Pancyprian Product Dev III study materials
Pancyprian Product Dev III study resources

Pancyprian Product Dev III cheat sheet

Pancyprian Product Dev III · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Product Development Process and Lifecycle

  • Stage-gate model: Discovery → Scoping → Business Case → Development → Testing & Validation → Launch, with gates that require deliverables and go/kill/hold/recycle decisions.

  • Concurrent engineering overlaps phases to cut time-to-market; risk is higher rework if requirements freeze late.

  • Product lifecycle phases: Introduction, Growth, Maturity, Decline; marketing mix and pricing strategy (skimming vs penetration) change per phase.

  • Design freeze locks form, fit, and function; changes after freeze require engineering change orders (ECOs) with impact assessment on cost, schedule, and compliance.

  • NPD success metrics: time-to-market, development cost, product cost, quality (defects/recalls), and revenue from new products (e.g., % of sales from products < 3 years old).

  • Fuzzy front end (FFE) ends when the product concept is approved and a formal development project is chartered.

  • Platform vs derivative development: platforms share architecture across product families; derivatives reuse modules to lower cost and risk.

  • Spiral and agile hardware hybrids use iterative builds; each loop ends with a design review and updated risk register.

Quick reference

Design Thinking

  • Five modes (Stanford d.school): Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test; they are iterative, not strictly linear.

  • Define mode output is a point-of-view (POV) statement: [User] needs [need] because [insight].

  • Ideation rules: defer judgment, encourage wild ideas, build on others, one conversation at a time, stay on topic.

  • Divergent thinking generates options; convergent thinking selects using explicit criteria (desirability, feasibility, viability).

  • Prototype fidelity matches the question: low-fidelity for concept exploration, high-fidelity for usability and technical validation.

  • Test mode captures user feedback to refine POV and prototypes; a failed prototype is data, not failure.

  • Double Diamond (UK Design Council): Discover → Define (problem space), Develop → Deliver (solution space).

  • Design thinking complements analytical methods; it reduces uncertainty about user needs before large capital commitments.

Quick reference

Design Thinking, User Research and Requirements Analysis

  • Qualitative methods (interviews, contextual inquiry, diary studies) answer why; quantitative methods (surveys, analytics, A/B tests) answer how many/how much.

  • Sample size rule of thumb: 5–8 users per homogeneous segment uncover most usability problems in formative testing.

  • Requirements types: functional (what it does), non-functional (performance, safety, reliability), constraints (regulatory, budget, schedule).

  • MoSCoW prioritization: Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have (this time).

  • Kano model: Must-be (basic), Performance (linear), Attractive (delighters), Indifferent, Reverse; classify via paired functional/dysfunctional questions.

  • Voice of Customer (VOC) to CTQs (Critical to Quality) via QFD House of Quality; roof shows trade-offs between engineering characteristics.

  • User story format: As a [role], I want [goal] so that [benefit]; acceptance criteria define done.

  • Traceability matrix links each requirement to design element, test case, and verification method (test, inspection, analysis, demonstration).

Quick reference

Concept Generation

  • Concept generation methods: brainstorming, brainwriting (6-3-5), SCAMPER, TRIZ, morphological analysis, analogical transfer, and lead-user method.

  • SCAMPER prompts: Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify/Magnify, Put to other use, Eliminate, Reverse/Rearrange.

  • Morphological chart decomposes the problem into functions and lists means for each; combinations become concept variants.

  • TRIZ resolves contradictions using 40 inventive principles and the contradiction matrix; ideal final result (IFR) guides problem framing.

  • Pugh concept selection: datum concept vs alternatives scored +/–/0 against criteria; the winner becomes the new datum in later rounds.

  • Weighted decision matrix: score each concept per criterion (e.g., 1–5), multiply by weight, sum; sensitivity check on weights.

  • Functional decomposition breaks the overall function into sub-functions; each sub-function can be solved independently before recombination.

  • Concept screening should include manufacturing, cost, and IP/regulatory feasibility, not only performance.

