Research Project Sources Under Scrutiny
For a school-assessed research project, a student, Daniel, submits a 1,500-character report on changing family structures in urban China. His bibliography lists six sources: two are Chinese news articles, one is a government statistical yearbook, one is a blog post with no author or date, one is a Wikipedia page, and one is a personal interview with his aunt, who lives in Shanghai. In the report, three statistics are presented without citation, and one paragraph closely follows the wording of a news article without quotation marks. Daniel says he "put it in his own words" but the sentence structure is nearly identical. The teacher must decide how to address the sourcing and the unattributed paragraph.
1. Evaluate the reliability of Daniel's six sources and explain what guidance the teacher should give about source selection.
Read the worked answer
The sources vary considerably in reliability. The government statistical yearbook is the strongest: it is official, dated and methodologically documented. The two Chinese news articles are usable but should be treated as secondary reporting, ideally cross-checked against primary data. The personal interview is valuable as a primary perspective but is a single anecdote and cannot support general claims about urban China; it should be presented as one family's experience.
The blog post with no author or date and the Wikipedia page are weak sources for a formal research task. Wikipedia can be a starting point for finding primary sources, but should not be cited as authority. The undated blog cannot be verified.
The teacher should explain the difference between primary and secondary sources, the importance of authorship and date, and the need to cross-check statistics against official data. The guidance should be practical: replace the blog and Wikipedia with citable sources, attribute the interview clearly as a single case, and cite the yearbook directly for the statistics. The three uncited statistics should be traced to their sources or removed.
2. How should the teacher handle the paragraph that closely follows a news article without quotation marks, and what distinction should be drawn?
Read the worked answer
The teacher should first establish the facts: compare Daniel's paragraph with the news article side by side, and identify exactly which phrasing is near-identical. The key distinction is between poor paraphrasing and plagiarism. Close sentence structure with substituted words is not adequate paraphrasing, even if Daniel believed he had "put it in his own words." Intent matters for how the matter is handled, but not for whether the work meets academic standards.
The teacher should explain the difference between quoting (with quotation marks and a citation), paraphrasing (genuinely restating the idea in his own structure, with a citation), and copying (unattributed use of another's wording). Daniel should be given the opportunity to explain, and the school's academic integrity policy should be followed.
The teacher should then apply the school's procedure consistently, which may involve requiring the paragraph to be rewritten with proper citation, or a penalty under policy. The response should be recorded, and Daniel should receive explicit instruction on citation and paraphrasing so the issue is not repeated.