API 936 study materials
API 936 study resources

API 936 study plan

API 936 · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Refractory Materials, Properties, and Selection

  • Classify refractory classes (fireclay, high-alumina, basic, silica, alumina-silica, insulating) by chemistry and bond type, and state the service limits of each.

  • Build a property matrix comparing density, cold crushing strength, modulus of rupture, PLC, thermal conductivity, and abrasion resistance across at least 8 material types.

  • Explain the four damage mechanisms (thermal shock, chemical attack/slag corrosion, erosion, mechanical/structural) and match each to a plausible failure signature.

  • Solve 5 numeric problems covering thermal expansion, heat loss through a two-layer wall, and anchor/stud thermal load.

Your checkpoint

One-page material property matrix (8 materials x 6 properties) plus 5 written failure-mode diagnoses citing the governing mechanism.

Week 2

Refractory Materials, Properties, and Selection & Refractory Design and Specification

  • Select candidate lining materials for 4 different service environments (rotary kiln burning zone, FCC regenerator, steel ladle, reformer) and justify each choice against temperature, atmosphere, and slag chemistry.

  • Map common refractory test methods to the property they quantify and the units reported, without looking at notes.

  • Convert a set of service conditions into 10 quantitative specification clauses (thickness, density, strength, chemistry limits).

  • Identify where material selection interacts with design: anchor alloy grade, expansion joint allowance, and backup insulation.

Your checkpoint

Material selection justification sheet for 4 units, each with 3 candidate materials ranked and 10 derived spec clauses.

Week 3

Refractory Design and Specification

  • Draft the installation-related sections of a lining specification covering surface prep, anchor spacing and pattern, expansion joints, and cure/dryout requirements.

  • Calculate lining thickness, anchor length and spacing, and expansion joint width for two vessel geometries.

  • Audit a sample specification and list at least 8 missing or ambiguous requirements.

  • Build a QC hold-point and witness-point list tied to design requirements.

Your checkpoint

Complete 3-page lining specification for one vessel plus a documented gap audit listing 8+ deficiencies found in the sample spec.

Week 4

Installation, Mixing, and Curing Practices

  • Determine correct mixing water quantity, mixing sequence, and mix time for castables and ramming mixes, and state the consequences of over- and under-watering.

  • Compare placement methods (vibration casting, gunning, shotcrete, hand ramming) and select the right one for 5 given geometries.

  • Write a curing schedule that respects ambient and substrate temperature limits and addresses rapid moisture loss.

  • Sequence the installation steps for a vessel from anchor welding through final cure, including inspection points.

Your checkpoint

Two complete mixing-and-curing procedures (one castable, one plastic/ramming mix) with numeric acceptance criteria and a step-by-step install sequence.

Week 5

Inspection, Testing, and Quality Control

  • Describe sampling, specimen preparation, and curing of test pieces for castables, and list errors that invalidate results.

  • Interpret test results against acceptance criteria for density, CCS, MOR, PLC, and moisture content, and decide accept/reject/re-test.

  • Build an inspection and test plan with at least 10 hold points spanning incoming material, installation, and post-cure checks.

  • Outline the nonconformance process from detection through disposition and documentation.

Your checkpoint

Inspection and test plan (ITP) with 10+ hold points, acceptance criteria columns, and 4 worked accept/reject decisions.

Week 6

Dryout, Repair, and Maintenance of Refractory Linings

  • Design a dryout heat-up curve (hold points, ramp rates, soak times) for a thick castable lining and justify each segment against steam migration and spalling risk.

  • Diagnose 5 lining failure case descriptions and prescribe a repair method (patch, hot repair, partial reline, full reline).

  • Plan a turnaround: scope definition, access, demolition, inspection of shell and anchors, and reinstallation sequence.

  • State the safety and quality checks required before returning a unit to service.

Your checkpoint

Dryout schedule with thermocouple placement plan and ramp/hold table, plus 5 failure diagnoses with recommended repairs.

Week 7

Refractory Materials, Properties, and Selection & Refractory Design and Specification & Installation, Mixing, and Curing Practices & Inspection, Testing, and Quality Control & Dryout, Repair, and Maintenance of Refractory Linings

  • Re-test the two weakest domains identified by prior quiz scores and log each miss with its root cause.

  • Work 6 integrated case scenarios that each span selection, design, installation, and inspection.

  • Reduce the error log by re-deriving every missed concept from first principles rather than memorizing answers.

  • Time-box practice sets to exam pace to build stamina.

Your checkpoint

Categorized error log of 30+ missed items with root cause and corrective note, plus re-test scores for both weak domains.

Week 8

Refractory Materials, Properties, and Selection & Refractory Design and Specification & Installation, Mixing, and Curing Practices & Inspection, Testing, and Quality Control & Dryout, Repair, and Maintenance of Refractory Linings

  • Complete two full-length timed practice exams under exam conditions.

  • Review every miss and re-verify the underlying fact in reference material before moving on.

  • Recite the key numbers (cure temperatures, ramp rates, water ratios, test tolerances) from memory.

  • Finalize a one-page summary sheet for last-minute review.

Your checkpoint

Two timed practice exams scored at 85% or higher with a completed review log and a one-page final summary sheet.

Milestones

Week 2: Score 75% or higher on a self-written 30-question quiz covering Domains 1 and 2; material property matrix completed from memory.

Week 4: Score 70% or higher on a 40-question mixed mock covering Domains 1-3; both mixing/curing procedures validated against reference criteria.

Week 6: All five domains covered once; score 75% or higher on Domain 4 and Domain 5 quizzes; dryout schedule reviewed for internal consistency of ramp rates and hold times.

Week 8: Two timed full-length practice exams at 85% or higher; error log shows no repeated root cause across the final two attempts.