Civil Authority, a Burned-Out Supplier, and Extra Expense
Harbor Home Furnishings sells furniture from a store in a strip center. Its Business Income and Extra Expense Coverage Form carries a $500,000 limit, a 72-hour waiting period, and the standard built-in coverage for dependent properties. Three things happen in one quarter. First, a fire destroys the restaurant two doors away, about 200 feet from the store; the fire marshal closes Harbor's only access road for six days while the neighboring structure is made safe, and the insured loses about $90,000 in sales. Second, the manufacturer that supplies 40% of Harbor's upholstery line suffers a plant fire and cannot ship for ten weeks; Harbor loses $150,000 in sales it could not fill from other vendors. Third, during the six-day closure Harbor spent $12,000 on a shuttle van, a pop-up tent sale and temporary storage. A separate three-day street festival later in the quarter, with no property damage anywhere, reduced sales by $20,000.
1. Analyze the six-day road closure and the three-day festival closure under the civil authority extension.
Read the worked answer
The six-day closure is covered, subject to the waiting period and the extension's time limit; the festival closure is not.
The civil authority extension requires: (1) damage to property other than the insured's premises caused by a covered cause of loss; (2) an action of a civil authority that prohibits access to the described premises; (3) loss resulting from that action; and (4) the action taken because of the damage. All four are satisfied here. The insured's own building need not be damaged - the fire next door is the trigger. The lost sales are measured against the pre-loss trend, and the extension runs for a limited period (up to four consecutive weeks), which easily covers six days, with the policy's 72-hour waiting period applying first.
A key detail to verify: the closure must actually prohibit access. A partial restriction or a traffic inconvenience is not enough.
The festival closure fails on the first element. There is no physical damage to property by a covered cause of loss anywhere - only a municipal decision to close the street. Civil authority coverage is not a general business interruption backstop for civic events, road construction projects or police actions unconnected to physical damage. The $20,000 is uninsured.
2. Analyze the supplier's plant fire. What category of dependent property is involved, what limits apply, and what should the insured do going forward?
Read the worked answer
The manufacturer is a direct dependent property - a property operated by others that the insured depends on to deliver materials it needs. Damage by a covered cause of loss (fire) at that location, causing loss of business income at the described premises, is within the dependent properties coverage that sits inside the Business Income form.
Two constraints govern the recovery. First, the built-in coverage carries a modest sub-limit that is far smaller than most insureds assume, and it typically must be accessed through the described dependent property schedule or the form's additional coverage; if the $150,000 exceeds that sub-limit, the excess is uninsured. Second, the loss must be attributable to the fire itself, with the same 72-hour waiting period and the same $500,000 limit applying to the combined business income result.
The right answer for the renewal is not to rely on the built-in coverage. The insured should schedule this supplier by name and location on a dependent properties form, with a limit tied to annual gross sales volume for that product line and to the number of weeks a replacement source would take to come on line. A second vendor for the affected line is the risk-management answer; a properly sized dependent properties limit is the insurance answer. If the supplier were a customer rather than a source of goods, it would be an indirect dependent property, insured under the same mechanism.
3. How should the $12,000 spent on the shuttle van, tent sale and temporary storage be handled, and how does it interact with the business income payment?
Read the worked answer
As Extra Expense, subject to the same limit and to the requirement that the spending reduce the loss.
Extra Expense pays reasonable expenses the insured would not have incurred but for the covered cause of loss, incurred to avoid or minimize the interruption. The shuttle, tent sale and temporary storage meet that test: without the closure, none of the spending would have occurred, and each item was aimed at keeping sales moving while the road was shut. The measure is not the amount spent but whether the expense reduced the business income loss - a $12,000 outlay that preserved, say, $60,000 of sales is plainly cost-effective, while an expense that produces no revenue would be scrutinized.
Because the closure is a civil authority loss, the extra expense is covered for the same limited period (up to four consecutive weeks) and does not require damage to the insured's own building. Under the combined form, the $12,000 and the business income recovery share the $500,000 limit; the insured must track them together rather than treating extra expense as a separate bucket.
One drafting point: the insured should confirm whether its program uses a combined limit or a separate extra expense limit, because the answer changes how much business income capacity remains for the supplier loss described above.