I85PREP
⌘ K
REAC Qualifying Exam study materials
REAC Qualifying Exam study resources

REAC Qualifying Exam practice questions

One question at a time. Build your REAC Qualifying Exam understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Regulatory and Legal Framework

Under the regulatory framework governing research ethics committees, which body in the United States is primarily responsible for issuing assurances that an institution will comply with federal human-subjects regulations?

  1. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Correct answer.
  2. The Institutional Review Board (IRB)
  3. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  4. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Explanation

OHRP administers the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects and issues Federalwide Assurances to institutions. The FDA regulates clinical investigations of regulated products but does not issue the general assurance. An IRB reviews protocols locally but is not the federal assurance-issuing body.

Question 2Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher wants to enroll prisoners in a study of a condition that affects both prisoners and non-prisoners. Under the federal human-subjects regulations, which requirement applies to the selection of prisoners as subjects?

  1. Prisoners may be enrolled only if the study offers a direct benefit to each participant
  2. Prisoners may be enrolled freely because informed consent removes any special concern
  3. Prisoners may be enrolled only when a court order authorizes their participation
  4. Prisoners may be enrolled when the research is limited to conditions particularly affecting prisoners as a class Correct answer.

Explanation

Subpart C permits prisoner research when the study concerns conditions particularly affecting prisoners as a class or when it examines prisons as institutions, among other conditions. A general requirement of individual direct benefit is not the governing standard, and consent alone does not resolve the coercive context. Courts do not authorize enrollment in this way.

Question 3Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which element is required for informed consent under the Common Rule but is often overlooked when researchers draft consent forms?

  1. A list of all co-investigators and their credentials
  2. A statement that the subject will be paid for participation
  3. A description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts Correct answer.
  4. A guarantee that the subject will benefit from the research

Explanation

The Common Rule requires consent to describe reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject. Payment is not a mandatory element, benefits cannot be guaranteed, and listing investigators is not a required disclosure.

Question 4Regulatory and Legal Framework

A study initially approved with a waiver of documentation of consent later changes its procedures so that participants will undergo an invasive biopsy. What is the most appropriate regulatory action?

  1. Obtain verbal consent from participants and document it in the research record
  2. Continue under the existing waiver because the IRB already approved the study
  3. Notify the funding agency only and proceed with the biopsy
  4. Submit an amendment to the IRB for review before implementing the change Correct answer.

Explanation

Changes to approved research must be reviewed and approved by the IRB before implementation, unless necessary to eliminate an apparent immediate hazard. An invasive biopsy materially alters risk and consent requirements, so an amendment is required. Verbal consent alone does not substitute for IRB review of the changed procedures.

Question 5Regulatory and Legal Framework

Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, which of the following is a valid way to use identifiable health information for research without individual authorization?

  1. Use of a limited data set under a data use agreement Correct answer.
  2. Use of the information after removing only the subject's name
  3. Use of the information if the study has IRB approval alone
  4. Use of the information if the researcher is a covered entity employee

Explanation

A limited data set may be used for research with a data use agreement, without individual authorization. Removing only the name is insufficient because many other identifiers remain. Employment status and IRB approval alone do not waive the authorization requirement under HIPAA.

Question 6Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which statement best describes the role of a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) in a federally funded clinical trial?

  1. It reviews consent forms for readability before enrollment begins
  2. It replaces the IRB's continuing review responsibilities
  3. It is required for every study that enrolls more than ten participants
  4. It independently monitors data and safety and can recommend that a trial be modified or stopped Correct answer.

Explanation

A DSMB reviews accumulating data and safety information and may recommend continuation, modification, or termination. It does not replace IRB continuing review, is not triggered by a simple enrollment threshold, and does not perform consent-form readability review.

Question 7Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher plans to conduct a survey study that collects sensitive information about illegal behavior, and the only record linking the subject to the data would be the consent document. Under the Common Rule, what is the most relevant consideration for waiving documentation of consent?

  1. Whether the survey will be conducted online or in person
  2. Whether the funding source is federal or private
  3. Whether the researcher has previously published similar studies
  4. Whether the principal risk is the potential harm from a breach of confidentiality Correct answer.

