Orthognathic Surgery in a Patient with Cleft Lip and Palate
A 22-year-old woman with a repaired left unilateral cleft lip and palate presents with a concave facial profile, midface hypoplasia, and a Class III malocclusion. She has a negative overjet of 5 mm and anterior crossbite. She reports difficulty chewing and speaking, and is concerned about her appearance. She has a history of multiple cleft surgeries as a child, including lip repair at 3 months and palate repair at 12 months. She has no other medical conditions. Cephalometric analysis shows a SNA of 76°, SNB of 84°, and ANB of -8°. Her maxillary incisors are retroclined, and mandibular incisors are proclined. She has a residual oronasal fistula and scarring of the upper lip.
1. What are the treatment options for her skeletal discrepancy, and what factors influence your choice?
Read the worked answer
Treatment options:
- Maxillary advancement (Le Fort I osteotomy) – corrects midface hypoplasia. May need bone grafting due to scarring and reduced vascularity from prior cleft surgery.
- Mandibular setback – alone would worsen the midface deficiency, so not ideal.
- Bimaxillary surgery – maxillary advancement and mandibular setback to correct the discrepancy and improve facial harmony.
- Distraction osteogenesis – for severe maxillary hypoplasia, especially if advancement >10 mm or if soft tissue resistance is high.
- Camouflage orthodontics – not suitable for skeletal discrepancy of this magnitude.
Factors influencing choice:
- Severity of discrepancy: ANB -8° indicates significant skeletal Class III; surgery is warranted.
- Soft tissue profile: Need to address midface deficiency and lip scarring.
- Scarring and vascularity: Prior cleft surgery may compromise blood supply; consider distraction or staging.
- Oronasal fistula: Repair before or during surgery to prevent complications.
- Patient’s expectations and compliance: Orthodontic preparation and postoperative orthodontics required.
- Speech: Surgery may affect velopharyngeal function; assess preoperatively.
2. What are the potential complications of Le Fort I osteotomy in this patient, and how would you mitigate them?
Read the worked answer
Potential complications:
- Vascular compromise: Scarring from cleft surgery reduces blood supply; risk of necrosis. Mitigation: preserve descending palatine artery, use distraction osteogenesis if advancement >10 mm, or stage surgery.
- Relapse: Cleft patients have a higher relapse rate due to scar tissue. Mitigation: overcorrection, rigid fixation, and possible bone grafting.
- Oronasal fistula: May persist or enlarge. Mitigation: repair fistula at time of surgery with local flaps.
- Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI): Maxillary advancement can worsen VPI. Mitigation: preoperative speech assessment; consider pharyngoplasty if needed.
- Infection and hardware failure: Mitigation: aseptic technique, antibiotics, and stable fixation.
- Nerve injury: Infraorbital nerve paresthesia. Mitigation: careful dissection.
- Malocclusion: Mitigation: precise preoperative orthodontic planning and surgical splint.
Multidisciplinary approach: Involve speech therapist, orthodontist, and prosthodontist as needed.