SIMAK UI KKI study plan
SIMAK UI KKI · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Program Sarjana (S1 Reguler) & Program Sarjana Kelas Khusus Internasional (S1 KKI)
Map the full SIMAK UI KKI test structure (TPA/Verbal, TPA/Numerik, TPA/Figural, Bahasa Inggris, and Matematika Dasar or Sains depending on chosen faculty) and record the item count and time limit for each section in a single reference sheet
Diagnose baseline performance by completing one timed mini-set per section (about 15 items each) and logging raw score, time used, and error type for every wrong answer
Build a personal error taxonomy with at least five categories (misread question, concept gap, calculation slip, time pressure, vocabulary gap) and tag every baseline mistake to one category
Set a target score per section that is at least one standard deviation above your baseline, and convert it into a per-item time budget in seconds
Your checkpoint
A one-page diagnostic dashboard listing section-by-section baseline scores, time budgets, and the five-category error tally for at least 60 attempted items
Program Sarjana (S1 Reguler) & Program Sarjana Kelas Khusus Internasional (S1 KKI)
Drill TPA Numerik under a hard timer, focusing on ratio, percentage, average, and series-completion patterns, and re-solve every missed item from scratch without looking at the solution
Drill TPA Verbal by classifying each analogy and antonym item by relationship type (cause-effect, part-whole, degree, function) before choosing an answer
Practice TPA Figural by describing each pattern rule aloud in one sentence before selecting an option, to build explicit rule recognition
Complete two full mixed TPA sets of 40 items each within the official time limit and compare accuracy against week 1 baseline
Your checkpoint
A log of 100 solved TPA items with relationship or rule annotations for each, plus a before/after accuracy comparison against the week 1 baseline
Program Sarjana (S1 Reguler) & Program Sarjana Kelas Khusus Internasional (S1 KKI)
Strengthen English section readiness by completing two timed reading comprehension sets and underlining the sentence that justifies each answer
Build a 60-entry academic English vocabulary list from your own reading errors, with a synonym and one original example sentence per entry
Practice structure-and-written-expression items by identifying the grammatical function of the underlined segment before eliminating options
Write two 150-word English summaries of short academic passages in 10 minutes each to build speed under the KKI English standard
Your checkpoint
A 60-entry vocabulary and grammar error notebook plus two timed 150-word English summaries scored against a self-made rubric
Program Sarjana (S1 Reguler) & Program Sarjana Kelas Khusus Internasional (S1 KKI)
Take one full-length simulated test under strict timing, including the mathematics or science section required by your target faculty
Analyze the simulation by mapping every error back to the week 1 taxonomy and ranking the top three loss sources by points lost
Re-teach yourself the two weakest quantitative topics using worked examples you write out yourself, not copied solutions
Adjust your per-section time budget based on observed pacing data from the simulation
Your checkpoint
A simulation report showing total score, per-section score, points lost per error category, and a revised time-budget table
Program Sarjana RPL (Rekognisi Pembelajaran Lampau) & Program Vokasi (D3 & D4)
Compare the admission pathways for S1 Reguler, S1 KKI, RPL, and D3/D4 vocational programs by listing required documents, eligibility rules, and selection instruments for each in a comparison table
Draft a recognition-of-prior-learning portfolio outline that maps your work experience or certifications to specific learning outcomes, with at least three evidence items per outcome
Identify five concrete differences between vocational competence standards and academic program expectations, and note how each affects what you would submit
Write a 300-word personal statement draft tailored to one chosen pathway, referencing the specific selection criteria you identified
Your checkpoint
A pathway comparison table covering four programs plus a 300-word personal statement draft with a mapped evidence list
Program Profesi & Program Magister (S2)
Outline the structure of a graduate-level research proposal: problem statement, research gap, question, method, and expected contribution, in one page
Critique two published abstracts in your field by identifying the research gap each claims and the method each uses, then note one weakness per abstract
Practice academic English writing by producing a 250-word literature-gap paragraph with at least four correctly cited paraphrases in your own words
Prepare answers to five likely interview questions for professional or master's admission, covering motivation, academic readiness, and career plan
Your checkpoint
A one-page research proposal skeleton plus a 250-word literature-gap paragraph and written answers to five interview questions
Program Spesialis & Program Doktor (S3)
Draft a doctoral or specialist research roadmap that states a tentative dissertation topic, two candidate research questions, and the methodological approach for each
Assemble a publication and portfolio inventory listing your outputs with venue, year, and your specific contribution, and flag gaps against typical doctoral expectations
Write a 400-word statement of research intent that connects your prior work to the proposed topic and names two potential supervisors' research areas
Rehearse a five-minute verbal research pitch and record it, then review the recording for clarity, structure, and time control
Your checkpoint
A research roadmap document with topic, two research questions, methodology, publication inventory, and a recorded five-minute pitch
Program Sarjana (S1 Reguler) & Program Sarjana Kelas Khusus Internasional (S1 KKI)
Take a second full-length simulated test and compare every section score against the week 4 simulation to quantify improvement
Consolidate all error notebooks into a single 20-item pre-exam review sheet covering only the highest-frequency mistake types
Rehearse exam-day logistics: section order, allowed breaks, calculator or stationery rules, and a pacing plan written as a minute-by-minute schedule
Finalize and proofread all application documents for your chosen pathway, checking each against the eligibility checklist from week 5
Your checkpoint
A final readiness pack containing the second simulation report, a 20-item review sheet, a minute-by-minute pacing plan, and a completed document checklist
Milestones
Week 2: You can complete a 40-item mixed TPA set within the official time limit with at least 60 percent accuracy, and every missed item has a written relationship or rule annotation
Week 4: Your full-length simulation total score exceeds the week 1 baseline estimate by at least 15 percent, and your top three point-loss sources are identified with a revised time budget for each section
Week 6: You have a one-page research proposal skeleton, a 250-word literature-gap paragraph with four cited paraphrases, and a completed four-program pathway comparison table
Week 8: Your second simulation improves on the week 4 simulation in at least three of four sections, and your final readiness pack is complete with a proofread document checklist