HKIS LSD APC Part I Written Assessment study plan
HKIS LSD APC Part I Written Assessment · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Statutory framework: Buildings Ordinance, Lands Ordinance and related Hong Kong legislation & Professional practice, ethics and the role of the Authorized Person (Surveying)
Map the Buildings Ordinance structure: identify the roles and powers of the Building Authority, the meaning of 'building works' and 'street works', and the plan-submission and approval sequence, writing a one-page flow diagram from memory.
Trace how the Lands Ordinance, lease conditions and the Buildings Ordinance interact for a single hypothetical site, listing at least six statutory touchpoints in order.
Draft a table of the professional and statutory duties of an Authorized Person (Surveying) under the AP/RSE/RC registration regime, distinguishing duties owed to the client, the Building Authority and the public.
Resolve three short ethics scenarios (conflict of interest, certifying non-compliant work, pressure to backdate a record) against a written reasoning template that names the duty, the risk and the correct action.
Your checkpoint
A 2-page 'statutory map' plus a 1-page AP duty and ethics reference card, self-tested with 20 recall questions scored at 80% or better.
Statutory framework: Buildings Ordinance, Lands Ordinance and related Hong Kong legislation & Land administration, lease conditions, land exchange and modification
Summarise the lease-modification and land-exchange routes (lease modification, land exchange, short-term waiver) into a comparison table covering trigger, process, premium considerations and survey input.
Explain how lease conditions (user clause, building covenant, height and site coverage restrictions) constrain a development proposal, using one worked example with numbers.
List the statutory notices, appeals and enforcement powers relevant to unauthorised building works and identify where survey evidence is decisive.
Write a 10-point checklist an AP would use before advising a client to apply for a lease modification.
Your checkpoint
A comparison table of the three land-disposal routes plus a 400-word worked example showing how a lease restriction changes a development envelope.
Land boundary survey, boundary determination and boundary disputes
Describe the boundary-determination process in Hong Kong: the status of the Land Survey Ordinance, the role of the Authorized Land Surveyor, and how boundary plans and survey records are lodged and used.
Distinguish fixed, approximate and undetermined boundaries, and explain the evidentiary weight of lot boundaries, government leases and registered plans.
Work through two boundary-dispute scenarios and draft the survey evidence an expert would present (measurements, plan references, occupation versus documentary boundary).
Produce a step-by-step field and office procedure for a boundary re-establishment survey, including control, observations, computations and independent checks.
Your checkpoint
A 3-page boundary-dispute case note with a sketched plan, the evidence chain and a reasoned conclusion on where the boundary lies.
Geodetic and engineering surveying, control networks and deformation monitoring & Survey instrumentation, calibration, accuracy standards and quality assurance
Explain the Hong Kong geodetic reference framework, the role of the geodetic control network and the difference between geodetic, grid and ground coordinates, with a numeric transformation example.
Design a deformation-monitoring scheme for a slope or a tall structure: choose instrument, epoch interval, reference points, and define alert and action thresholds.
Compare total station, GNSS and digital level accuracy specifications and match each to a stated task, justifying the choice with numbers.
Draft a calibration and verification routine for a total station and a level, including field checks, records and the action taken when a check fails.
Your checkpoint
A one-page monitoring scheme with accuracy budget (expected precision versus required tolerance) plus a calibration log template.
Setting out, construction survey and as-built verification & Topographic and cadastral mapping, GIS and survey data management
Produce a setting-out procedure for a building corner and grid line, covering control establishment, pre-computation, field marking, and independent as-built verification against tolerance.
Explain how as-built surveys are used to verify compliance with approved plans and lease conditions, and what an AP should do when deviation exceeds tolerance.
Define a topographic survey specification: scale, contour interval, feature codes, positional accuracy and deliverable formats for a GIS-ready dataset.
Set up a small GIS data model (layers, attributes, coordinate system, metadata) for a cadastral or topographic dataset and document its quality checks.
Your checkpoint
A setting-out and as-built verification package: pre-computation sheet, field record, deviation table against tolerance, and a short GIS data dictionary.
Site supervision, safety, contract administration and professional liability & Professional practice, ethics and the role of the Authorized Person (Surveying)
Outline the site supervision duties of an AP: inspection regime, supervision plan, record keeping and reporting to the Building Authority.
Summarise the key safety obligations on construction sites (site safety plan, supervision of works, reporting of accidents) and how the AP's role interacts with the contractor's.
Explain contract administration basics: interim payment certification, variations, extension of time and the surveyor's role in measurement and valuation.
Analyse professional liability exposure (negligent certification, inaccurate survey, reliance by third parties) and state the controls that reduce it.
Your checkpoint
A supervision and inspection plan for a hypothetical site, plus a one-page liability risk register with mitigations.
Case-based professional judgement and report writing
Practise structuring a professional report: executive summary, facts, methodology, analysis, conclusion and recommendations, with clear separation of fact and opinion.
Write two short reports from supplied facts (a boundary discrepancy and a monitoring exceedance) to a fixed template and word limit.
Apply professional judgement to three ambiguous scenarios and justify the chosen course of action against statutory duty, ethics and client interest.
Review a weak sample report and rewrite it to eliminate unsupported conclusions and unclear recommendations.
Your checkpoint
Two complete 600-word professional reports to the template, each with an explicit judgement section and recommendations.
Professional practice, ethics and the role of the Authorized Person (Surveying) & Statutory framework: Buildings Ordinance, Lands Ordinance and related Hong Kong legislation & Land boundary survey, boundary determination and boundary disputes & Geodetic and engineering surveying, control networks and deformation monitoring & Topographic and cadastral mapping, GIS and survey data management & Setting out, construction survey and as-built verification & Land administration, lease conditions, land exchange and modification & Survey instrumentation, calibration, accuracy standards and quality assurance & Site supervision, safety, contract administration and professional liability & Case-based professional judgement and report writing
Consolidate all ten domains into a one-page summary sheet of key statutes, standards, tolerances and procedures.
Complete a full timed mock under exam conditions and mark it against the plan's criteria, logging every weak area.
Re-study the three weakest domains using targeted notes and re-test with 30 recall questions.
Rehearse concise written answers for case-based questions, practising the report structure under time pressure.
Your checkpoint
A timed mock paper completed with a marked score, a one-page consolidation sheet, and a written list of remaining gaps with a revision action for each.
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain, without notes, the AP's statutory duties and the three land-disposal routes, and score 80% or better on the week 1-2 recall set.
Week 4: Can defend a boundary determination and a deformation-monitoring design in writing, showing the evidence chain and the accuracy budget against stated tolerance.
Week 6: Can produce a setting-out and as-built verification record and a supervision plan that a reviewer would accept as complete and internally consistent.
Week 8: Timed mock completed with a marked score, all ten domains represented in the consolidation sheet, and every identified gap assigned a revision action.