in Ankara. (2) The Allied powers were divided and lacked the will to enforce the treaty; they were preoccupied with other post-war issues and gradually withdrew support for Armenia. Military factor: The Turkish nationalist forces defeated the Armenian army in the Turkish-Armenian War (1920) and recaptured territory. Additionally, the Soviet Red Army invaded Armenia in late 1920, leading to the Sovietization of the country and the end of the independent republic. Thus, Sèvres was never implemented due to lack of enforcement, Turkish military resistance, and the Soviet takeover.
2. Compare the Armenian and Turkish nationalist narratives regarding the Treaty of Sèvres. How does each side justify its position? Which historical evidence supports or challenges each narrative?
Read the worked answer
Armenian nationalist narrative: Sèvres was a just recognition of Armenian claims based on historical presence and the Armenian Genocide; its failure was due to great power betrayal and Turkish aggression. Evidence: The treaty did include an Armenian state; the genocide and ethnic cleansing had reduced Armenian population in the region. Turkish nationalist narrative: Sèvres was an imperialist imposition that ignored Turkish majority in eastern Anatolia and was never accepted by the Turkish people; Lausanne corrected this injustice. Evidence: Demographic data showed Turks were a majority in many areas; the Turkish War of Independence demonstrated popular resistance. Both narratives contain elements of truth: Sèvres was indeed imposed without Ottoman consent, but it also reflected Armenian historical claims. The Lausanne Treaty recognized Turkish sovereignty but left Armenian claims unresolved, leading to lasting grievances.