The Grant That Came With Strings
Yoana runs a 3-year-old Sofia software studio with 6 employees. She has been offered a BGN 180,000 grant from a state programme that covers 70% of eligible costs, with the remaining 30% paid by the company. The eligible costs are a new hire's salary for 24 months and a BGN 40,000 equipment purchase. Yoana must pay all costs upfront and is reimbursed 60 days after each quarterly report. Her current cash balance is BGN 55,000. The company is profitable but its monthly operating surplus is only about BGN 4,000. The grant contract also requires the new position to be kept for 12 months after the funded period and forbids redundancies in the same role for 2 years. A private client has just offered a BGN 90,000 project that would require the same cash and the same new hire, but pays 40% upfront and the rest on delivery in 8 months.
1. Assess whether Yoana can realistically finance the grant, and identify the cash-flow gap she faces.
Read the worked answer
Start by turning the percentages into cash. If BGN 180,000 is 70% of eligible costs, total eligible costs are about BGN 257,000, so Yoana's own contribution is roughly BGN 77,000. But the timing matters more than the total. She must pay the new hire and equipment before reimbursement, and reimbursement arrives 60 days after each quarterly report, so she may wait up to five months for each tranche. With BGN 55,000 in the bank and a BGN 4,000 monthly surplus, her own 30% share alone consumes more than a year of surplus. The equipment purchase of BGN 40,000 is likely to be paid in one lump early, which alone nearly matches her cash balance. Her realistic cash gap is therefore the upfront outlay minus the BGN 55,000 buffer, financed only slowly by the monthly surplus. The conclusion is that she cannot self-finance the grant without a credit line, a partner contribution, or a renegotiated payment schedule. She should also check whether the programme allows advance payments or bank guarantees, which are common in Bulgarian grant schemes.
2. Compare the grant with the private client offer on financial and strategic grounds, and recommend a course of action.
Read the worked answer
The private project is BGN 90,000 with 40% (BGN 36,000) paid upfront, which improves rather than drains cash. The grant is larger in headline value but is a reimbursement model that consumes cash for months and imposes a 12-month retention obligation plus a 2-year no-redundancy clause on the role. That clause converts a flexible cost into a fixed liability and could block future restructuring. Strategically, the grant buys credibility with public bodies and may fund equipment Yoana needs anyway, while the private project builds a commercial reference and pays faster. A sound recommendation is not simply to pick the bigger number. She should test whether the two can coexist: the same hire and equipment may satisfy both, but only if the grant rules permit the role to work on commercial projects and if the private client's BGN 36,000 upfront covers the grant's early outlay. If not, she should take the private project, or seek a short-term bank facility to bridge the grant and only sign once financing is confirmed. The decision rule is: never sign a reimbursement grant whose upfront cost exceeds available cash plus committed credit.