CMP study materials
CMP study resources

Ceiling Height, Freight Elevators, and $34,000 of Scaffolding

CMP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Ceiling Height, Freight Elevators, and $34,000 of Scaffolding

A technology client is choosing between two venues for a 1,400-attendee, three-day user conference. The general session is 1,200 theater-style with a 40-foot stage, a 20-foot × 40-foot LED wall, and flown lighting; production needs 18 feet to rigging grid. Hotel A: 18,000 sq ft ballroom, 13'6" clear ceiling with chandeliers at 11 feet, a 5'8" × 8'0" 4,000 lb freight elevator, and a loading dock shared with the kitchen. $110,000 F&B minimum; 2,000 room-nights at $239. Hotel B: 22,000 sq ft column-free hall, 24-foot ceiling, drive-in ramp and exclusive dock. $138,000 F&B minimum; 2,000 room-nights at $269. The client's procurement lead prefers A because the rate is lower.

1. Do the like-for-like cost comparison. Which venue is actually cheaper?

Read the worked answer

Hotel A cannot fly anything. With 13'6" clear and chandeliers at 11 feet there is no usable rigging grid. Ground-support scaffolding for a 40-foot stage and a 20×40 wall runs about $34,000 and consumes roughly 1,600 sq ft of the 18,000 - which, with 1,200 theater seats, leaves nowhere for a rear tech position. Budget $6,000 to buy or borrow space.

  • Hotel A, true event cost: $110,000 + $34,000 + $6,000 = $150,000
  • Hotel B: $138,000, no scaffolding, drive-in load-in.

B is $12,000 cheaper on the event budget and removes the production constraint. A's lower rate is cheaper for the room block, not for the event.

Correct the framing on room rate. The $30 gap is paid by attendees, not by your budget. Across 2,000 room-nights that is $60,000 of attendee cost - a pickup and attrition risk, not a line item. Keep it out of the venue budget and put it squarely in the risk discussion, where the procurement lead will hear it as a different argument.

2. Beyond cost, what would you weigh, and how?

Read the worked answer

Weight what the event is for. A 20×40 LED wall is the client's headline launch mechanic. At Hotel A the ceiling forces a wall roughly 9 feet tall and a fundamentally different visual design. That is not a detail - it is the reason the client booked the show.

Load-in capability. A 5'8" × 8' elevator cannot take a road case more than about 5'6" once turned, and every load competes with the kitchen. For a 1,400-person tech build that is a two-day build and real overtime exposure.

Sightlines. Chandeliers at 11 feet sit directly in the projection line for any elevated rear seating.

Recommendation: Hotel B, contingent on negotiation. Push the $269 rate toward $255 with a rate cap and a courtesy room block. The $12,000 production saving funds part of that concession, and a capped rate protects the block pickup that Hotel A's lower rate would have bought you.

3. The client insists on Hotel A. What do you do?

Read the worked answer

Neither comply silently nor refuse. Price the consequence and redesign the show to fit the room.

Redesign:

  • Replace the flown wall with a ground-supported 12' × 32' wall trimmed at 9 feet.
  • Add two 12' × 16' IMAG side screens at 8 feet to recover the lost scale.
  • Move lighting to floor and truss positions and accept a lower stage trim.

Put it in writing as a change order - the $34,000 scaffold plus the reduced staging - so the design compromise is documented as the client's decision, not your failure to deliver.

Contractual protections if A is chosen regardless:

  • Written confirmation of whether the 13'6" is measured to slab or to chandelier mounts, and whether the chandeliers can be raised or removed.
  • Exclusive dock hours, not "coordinated with catering."
  • A load-in overtime cap.
  • A production rider approved in writing by the venue's technical department, not by the sales manager.