Explanation

The regulations allow waiver of documentation when the only record linking the subject and the research would be the consent document and the principal risk would be harm from a breach of confidentiality. Mode of survey administration, prior publications, and funding source are not the governing criteria.

Question 8Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following best characterizes the legal status of the Common Rule's provisions on institutional review boards?

  1. They are advisory guidelines with no binding legal effect
  2. They are adopted by many federal departments and agencies through a common policy Correct answer.
  3. They apply only to research involving FDA-regulated products
  4. They apply only to research funded by the Department of Health and Human Services

Explanation

The Common Rule is a federal policy adopted by many departments and agencies, making its provisions binding for covered research. It is not limited to HHS funding or FDA-regulated products, and it is not merely advisory.

Question 9Regulatory and Legal Framework

A study involves a legally authorized representative providing consent for an adult who lacks decision-making capacity. Which statement reflects the regulatory approach?

  1. A court must always appoint the representative before enrollment
  2. The representative must be a licensed physician
  3. Representative consent is never permitted for research involving more than minimal risk
  4. The IRB must consider whether the subject's assent can be obtained and whether representation is appropriate Correct answer.

Explanation

The regulations defer to IRB review of the appropriateness of surrogate consent and require consideration of the subject's assent where possible. Representative consent is not categorically barred, court appointment is not always required, and the representative need not be a physician.

Question 10Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which action constitutes a reportable unanticipated problem involving risks to subjects or others?

  1. A minor deviation from the approved consent script that did not affect any subject
  2. A change in the study's funding source
  3. An unexpected serious adverse event that is possibly related to the research and suggests increased risk Correct answer.
  4. A scheduled protocol amendment submitted before implementation

Explanation

An unanticipated problem is unexpected, related or possibly related to the research, and suggests that subjects or others are at greater risk of harm. Minor deviations without effect, planned amendments, and funding changes do not meet that definition.

Question 11Regulatory and Legal Framework

Under the regulations, which of the following is a criterion for IRB approval of research?

  1. The sponsor has obtained a patent on the intervention
  2. The principal investigator has prior experience with the same population
  3. Risks to subjects are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits Correct answer.
  4. The study is guaranteed to produce statistically significant results

Explanation

IRB approval requires that risks be minimized and reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, among other criteria such as equitable selection and informed consent. Statistical significance, investigator experience, and patents are not approval criteria.

Question 12Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher wants to use leftover blood samples that were collected for clinical care and are stored with identifiers. Which framework primarily governs whether the researcher may access them for research?

  1. Only institutional biosafety rules
  2. HIPAA plus applicable human-subjects regulations, depending on identifiability and funding Correct answer.
  3. Only the Common Rule, because the samples are not FDA-regulated
  4. Only the Declaration of Helsinki

Explanation

Identifiable leftover specimens implicate both HIPAA (authorization or waiver) and human-subjects regulations when the research is covered. The Common Rule alone is incomplete, biosafety rules address different hazards, and the Declaration of Helsinki is a statement of principles rather than the operative domestic legal framework.

Question 13Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following best describes the concept of 'equitable selection' of subjects in research?

  1. Choosing subjects based on the investigator's convenience
  2. Selecting subjects who are easiest to recruit to reduce costs
  3. Ensuring that the burdens and benefits of research are distributed fairly across populations Correct answer.
  4. Selecting only subjects who can pay for the experimental intervention

Explanation

Equitable selection requires fair distribution of research burdens and benefits, avoiding over-reliance on vulnerable or convenient populations. Cost reduction, ability to pay, and investigator convenience are precisely the concerns the principle seeks to prevent.

Question 14Regulatory and Legal Framework

An investigator receives a subpoena for research records that contain identifiable participant data. What is the most appropriate first step under typical regulatory and institutional requirements?

  1. Immediately release the records because a subpoena is a court order
  2. Notify the media to ensure transparency
  3. Destroy the records to protect confidentiality
  4. Consult the institution's legal counsel and the IRB before disclosing identifiable data Correct answer.

Explanation

Researchers should consult institutional counsel and the IRB before responding to legal demands for identifiable data, since confidentiality commitments and certificates of confidentiality may affect the response. Immediate release, destruction, and media notification are inappropriate.

Question 15Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following is true about Certificates of Confidentiality issued for federally funded research?

