The Suburb With No Field
A local council reviews physical activity in a low-income suburb of 9000 people. Only 21% of adults meet the national physical activity guidelines, compared with 48% in a nearby higher-income suburb. The suburb has one small oval that is booked by a private cricket club on weekends, no footpaths on the main road, and a bus service that stops at 6 pm. The nearest gym is 7 km away. A survey finds that residents value physical activity but cite cost, safety on the main road and lack of time after work as barriers. The council has a limited budget and must choose between subsidising gym memberships, building a shared walking and cycling path, or funding free evening sport at the oval.
1. Evaluate the three options using a social-ecological approach to physical activity participation.
Read the worked answer
The three options act at different levels. Subsidising gym memberships targets individual cost barriers, but the gym is 7 km away and the bus stops at 6 pm, so access remains a strong barrier. It may help a motivated minority but is unlikely to shift population rates.
Building a shared walking and cycling path changes the physical environment. It addresses safety on the main road and provides an activity option that does not require travel, membership or a scheduled session. Because it supports incidental activity such as walking to the bus or shops, it can reach residents who are not interested in organised sport. This is the option most consistent with an ecological approach, because it changes the setting in which behaviour occurs rather than relying on individual motivation.
Free evening sport at the oval addresses cost and social support, but the oval is booked by the private club on weekends and evening access may be limited. It is valuable for those who want organised sport but has a narrower reach. The path is likely to have the broadest and most sustained effect for the budget.
2. The council also wants to address the time barrier. Explain how the chosen option could be combined with one other change to reduce time pressure, and identify one equity consideration.
Read the worked answer
The time barrier is partly about the gap between finishing work and the last bus at 6 pm. If the walking and cycling path connects residential streets to the bus stop and shops, residents can combine commuting with activity instead of setting aside a separate session. A second change could be extending bus hours or rerouting the service to pass the path and the oval, which reduces dependence on car travel and makes evening activity feasible for residents without cars.
An equity consideration is that a new path can raise nearby property values and rents, potentially displacing the low-income residents it is meant to help, a process sometimes called green gentrification. The council should pair the path with secure tenancy protections or affordable housing measures. It should also consult residents, including those with disabilities and older adults, so the path design meets actual needs rather than assumed ones.