Quick reference

Prototyping and Iterative Testing

  • Prototype taxonomy: physical vs analytical (simulation), comprehensive vs focused, low vs high fidelity.

  • Rapid prototyping: FDM (fused deposition modeling), SLA (stereolithography), SLS (selective laser sintering), and CNC machining for functional prototypes.

  • Design of Experiments (DOE): full factorial tests all combinations; fractional factorial screens many factors with fewer runs; response surface optimizes.

  • Taguchi methods use orthogonal arrays and signal-to-noise ratio to make designs robust to noise factors.

  • Usability testing metrics: task success rate, time on task, error rate, and satisfaction (e.g., SUS score; average SUS ≈ 68).

  • Iterative testing loop: build → test → analyze → revise; each iteration should answer a specific risk-reduction question.

  • Accelerated life testing (ALT) applies elevated stress (temperature, voltage, vibration) to estimate life using acceleration models (e.g., Arrhenius for thermal).

  • Verification confirms the design meets specified requirements; validation confirms the product meets user needs in the intended use environment.

Quick reference

Materials, Manufacturing and Technical Feasibility

  • Material selection criteria: mechanical properties (strength, stiffness, toughness), density, thermal/electrical properties, corrosion, cost, and recyclability.

  • Ashby charts plot material properties (e.g., strength vs density) to identify candidates; performance index M = σ/ρ for a lightweight tie.

  • Manufacturing processes: injection molding (high volume, tooling cost), CNC (flexible, low volume), sheet metal (bending, stamping), casting, and additive manufacturing.

  • Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA): minimize part count, standardize fasteners, design for insertion from one direction, avoid separate fasteners.

  • Tolerance stack-up: worst-case sums tolerances; statistical (root-sum-square) assumes independent distributions and yields tighter assembly tolerances.

  • Technical feasibility assesses capability (can we make it?), capacity (can we scale?), cost (can we hit target cost?), and risk (what could fail?).

  • Prototype-to-production transition: design for injection molding requires draft angles (typically 1–3°), uniform wall thickness, and radii to avoid warpage.

  • Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA): RPN = Severity × Occurrence × Detection; prioritize highest RPN for mitigation.

Quick reference

Sustainability, Safety, Quality and Regulatory Compliance

  • Circular economy strategies: reduce, reuse, repair, remanufacture, recycle; design for disassembly and material separation.

  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) phases per ISO 14040/14044: goal and scope, inventory analysis, impact assessment, interpretation.

  • Ecodesign requirements (EU): energy efficiency, material efficiency, recycled content, and durability; RoHS restricts hazardous substances; WEEE governs e-waste take-back.

  • CE marking indicates conformity with applicable EU directives/regulations; the manufacturer issues a Declaration of Conformity and maintains a technical file.

  • ISO 9001 quality management principles include customer focus, process approach, and continual improvement (Plan-Do-Check-Act).

  • Risk management per ISO 14971 (medical devices): identify hazards, estimate risk, evaluate, control, and monitor residual risk.

  • Safety hierarchy of controls: eliminate, substitute, engineering controls, administrative controls, PPE.

  • Quality tools: control charts (variable vs attribute), Pareto analysis (80/20), cause-and-effect (fishbone) diagram, and 8D problem solving.

Quick reference

Project Management, Teamwork and Communication

  • Triple constraint: scope, time, cost; quality sits at the center; changes to one affect the others.

  • Critical path method (CPM): longest path through the network determines project duration; float = late start − early start.

  • Earned Value Management: EV = % complete × BAC; CV = EV − AC; SV = EV − PV; CPI = EV/AC; SPI = EV/PV.

  • RACI matrix assigns Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed for each task; only one accountable per task.

  • Tuckman team stages: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, Adjourning.

  • Risk register records risk, probability, impact, score (P × I), owner, response (avoid, mitigate, transfer, accept).

  • Communication plan defines stakeholders, information, frequency, format, and channel; a RAID log tracks Risks, Assumptions, Issues, Dependencies.

  • Agile ceremonies: sprint planning, daily stand-up, sprint review, retrospective; roles: product owner, scrum master, development team.