  1. They prohibit disclosure of identifiable information in any legal proceeding, with limited exceptions Correct answer.
  2. They apply only to research involving genetic testing
  3. They expire immediately when the study ends
  4. They replace the need for IRB review

Explanation

Certificates of Confidentiality protect identifiable research information from compelled disclosure, subject to limited exceptions such as voluntary consent or certain legal requirements. They do not eliminate IRB review, are not limited to genetic research, and have specific rules about duration.

Question 16Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher at a university wants to conduct a study involving a new medical device. Which regulatory pathway is most likely to apply in addition to IRB review?

  1. The Common Rule only, because devices are exempt
  2. Investigational Device Exemption regulations from the FDA Correct answer.
  3. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's workplace rules
  4. The Federal Trade Commission's advertising rules

Explanation

Clinical investigations of medical devices are generally subject to FDA's Investigational Device Exemption regulations, alongside IRB review. Devices are not categorically exempt from the Common Rule, and FTC or OSHA rules do not govern device trials.

Question 17Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following is a key difference between the roles of the IRB and the institutional official (IO)?

  1. The IO reviews protocols, while the IRB signs assurances
  2. Both perform identical functions
  3. The IO conducts consent interviews, while the IRB monitors data
  4. The IRB reviews protocols, while the IO has authority to sign assurances and suspend or terminate approval Correct answer.

Explanation

The IRB reviews and approves research, while the institutional official has authority to sign assurances and can suspend or terminate IRB approval. Their functions are distinct, not identical, and neither description of consent interviews or data monitoring fits.

Question 18Regulatory and Legal Framework

A study proposes to enroll children in research that offers no prospect of direct benefit and involves greater than minimal risk. Under the federal pediatric regulations, which additional condition must be satisfied?

  1. The research must be approved by the FDA
  2. The research must be funded by a private foundation
  3. The research must be completed within one year
  4. The research must present experiences to subjects that are reasonably commensurate with those inherent in their actual or expected medical, dental, psychological, social, or educational situations Correct answer.

Explanation

Subpart D permits greater than minimal risk research without direct benefit only under specified conditions, including that the intervention presents experiences reasonably commensurate with those in the child's actual or expected situations. FDA approval, funding source, and duration are not the governing conditions.

Question 19Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which statement about the requirement for continuing review of research under the Common Rule is accurate?

  1. Continuing review replaces the need for reporting adverse events
  2. Continuing review may be eliminated for certain minimal-risk studies under the revised rule Correct answer.
  3. Continuing review is performed by the funding agency
  4. Continuing review is required annually for all studies without exception

Explanation

The revised Common Rule removes the requirement for continuing review in certain circumstances, such as minimal-risk studies, while requiring other oversight mechanisms. It is not universally annual, is not performed by funders, and does not replace adverse-event reporting.

Question 20Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher wants to conduct research with a tribe that has its own research review processes. Which approach best reflects the legal and ethical framework?

  1. Obtain individual consent and ignore tribal governance
  2. Engage tribal leadership and follow applicable tribal research review requirements in addition to IRB review Correct answer.
  3. Conduct the research only if funded by the federal government
  4. Proceed after IRB approval alone, since tribal law does not apply to research

Explanation

Research involving tribal communities should engage tribal governance and comply with applicable tribal review requirements alongside IRB review. Tribal law can apply, individual consent does not displace community processes, and federal funding is not the trigger for respecting tribal authority.

Question 21Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following is a required element of the HIPAA authorization for research use of protected health information?

  1. A guarantee that the data will never be shared
  2. The subject's social security number
  3. The researcher's home address
  4. A description of the information to be used or disclosed and the purpose of the use or disclosure Correct answer.

Explanation

HIPAA authorization must describe the information, the purpose, the recipients, an expiration, and the right to revoke, among other elements. Guarantees of non-sharing, the researcher's home address, and social security numbers are not required elements.

Question 22Regulatory and Legal Framework

A study protocol includes a procedure that poses more than minimal risk to subjects with no prospect of direct benefit. Which statement best reflects how an IRB should evaluate the risk-benefit relationship?

