The Constable Who Took Money at a Checkpoint
During a highway checkpoint, Constable Karim stops a truck loaded with sand. The driver offers BDT 500 to avoid a weight and fitness check. A passer-by films the exchange on a phone and posts a 40-second clip that evening; it shows Karim putting notes into his shirt pocket. The next morning the clip has been shared widely, and a journalist calls the thana. Karim tells you the money was a fine receipted later, but the receipt book shows no entry for that day and the amount collected does not match any receipt. He has 11 years of service, a clean record, and a pending promotion. The officer-in-charge is on leave for three days.
1. As the senior officer present, set out the immediate steps you would take, distinguishing what you may do yourself and what must wait for higher authority.
Read the worked answer
What you may do now:
- Preserve evidence. Secure the video clip through a lawful request to the platform or the person who filmed it, and record the URL, time, and hash or screenshot. Note the identity of the journalist and what was asked.
- Record the allegation. Enter the complaint in the station diary and open a preliminary fact-finding note; do not label it a formal departmental case unless the rules assign that power to a higher officer.
- Separate the officer from the post. Temporarily reassign Karim away from cash-handling and checkpoint duty, in writing, without treating it as punishment. This protects the inquiry and him.
- Check the receipt book and cash book for the day, and take signed statements from the other officers at the checkpoint about who collected what.
- Inform the officer-in-charge by the fastest means and record that you did so; also inform the next higher authority if the matter is serious enough to attract media and public interest.
What must wait or go higher: A formal departmental proceeding, suspension, or any finding of guilt is for the appointing or disciplinary authority under the service rules, not for a sergeant or a stand-in. You gather facts and recommend; you do not adjudicate.
2. Karim asks you to 'hold the matter' until the officer-in-charge returns. How do you respond, and what are the risks of delay?
Read the worked answer
Response. Explain that you cannot hold it: the allegation is already public, the evidence is on the internet, and a delay will look like a cover-up. Tell him the matter will be recorded now, that he will be given a chance to state his case in writing, and that the inquiry will be fair. Advise him to put his version in writing immediately, including the receipt-book explanation, and to name any witness. Do not promise an outcome.
Risks of delay:
- Loss of evidence. Digital clips get deleted; witnesses at a roadside checkpoint disperse; the cash book can be altered.
- Compounding the charge. Failure to act on a known allegation can itself be misconduct for the supervising officer, and can convert a single bribery allegation into a charge of suppressing it.
- Public and media escalation. A three-day silence invites the inference that the force protects its own, damaging institutional credibility.
- Unfairness to Karim. Delay lets rumour harden into assumed guilt before he has given his account.
The correct balance is speed with fairness: record now, investigate promptly, hear him fully, and let the disciplinary authority decide.
3. The clip is 40 seconds long and does not show the start of the conversation. What weight should the inquiry give it, and what else must be established?
Read the worked answer
Weight. A short clip is relevant but not conclusive. It shows an act that looks like receiving money; it does not by itself prove the money was a bribe rather than, say, a receipted fine, a return of change, or an unrelated transaction. Its evidentiary value depends on authentication (who filmed it, when, where, whether it is complete and unedited) and on corroboration.
What must be established:
- Identity and context - that the officer is Karim, the location is the checkpoint, and the date and time are as alleged.
- The money - amount, denominations, source, and what happened to it afterwards; compare with the cash book and receipt book.
- The driver's account - a statement from the driver, taken without pressure, on whether he offered money and why.
- Witnesses - other officers at the checkpoint and any independent bystanders.
- Pattern - whether earlier receipts or complaints suggest a practice.
- Karim's explanation - tested against the receipt book, which currently does not support it.
A finding should rest on the totality, not on a viral clip alone; equally, the absence of a longer video does not make the allegation disappear.