REAC Qualifying Exam flashcards
REAC Qualifying Exam · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Polluter-pays principle
- The party responsible for causing pollution bears the cost of preventing, investigating, and remediating it, regardless of who currently owns the land or asset.
- Best Available Techniques
- The most effective and advanced stage of development in processes and operation methods, considering cost-benefit, that limits emissions and environmental impact.
- Cradle-to-grave responsibility
- Waste generators remain responsible for their waste from production through transport, treatment, and final disposal; downstream failure can return liability to the generator.
- Statutory nuisance
- A legal claim that unreasonable interference with land use causes harm; permit compliance does not automatically prevent a nuisance action being brought.
- Notifiable incident reporting
- Regulated events require prompt verbal notification and a written follow-up within a set period; failure to report is itself a breach.
- Risk equation
- Risk is the product of hazard and exposure. A hazard with no exposure pathway to a receptor presents no risk.
- Source-pathway-receptor model
- A risk exists only when a contaminant source is linked via a pathway to a receptor; breaking any link prevents exposure.
- Conceptual site model
- A documented representation of sources, pathways, receptors, and exposure linkages at a site; it defines what sampling and assessment must cover.
- Screening versus detailed assessment
- Screening compares site data to generic criteria; exceedance triggers site-specific detailed assessment using actual exposure parameters and toxicity values.
- ALARP principle
- Risk should be reduced as low as reasonably practicable, balancing risk reduction against cost and effort; zero risk is not the standard.
- Environmental impact assessment stages
- Screening, scoping, baseline description, impact prediction, mitigation design, reporting, and post-decision monitoring, including cumulative and transboundary effects.
- Representativeness
- The degree to which a sample reflects the true conditions of the population or area sampled; precise analysis of a non-representative sample remains invalid.
- Grab versus composite sample
- A grab sample captures conditions at one time and place; a composite averages over time or space and can mask peak concentrations.
- Holding time
- The maximum permitted interval between sample collection and analysis for a given analyte, beyond which results may be invalidated regardless of analysis quality.
- Field blank
- A clean sample carried through collection, transport, and analysis to detect contamination introduced during field handling rather than from the site.
- Chain of custody
- An unbroken documented record of sample possession, with names, dates, times, and signatures, supporting the admissibility and integrity of results.
- Data quality objectives
- Predefined statements of the decision to be made, the acceptable error rate, and the data needed, set before sampling begins.
- Precision versus accuracy
- Precision is reproducibility among replicate measurements; accuracy is closeness to the true value. A method can be precise but biased.
- Relative percent difference
- RPD = |a - b| divided by the mean of a and b, multiplied by 100; used to compare duplicate results against an acceptance criterion.
- Percent recovery
- Percent recovery equals measured concentration divided by expected concentration, multiplied by 100; assesses bias using spikes or reference materials.
- Limit of detection
- The lowest concentration distinguishable from zero with stated confidence; distinct from the limit of quantification, where acceptable precision is achieved.
- Matrix spike
- A sample aliquot fortified with a known amount of analyte to assess recovery in the actual sample matrix, revealing matrix interference effects.
- Measurement uncertainty
- A quantified range around a result expressing doubt about its value; decision-making against limits should account for it.
- Laboratory accreditation
- Independent confirmation that a laboratory meets a competence standard such as ISO/IEC 17025; it does not guarantee any individual result is correct.
- Report essential elements
- Purpose, scope, methods, results, limitations, and conclusions, presented so an independent reader could reproduce and interpret the work.
- Reference conditions in reporting
- Results must state temperature, pressure, and dry or wet basis, because concentrations vary with these conditions and are not interchangeable.
- Data qualifiers
- Codes attached to results, such as estimated or non-detect, with a legend, indicating validation status and how the value should be used.
- Exceedance reporting content
- Identify the limit, measured value, duration, and corrective action taken; state whether the result is confirmed or provisional.
- Version control
- Each revision carries date, author, reviewer, and approval, with superseded versions clearly marked so readers use the current document.
- Conflict of interest disclosure
- Any financial or personal interest that could bias judgement must be disclosed in writing and managed, or the work declined.
- Competence boundary
- Practitioners must decline or qualify work beyond their expertise rather than overstate capability, and should refer to a qualified specialist.
- Independence in assessment
- Those who prepare an assessment should not be the sole verifiers of it; separating preparation from review preserves objectivity.