  1. The IRB must find that the risks are reasonable in relation to the importance of the knowledge expected to result Correct answer.
  2. The IRB must reject any study without direct benefit regardless of knowledge gained
  3. The IRB should defer the decision to the principal investigator
  4. The IRB may approve the study only if the sponsor guarantees compensation for all harms

Explanation

The IRB must determine that risks are minimized and reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, and, when there is no direct benefit, to the importance of the knowledge expected. Studies without direct benefit are not categorically barred, compensation guarantees are not the standard, and the IRB cannot defer its judgment.

Question 23Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following best describes the purpose of an assurance of compliance filed with OHRP?

  1. To transfer IRB oversight to the federal government
  2. To certify that a study will produce publishable results
  3. To certify that an institution will comply with federal human-subjects regulations for covered research Correct answer.
  4. To exempt an institution from all human-subjects regulations

Explanation

An assurance commits an institution to comply with federal human-subjects regulations for covered research. It does not certify publication outcomes, transfer oversight to the government, or exempt the institution from regulation.

Question 24Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher plans to conduct a study involving a vulnerable population of economically disadvantaged individuals and offers a large payment for participation. Which concern is most directly implicated?

  1. Lack of statistical power
  2. Undue influence on the voluntariness of consent Correct answer.
  3. Inadequate laboratory space
  4. Failure to obtain a patent

Explanation

Large payments to economically disadvantaged individuals may constitute undue influence, undermining voluntary consent. Statistical power, patents, and laboratory space are unrelated to the ethical concern raised by the payment structure.

Question 25Regulatory and Legal Framework

Which of the following statements about the FDA's informed consent requirements for clinical investigations is accurate?

  1. They are entirely separate from and unrelated to the Common Rule
  2. They permit consent to be obtained after the investigational product is administered
  3. They include required elements similar to the Common Rule, with additional requirements for applicable clinical trials Correct answer.
  4. They apply only to studies conducted outside the United States

Explanation

FDA informed consent regulations share many elements with the Common Rule and add requirements for applicable clinical trials, such as a statement about posting on ClinicalTrials.gov. They are not unrelated to the Common Rule, do not permit retroactive consent, and are not limited to foreign studies.

Question 26Regulatory and Legal Framework

Under the Common Rule, which body has the authority to approve, require modifications to, or disapprove a research protocol before it may begin?

  1. The research subject advocate assigned to the study
  2. The sponsoring federal department secretary
  3. The principal investigator's department chair
  4. The convened institutional review board or an authorized expedited reviewer Correct answer.

Explanation

The Common Rule vests review authority in an IRB, which may act through a convened quorum or an expedited reviewer designated under the regulation. Department chairs and subject advocates have no regulatory approval authority, and federal department secretaries do not approve individual protocols.

Question 27Regulatory and Legal Framework

A clinical investigation is designed to evaluate a new implant under an FDA-regulated pathway. Which document describes the investigator's commitments, including adherence to the protocol and IRB oversight, and is signed before the investigation begins?

  1. The statement of investigator (Form FDA 1572) Correct answer.
  2. The institutional conflict-of-interest disclosure
  3. The investigational plan amendment log
  4. The device master record

Explanation

For FDA-regulated drug and biologic studies the investigator signs a statement of investigator (Form FDA 1572) agreeing to conduct the study per the protocol and applicable regulations. It is the formal mechanism by which the investigator accepts regulatory obligations before the study starts.

Question 28Regulatory and Legal Framework

An IRB conducting initial review of a protocol finds that risks are minimized and reasonable, selection is equitable, and informed consent will be sought, but the protocol lacks any provision for monitoring collected data to ensure subject safety. Which regulatory determination is most appropriate?

  1. Approve the study conditionally but allow enrollment to begin immediately
  2. Refer the protocol to the institutional official for a final approval decision
  3. Approve the study because data monitoring is only required for Phase III trials
  4. Defer approval until the investigator adds an adequate data monitoring plan Correct answer.

Explanation

The Common Rule's approval criteria require that, where appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure subjects' safety. Because that element is missing, the IRB cannot make the required findings and should withhold approval until the plan is corrected.

Question 29Regulatory and Legal Framework

An investigator wants to enroll prisoners in a study of a condition that also affects the general population. Which requirement applies specifically to research involving prisoners as subjects?

