Carport Conversion: Vent Sizing and a 14-Foot Trap Arm
You are called to a 1976 single-wall duplex in Hilo where the owner has converted a 240 sq ft carport into a studio. The new work adds a two-compartment laundry sink and a washer standpipe. Existing DWV: a 3 in. ABS building drain under the slab, 42 ft to the county sewer, laid at 1/8 in. per foot, and a single 1-1/2 in. vent stack at the far end of the building serving both existing bathrooms, each with a water closet, lavatory, and tub/shower. The plan is to connect the laundry group into the 3 in. drain at a wye near the upstream end and to vent it with a 1-1/2 in. individual vent run 14 ft horizontally to the existing stack, tying in 4 ft above the highest fixture rim. The washer standpipe is set 24 in. above its trap, and the trap arm falls at 1/4 in. per foot. The county plan reviewer has written two comments: "vent sizing" and "trap arm." There are no drawings beyond a hand sketch, and the owner wants the concrete patch kept small.
1. Is the existing 1-1/2 in. vent stack adequate for the added laundry group? Show the fixture-unit reasoning and state what you would verify in the field.
Read the worked answer
Count the load the stack actually carries, not just the branch you are adding. Two bathroom groups at roughly 6 fixture units each (water closet 3, lavatory 1, tub/shower 2) is 12 FU; the laundry sink at 2 FU plus the washer standpipe at 2 FU adds 4 FU, so the single stack would serve about 16 FU. In the UPC stack/vent sizing tables a 1-1/2 in. stack tops out in the single digits (on the order of 8 FU), so 16 FU is roughly double its limit: the stack needs to be at least 2 in., and it should be checked as a common vent for the two bathroom groups as well. Verify against the edition your county adopts rather than the sketch. Field checks: which fixtures actually discharge into that stack, the number of offsets and developed length, and the tie-in elevation. A vent connected below the flood-level rim of any fixture it serves is a drain, not a vent, so the 4 ft above the highest rim is fine only if nothing on that stack sits higher. If the stack cannot be upsized inside the wall, the fallback is a separate 1-1/2 in. vent to the roof.
2. Explain why the 14 ft trap arm is a problem and give three ways to correct it, including at least one that does not require a new roof penetration.
Read the worked answer
A trap arm is protected only until it has dropped one pipe diameter of fall; past that point the arm is draining rather than venting, and the trap seal goes by siphonage or back pressure. At 1/4 in. per foot, 14 ft of arm falls 3.5 in., well over the 1-1/2 in. allowed, and the trap-arm length table caps a 1-1/2 in. arm at about 6 ft developed length regardless of fall. Corrections: first, relocate the vent connection to within the table distance of the trap; going to a 2 in. arm buys about 8 ft, which still does not reach 14 ft, so one vent alone will not solve it. Second, run an individual 1-1/2 in. vent from the standpipe trap up through the wall and terminate it through the roof or a side wall at the clearances the code sets. Third, an approved air-admittance valve on the laundry branch, if the county's amendment permits AAVs, installed accessible and above the flood-level rim per the listing; or wet-vent the laundry to the lavatory only if the wet-vent rules and the branch layout genuinely support it.
3. Before adding the laundry load to the existing 3 in. building drain at 1/8 in. per foot, what do you check, and what could change your answer?
Read the worked answer
Capacity is not the concern: a 3 in. drain at 1/8 in. per foot carries well over 40 fixture units, and 4 FU is noise. The concerns are condition and geometry. First, does the 1976 slab drain actually still have 1/8 in. per foot? A settled or bellied run under a Hilo slab may be flat or back-pitched, so camera the line and shoot elevations with a laser before tying in; if it is holding water, the new load is not the problem to solve, the drain is. Second, the fitting: a wye or combination, drainage pattern, installed in the direction of flow, with the branch at the required slope to the wye. Third, cleanouts: check the developed length and direction changes from the new wye to the nearest existing cleanout, because adding a branch can trigger a required cleanout. Fourth, material and support: cast iron to ABS transitions need shielded couplings, and the wye must be supported, not hanging off the concrete patch. Any of these findings can turn a small patch into a bigger scope, so price it that way.