Language Policy in a Bilingual School
A high school in Gyumri has a student body that is 70% Armenian-speaking and 30% Russian-speaking at home. The school follows the national curriculum, which mandates Armenian as the primary language of instruction. However, many Russian-speaking students struggle academically because they are not fully proficient in Armenian. The school administration proposes a dual-language program where core subjects (math, science) are taught in both Armenian and Russian, with the goal of gradually transitioning to Armenian-only by grade 12. Parents of Armenian-speaking students worry that the dual-language approach will slow down their children's progress. Teachers are concerned about the increased workload and lack of materials in Russian. The school must decide whether to implement the dual-language program or maintain the current system with additional Armenian language support for Russian-speaking students.
1. Identify the main linguistic and educational challenges in this situation. How does the proposed dual-language program address or exacerbate these challenges?
Read the worked answer
Linguistic challenges: Russian-speaking students have limited Armenian proficiency, hindering comprehension in Armenian-only classes. Armenian-speaking students may not be exposed to Russian, but that is not a stated problem. Educational challenges: Academic achievement gap between the two groups; potential for segregation or inequality. The dual-language program addresses the challenge by providing instruction in students' home language for core subjects, aiding comprehension and allowing gradual transition. However, it may exacerbate challenges by: (1) requiring teachers to be bilingual and skilled in dual-language pedagogy, which may be lacking; (2) increasing workload and need for Russian materials; (3) potentially slowing Armenian-speaking students if instruction is repeated in two languages or if pace is adjusted. Additionally, parents' concerns about slowing progress may lead to resistance.
2. Evaluate the alternative: maintaining Armenian-only instruction with additional Armenian language support. What are its potential benefits and drawbacks? Which approach would you recommend and why?
Read the worked answer
Benefits of Armenian-only with support: (1) Aligns with national curriculum and language policy; (2) avoids the complexity of dual-language instruction; (3) may accelerate Armenian acquisition for Russian speakers through intensive support. Drawbacks: (1) Russian-speaking students may fall behind in content areas while learning Armenian; (2) support may be insufficient if not well-designed; (3) may lead to stigmatization or segregation if pull-out programs are used. Recommendation: A phased approach combining elements of both. Start with targeted Armenian language support for Russian speakers, while gradually introducing some subjects in Russian for those who need it, with a clear transition plan. This balances the need for immediate comprehension with the goal of Armenian proficiency, and addresses parental concerns by ensuring Armenian-speaking students are not held back. Additionally, invest in teacher training and bilingual materials. This approach is more feasible than full dual-language and more supportive than Armenian-only.