  1. A prisoner representative must serve on the reviewing IRB Correct answer.
  2. The study must be funded by the Department of Justice
  3. Consent must be obtained from the warden instead of the prisoner
  4. The research must be limited to studying incarceration or criminal behavior

Explanation

Subpart C requires that at least one member of the IRB reviewing prisoner research be a prisoner or prisoner representative with appropriate background. The research also must fall within permitted categories, but it need not be limited to incarceration studies or DOJ-funded work.

Question 30Regulatory and Legal Framework

A research team plans to enroll pregnant women in a study of a new antihypertensive. Which regulatory framework governs the inclusion of pregnant women as subjects in federally conducted or supported research?

  1. 21 CFR Part 50 Subpart D
  2. Subpart B of 45 CFR 46 Correct answer.
  3. Subpart A of 45 CFR 46 only
  4. Subpart D of 45 CFR 46

Explanation

Subpart B of the Common Rule addresses additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses, and neonates. Subpart D covers children, and the FDA's child-research provisions appear in 21 CFR Part 50 Subpart D, not pregnancy.

Question 31Regulatory and Legal Framework

A subject enrolled in a minimal-risk study tells the investigator she wants to withdraw. She asks that the data already collected about her be destroyed. Under the Common Rule, how should the investigator respond?

  1. The investigator must destroy all data on request because withdrawal is absolute
  2. The investigator must obtain IRB permission before acknowledging the withdrawal
  3. The investigator must report the withdrawal to OHRP within five business days
  4. The investigator may retain and analyze data already collected, absent a contrary agreement Correct answer.

Explanation

The Common Rule provides that a subject's withdrawal does not require the investigator to destroy data already collected, though the subject may request it and the protocol or consent form may address destruction. The investigator should explain what will happen to the data and honor any applicable agreement.

Question 32Regulatory and Legal Framework

A study team wants to rely on an IRB at another institution rather than its own. Under the Common Rule's cooperative research provisions, what is required for this arrangement?

  1. The reviewing IRB must document the reliance arrangement and the institutions must have an agreement Correct answer.
  2. Each institution must separately review and approve the protocol
  3. The arrangement is permitted only for research funded by a single federal department
  4. The relying institution must send an observer to every convened meeting

Explanation

The revised Common Rule requires that cooperative research use a single IRB for review of the study, documented through a reliance agreement, with certain exceptions. The reviewing IRB and relying institutions must record the arrangement rather than duplicate review.

Question 33Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher plans to conduct a study using a survey that asks about participants' illegal drug use, with responses recorded without identifiers. Which regulatory provision most directly supports a waiver of the requirement to document informed consent?

  1. The research presents no more than minimal risk and involves no identifiers linking responses to subjects Correct answer.
  2. The research involves no vulnerable populations
  3. The research has been reviewed by an expedited reviewer
  4. The research is conducted by a federal employee

Explanation

The Common Rule permits an IRB to waive documentation of consent when the only record linking the subject to the research would be the consent document and the principal risk would be harm from a breach of confidentiality, or when the research presents no more than minimal risk and involves no procedures requiring written consent. Here the anonymous survey fits the minimal-risk, no-identifier rationale.

Question 34Regulatory and Legal Framework

An IRB approves a study with a consent form that omits a statement that participation is voluntary and refusal involves no penalty. Which regulatory requirement has most clearly been violated?

  1. The requirement that consent include a statement about voluntariness and the right to withdraw Correct answer.
  2. The requirement that consent describe reasonably foreseeable risks
  3. The requirement that consent be signed and dated by the subject
  4. The requirement that consent be written at an eighth-grade reading level

Explanation

The Common Rule lists as a basic element of consent a statement that participation is voluntary, that refusal involves no penalty or loss of benefits, and that the subject may discontinue at any time. Omitting that statement directly violates a required element.

Question 35Regulatory and Legal Framework

A sponsor wants to add a new study procedure that increases risk to enrolled subjects. Which action must occur before the change is implemented, absent an immediate hazard to subjects?

  1. The investigator must obtain IRB approval of the amendment before implementing it Correct answer.
  2. The investigator must re-consent all subjects before seeking approval
  3. The investigator must notify OHRP and wait thirty days
  4. The investigator may implement the change and notify the IRB afterward

Explanation

Changes to approved research must be reviewed and approved by the IRB before implementation, unless a change is necessary to eliminate an apparent immediate hazard to subjects. In that narrow case the investigator may act first and report promptly afterward.

