BTEB Refrigeration & AC Exam study materials
BTEB Refrigeration & AC Exam study resources

Walk-in Freezer Pull-Down After Compressor Replacement

BTEB Refrigeration & AC Exam · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Walk-in Freezer Pull-Down After Compressor Replacement

A 6 m x 4 m x 2.7 m walk-in freezer (product storage, -18 C design) has just received a replacement semi-hermetic compressor of the same nominal capacity as the failed unit. The technician charges R-404A by weight to the nameplate value plus 5 percent, then starts the system. After 90 minutes the box is at -6 C and falling very slowly. Suction pressure is 1.6 bar gauge, discharge 14 bar gauge, suction line is frosted back to the compressor body, and the sight glass shows a clear liquid line. Ambient in the machine room is 38 C. The condenser is air-cooled, fan running, coil visibly dusty. The evaporator fans run and the coil is evenly frosted. The nameplate states a 12 K evaporator TD and 8 K condenser approach at 32 C ambient.

1. Diagnose why pull-down is slow and rank the three most probable causes with the evidence that supports or weakens each.

Read the worked answer

Ranked causes:

  1. High condensing pressure from a dirty condenser plus 38 C ambient. Discharge at 14 bar gauge for R-404A corresponds to roughly 45-47 C saturation, giving a condensing approach far above the 8 K nameplate value at 32 C. At 38 C ambient the approach is still excessive, and the dusty coil explains it. High condensing pressure cuts mass flow and capacity directly, which fits a slow but steady pull-down with an otherwise healthy frosted evaporator.

  2. Overcharge from the +5 percent weighting. The sight glass being clear does not prove correct charge; a clear glass only shows no bubbles at that moment. Excess charge raises condensing pressure and floods the evaporator, which is consistent with frost reaching the compressor body. This is a contributing, not primary, fault because the dirty condenser alone explains most of the pressure rise.

  3. Evaporator TD analysis. Box at -6 C with an evaporator near -30 C saturation (about 1.6 bar gauge for R-404A) gives a TD far above the 12 K design, meaning the coil is starved of airflow or the load is high, not that the coil is underfed. Even frosting and running fans weaken a starving diagnosis.

Weakened: compressor capacity mismatch is unlikely since nominal capacity matches; an internal restriction is unlikely with a clear sight glass and even frost pattern.

Action: clean the condenser, re-check discharge at a corrected ambient, then recover and weigh in the charge to nameplate rather than trusting the +5 percent rule.

2. The technician proposes adding more refrigerant because suction pressure 'looks low'. Evaluate this proposal and state what measurements you would take before touching the charge.

Read the worked answer

Adding refrigerant is the wrong move and risks liquid slugging. Suction pressure is only meaningful against box temperature and evaporator TD. With the box at -6 C and the coil at roughly -30 C saturation, the coil is already running a very large TD; more charge would raise suction pressure slightly but mostly push liquid through to the compressor, which is already showing frost at the body.

Before changing charge, measure and record:

  • Superheat at the evaporator outlet and total superheat at the compressor suction service valve (target roughly 5-8 K at the evaporator, higher at the compressor).
  • Subcooling at the condenser outlet (target 4-8 K for this system).
  • Discharge pressure and the corresponding condensing temperature versus ambient, to quantify condenser approach.
  • Compressor running current versus nameplate RLA.
  • Air-on and air-off temperatures at both condenser and evaporator coils.

If subcooling is high and superheat at the compressor is near zero while the condenser approach is normal after cleaning, then excess charge is confirmed and refrigerant should be recovered, not added. If superheat is genuinely high with normal subcooling, look for a restriction or a starving TEV before adjusting charge.

3. State the acceptance criteria you would use to declare the pull-down complete and the system correctly commissioned.

Read the worked answer

Acceptance criteria, all measured after the condenser is cleaned and the charge is corrected to nameplate by weight:

  • Box temperature: reaches -18 C and holds through at least one defrost and re-pull-down cycle with product-load simulation or an empty-box stabilization period agreed with the client.
  • Evaporator TD: air-on minus evaporator saturation temperature close to the 12 K design value at steady state.
  • Condenser approach: condensing temperature minus ambient within about 8 K at the corrected ambient, confirming the coil is clean and airflow is adequate.
  • Superheat and subcooling: evaporator superheat in the 5-8 K band, subcooling 4-8 K, no frost on the compressor body, sight glass clear.
  • Electrical: running current at or below nameplate RLA, all three phases balanced within 10 percent on a three-phase unit.
  • Controls and safety: high-pressure cutout, low-pressure cutout, defrost termination and fan delay all function on test; door heaters and anti-sweat controls verified.
  • Documentation: charge weight, pressures, temperatures and current logged on the commissioning sheet with ambient recorded.