CLIA ACC study materials
CLIA ACC study resources

The Antarctic Booking That Should Not Be Sold Too Quickly

CLIA ACC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Antarctic Booking That Should Not Be Sold Too Quickly

Clients aged 78 and 74 want an 11-day Antarctic expedition on a 190-passenger ship, including the Drake Passage and daily Zodiac landings. Both have controlled hypertension; one had a hip replacement eight months ago and walks with a cane. They are fit for daily life but have not traveled outside North America. The trip is in seven months and costs $28,000 per person, excluding flights and evacuation insurance. They have no travel insurance yet. The operator's medical form asks about mobility and recent surgery, and the operator reserves the right to require a doctor's clearance. The clients say, 'We are not old; we are experienced travelers,' and ask the advisor to 'just book it' because the deposit is refundable for 48 hours.

1. How should the advisor assess suitability without making an age-based judgment?

Read the worked answer

Assess function and risk, not age. Age is not a disqualifier, and the clients are right that experience matters. But Antarctic expedition travel makes specific physical demands: stepping from a ship into a moving Zodiac, sitting on an inflatable pontoon, landing on wet or icy shores, walking over uneven terrain, and remounting the Zodiac in cold conditions. The hip replacement eight months ago and the use of a cane are relevant to those demands, not to the clients' character.

The advisor should ask concrete questions: Can the client walk 200 meters over uneven ground without stopping? Can she climb two or three steps while holding a rope? Can she get up from a low seated position? Has the surgeon cleared her for adventure travel and for falls risk? What medications are needed, and can they be managed on a small ship? How did the clients handle previous flights, crowds, and motion sickness?

The advisor should not decide for the operator, but should explain that the operator's medical form and expedition leader will make the final call. A useful framing is: 'This is not a standard cruise. The question is not whether you are old, but whether the Zodiac operations are safe for your hip and balance on the landing days.' That respects the clients while testing the real constraint.

2. What must the clients understand about medical evacuation, insurance, and operator discretion before paying?

Read the worked answer

The clients need to understand three separate risks before the 48-hour refund window closes.

First, medical evacuation from Antarctica is not like evacuation from a Caribbean port. It can require a ship diversion, helicopter support, weather delays, and transport to a distant hospital. The cost can be very high, and ordinary domestic health insurance may not cover it. The clients should obtain written confirmation from an insurance provider that the policy covers expedition travel, emergency evacuation from remote areas, and pre-existing conditions if applicable. They should not assume the cruise line's medical facility is a hospital.

Second, cancellation coverage matters. The trip costs $28,000 per person before flights. If one client has a hip complication or a cardiac event before departure, the deposit and final payment may be at risk. Cancel-for-any-reason coverage, if available, should be compared with standard medical cancellation.

Third, the operator has discretion. The medical form is not a formality. The expedition leader or captain may restrict landings or require a doctor's clearance. A refundable deposit window is a chance to complete medical review, not a reason to delay it. The advisor should put these points in writing and get the clients to confirm they understand that a landing is not guaranteed.

3. What would make the advisor recommend a different itinerary or postpone?

Read the worked answer

The advisor should recommend a different itinerary or postpone if the surgeon will not clear the client for Zodiac boarding, if the client cannot reliably transfer from a seated position or walk on uneven ground, or if the clients are unwilling to buy adequate evacuation and cancellation coverage. A recent hip replacement with ongoing balance issues is a signal to look at a less demanding option, such as a small-ship scenic cruise that does not require wet landings, or an Arctic itinerary with more infrastructure and shorter evacuation distances.

The advisor should also consider the Drake Passage. Clients who have not traveled outside North America may underestimate two days of rough crossing each way. A fly-cruise option that crosses the Drake by air can reduce that exposure, but it adds cost and weather risk. Postponing may be appropriate if the hip is still improving or if the clients can train for mobility and return with a surgeon's clearance.

The key is not to refuse on age. The advisor should present a decision matrix: physical demands, medical clearance, insurance, budget, and tolerance for uncertainty. If the clients choose to proceed, document the disclosures and the operator's discretion. If they choose a different trip, explain why it reduces risk rather than framing it as a consolation prize.