Question 36Regulatory and Legal Framework

A study enrolls adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The IRB is concerned that the consent process may not ensure adequate understanding. Which approach best satisfies the regulatory expectation for safeguarding consent in this population?

  1. Excluding all individuals with the diagnosis regardless of decision-making ability
  2. Adding an independent assessment of understanding and ongoing consent monitoring Correct answer.
  3. Relying solely on a longer consent document with more detail
  4. Obtaining consent from a family member for every participant

Explanation

When subjects are likely to have impaired decision-making, the IRB should require safeguards such as independent assessment of capacity or understanding, waiting periods, or monitoring of the consent process. Blanket exclusion is not required, and surrogate consent is used only when the individual lacks capacity.

Question 37Regulatory and Legal Framework

A researcher wants to obtain identifiable private information from a hospital's medical records for a retrospective study. Under HIPAA, which document would most directly authorize the covered entity to disclose that information to the researcher for the study?

  1. An IRB waiver of informed consent under the Common Rule
  2. A data use agreement between the researcher and the hospital
  3. A valid HIPAA research authorization signed by each subject Correct answer.
  4. A certificate of confidentiality issued by NIH

Explanation

HIPAA permits a covered entity to disclose protected health information for research with a valid authorization meeting 45 CFR 164.508, or alternatively under a waiver of authorization or a limited data set with a data use agreement. For identifiable data disclosed without a waiver, the signed authorization is the operative document.

Question 38Regulatory and Legal Framework

A device study is exempt from most FDA informed consent requirements because it meets the criteria for an emergency research exception. Which condition is essential for invoking that exception?

  1. The device has already received marketing approval for another indication
  2. The investigator has obtained a waiver of authorization from the IRB
  3. The situation is life-threatening, available treatments are unproven or unsatisfactory, and the research could not practicably be carried out otherwise Correct answer.
  4. The subjects' legally authorized representatives are available to give prospective consent

Explanation

The emergency research exception in 21 CFR 50.24 requires, among other things, that the subject's condition be life-threatening, that available treatments be unproven or unsatisfactory, and that the research could not practicably be carried out without the exception. Additional requirements include community consultation and public disclosure.

Question 39Regulatory and Legal Framework

A foreign collaborator will conduct a study with human subjects in another country using federal funds. Which statement best describes the applicable human subjects protections?

  1. US regulations apply only if the host country lacks any research law
  2. The study is exempt because it occurs outside US jurisdiction
  3. US regulations apply, and the institution may use host-country protections if they are equivalent Correct answer.
  4. Only the host country's laws apply, and US regulations are inapplicable

Explanation

The Common Rule applies to federally funded research conducted by a US institution, including research performed abroad. An IRB may accept the host country's procedures in place of some US requirements when those procedures offer protections equivalent to the Common Rule.

Question 40Regulatory and Legal Framework

An IRB member has a significant financial interest in a company sponsoring a protocol under review. What is the appropriate regulatory response?

  1. The member may participate fully if the interest is disclosed to the chair
  2. The member must be recused from the review and vote, and the IRB should document the conflict Correct answer.
  3. The member may participate if the conflict is disclosed in the consent form
  4. The member may vote but must abstain from discussion

Explanation

An IRB member with a conflicting interest in a protocol should not participate in its initial or continuing review, except to provide information requested by the IRB. The conflict and recusal must be documented in the IRB's records.

Question 41Environmental Assessment Principles

Under the CEQ regulations implementing NEPA, which document is prepared when an agency's proposed action is categorically excluded from detailed analysis but the agency wants to establish a record supporting that determination?

  1. An environmental impact statement
  2. A categorical exclusion documentation memorandum Correct answer.
  3. A finding of no significant impact
  4. A notice of intent

Explanation

Agencies document categorical exclusion determinations in a written record (often a memorandum or checklist) that cites the established category and verifies no extraordinary circumstances apply. This record supports the agency's decision that detailed NEPA analysis is unnecessary.

Question 42Environmental Assessment Principles

In environmental assessment practice, the term 'scoping' most precisely refers to which activity?

