SACE Stage 2 Chinese (continuers) flashcards
SACE Stage 2 Chinese (continuers) · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Folio weighting
- The Folio is a school assessment component worth 30% of the final SACE Stage 2 Chinese (Continuers) subject grade, comprising three to five tasks.
- In-depth Study weighting
- The In-depth Study is a school assessment component worth 40% of the final subject grade; students research a topic within a prescribed theme and present a response.
- School assessment total
- School assessment contributes 70% of the final subject grade, combining the Folio at 30% and the In-depth Study at 40%.
- Interactive task requirement
- At least one Folio task must be interactive - a spoken or written exchange in Chinese with another person - assessing communication and interaction skills.
- Text-production task
- At least one Folio task must require students to produce an original text in Chinese for a specified audience, purpose, and text type.
- Three strands
- The subject assesses communicating, understanding texts, and understanding language; each assessment task should address at least two of these strands.
- In-depth Study sources
- The In-depth Study must be supported by at least three sources, which are listed and submitted with the response as evidence of research.
- In-depth Study reflection
- Students reflect on their research process in English, explaining decisions, challenges, and what they learned about the topic and about researching in Chinese.
- Performance standards A–E
- Five grade descriptors (A to E) describe quality of achievement across the three strands; the final school grade is judged holistically from all evidence.
- Text types in Folio
- Folio tasks may use text types such as recount, report, article, blog, email, letter, conversation script, or oral presentation, chosen to suit purpose and audience.
- Assessment plan
- The school's assessment plan documents task types, weightings, conditions, and text-length guidance so that assessment is consistent and comparable across students.
- Prescribed themes
- Stage 2 Chinese (Continuers) organises content around themes including the individual, the Chinese-speaking communities, and the changing world.
- Holistic grading
- Grades are not calculated by averaging task percentages; teachers match the overall body of evidence to the performance standards descriptors.
- Supervised conditions
- Some school assessment tasks, such as the In-depth Study response, may be completed under supervision as specified in the school's assessment plan.
- External assessment total
- The external assessment is worth 30% of the subject grade and consists of an oral examination and a written examination set by the SACE Board.
- Oral examination weighting
- The oral examination is worth 20% of the subject grade and includes a conversation and a discussion based on the student's In-depth Study.
- Written examination weighting
- The written examination is worth 10% of the subject grade and is completed under supervised conditions, assessing comprehension and written production in Chinese.
- Oral conversation length
- The conversation section of the oral examination lasts about five minutes and draws on the prescribed themes and topics studied during Stage 2.
- In-depth Study discussion
- The oral discussion lasts about five minutes and requires students to explain, justify, and reflect on the findings of their In-depth Study in Chinese.
- Oral criteria
- Oral performance is judged on communication and interaction, content and relevance, range and accuracy of language, and pronunciation and fluency.
- Written response length
- The written examination typically requires production of a text in Chinese of about 250 to 300 characters or equivalent, for a specified audience and purpose.
- Responding to texts
- Written examination tasks require students to identify information, ideas, and opinions in Chinese texts and respond in English or Chinese as instructed.
- Assessment design criteria
- The three criteria - communicating, understanding texts, and understanding language - are used with grade descriptors A to E to judge student performance.
- Communicating criterion
- This criterion covers producing coherent Chinese texts and interacting appropriately, with accuracy and range suited to audience, purpose, and context.
- Understanding texts criterion
- This criterion covers comprehending information, ideas, and opinions in spoken and written Chinese texts, including implied meaning and tone.
- Understanding language criterion
- This criterion covers knowledge of Chinese vocabulary, grammar, and text structure, and the ability to use this knowledge to interpret and create meaning.
- Oral examination structure
- The oral examination has two parts: a conversation with the examiner and a discussion of the student's In-depth Study, each lasting about five minutes.
- Written examination structure
- The written examination includes sections responding to texts and producing a Chinese text; it is completed under supervised examination conditions.
- External examination timing
- The written examination is scheduled in the SACE external examination period, and the oral examination is conducted at a time set by the SACE Board.
- In-depth Study in oral
- The In-depth Study topic chosen for school assessment also forms the basis of the oral examination discussion, so the topic must allow depth and reflection.
- Range and accuracy
- Range refers to variety of vocabulary and sentence structures; accuracy refers to control of grammar, characters, and pronunciation in communication.
- Grade descriptors A–E
- Descriptors A to E describe increasing quality of achievement against each assessment design criterion, from excellent to limited evidence of learning.