  1. Ranking public comments by the number received
  2. Determining the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts to be examined in a NEPA analysis Correct answer.
  3. Selecting the contractor who will prepare the environmental document
  4. Estimating the total construction cost of a proposed project

Explanation

Scoping is the early process of identifying the significant issues, reasonable alternatives, and impacts that warrant detailed treatment in an environmental document. It narrows the analysis so resources focus on issues that matter.

Question 43Environmental Assessment Principles

An agency prepares an environmental assessment and concludes that the action will not significantly affect the human environment. What document must accompany that conclusion?

  1. A record of decision
  2. A finding of no significant impact Correct answer.
  3. An environmental impact statement
  4. A supplemental environmental impact statement

Explanation

When an EA shows no significant impact, the agency issues a finding of no significant impact that briefly presents the reasons the action will not have a significant effect. The FONSI makes the EA publicly available and supports the decision.

Question 44Environmental Assessment Principles

Which statement best describes the 'human environment' as interpreted in NEPA practice?

  1. It is limited to air and water quality
  2. It refers exclusively to workplace safety conditions
  3. It covers only federally owned land
  4. It includes the natural and physical environment and the relationship of people to that environment Correct answer.

Explanation

CEQ guidance interprets the human environment broadly to include natural, physical, social, and economic conditions and the interrelationships of people with those conditions. Analysis therefore considers effects such as community disruption and socioeconomic change, not just pollution.

Question 45Environmental Assessment Principles

A proposed highway project will displace 40 households and increase noise at a nearby school. These effects are best classified as which type of impact?

  1. Indirect impacts
  2. Socioeconomic and community impacts Correct answer.
  3. Short-term construction impacts
  4. Cumulative impacts

Explanation

Displacement of residents and noise affecting a school are effects on the community and its socioeconomic conditions, which fall under socioeconomic and community impact analysis. They are direct effects of the project on people and neighborhoods.

Question 46Environmental Assessment Principles

Which of the following is the best example of a cumulative impact?

  1. Dust generated during the excavation phase of a single project
  2. Increased traffic on a road one year after a project opens
  3. Wetland loss from a project combined with wetland loss from three other permitted projects in the same watershed Correct answer.
  4. Erosion on a construction site during a storm

Explanation

Cumulative impacts arise from the incremental effects of an action added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. Combining wetland losses across several projects in one watershed is the classic example.

Question 47Environmental Assessment Principles

In NEPA analysis, the 'no action' alternative typically serves which purpose?

  1. It represents the agency's preferred alternative by default
  2. It establishes a baseline against which the effects of the proposed action and other alternatives are compared Correct answer.
  3. It automatically eliminates the need to analyze other alternatives
  4. It is required only when the project receives federal funding

Explanation

The no action alternative describes what would happen if the agency did not undertake the proposal, providing a baseline for comparing environmental consequences. It is analyzed even when the agency has no discretion to decline the action, in which case it reflects continuation of current conditions.

Question 48Environmental Assessment Principles

Which criterion is most directly used to decide whether an impact is 'significant' under NEPA?

  1. The total dollar cost of the project
  2. The number of pages in the environmental document
  3. The intensity and context of the impact Correct answer.
  4. The political party of the reviewing official

Explanation

Significance is assessed using context (the setting of the action) and intensity (severity of the effect), as described in CEQ regulations. Factors include magnitude, duration, geographic extent, and effects on public health and unique resources.

Question 49Environmental Assessment Principles

An agency plans to issue a permit for a facility that may significantly affect the environment. What is the first formal step in the EIS process?

  1. Issuing a record of decision
  2. Preparing a finding of no significant impact
  3. Circulating a draft EIS for comment
  4. Publishing a notice of intent to prepare an EIS Correct answer.

Explanation

The EIS process begins with a notice of intent published in the Federal Register, which announces the agency's intention and initiates scoping and public involvement. Only after scoping does the agency prepare and circulate the draft EIS.

Question 50Environmental Assessment Principles

Which document formally records an agency's decision after completing an environmental impact statement and states which alternatives were considered?

  1. Finding of no significant impact
  2. Notice of intent
  3. Record of decision Correct answer.
  4. Environmental assessment

Explanation

The record of decision is the public record of the agency's final decision after an EIS, identifying alternatives considered and the environmentally preferable alternative. It also describes mitigation measures and monitoring commitments.