Core or periphery? The cross-border North-West region
The cross-border North-West region (Donegal, Leitrim, Sligo, Derry/Strabane) has 390,000 people. Services employ 64%, manufacturing 19% and agriculture 4%. Unemployment is 6.9% against 4.1% nationally, and GDP per capita is 71% of the EU average. In five years, 28% of 18–24 year olds have left; 41% of workers commute more than 30 minutes; only 18% hold a degree, compared with 39% nationally. A €45 million Cross-Border Skills Park is proposed on a former barracks site. It promises 2,000 temporary construction jobs and 600 permanent tech and manufacturing jobs. Critics warn it will mainly draw skilled workers from existing firms and benefit the eastern side of the region. The project needs matched funding of €9 million from two governments and an environmental assessment within 14 months.
1. Using the data, assess whether the North-West region is best described as a core or a peripheral region.
Read the worked answer
Core regions typically have high income, diverse high-value employment, high education levels, in-migration and good accessibility. Peripheral regions have lower income, reliance on lower-value sectors, out-migration and weaker infrastructure.
The data point to peripheral status: GDP per capita is 71% of the EU average, unemployment is 6.9% against 4.1%, only 18% hold a degree against 39%, and 28% of young adults leave within five years. The commuting figure (41% over 30 minutes) suggests a dispersed population and weaker local labour markets. Agriculture at 4% and manufacturing at 19% show a narrower economic base than a core service region.
However, services at 64% show the region is not simply agricultural; it has a substantial service sector. The cross-border location also gives EU market access and potential. Internal contrasts matter: Derry/Strabane and Donegal have different profiles, so one label hides variation. Overall, the region is best described as peripheral relative to national and EU cores, but with pockets of core-like activity and cross-border potential.
2. Evaluate the likely economic and social impacts of the proposed Cross-Border Skills Park.
Read the worked answer
Economic positives: 2,000 construction jobs during the build phase and 600 permanent jobs; a €45 million investment with €9 million matched funding; reuse of a former barracks site; and tech/manufacturing jobs that could raise the skills profile and keep graduates locally. A skills park could attract further firms and create a positive multiplier through local spending.
Economic risks: construction jobs are temporary, and 600 permanent jobs may be fewer than the skilled workers drawn from existing firms. If displacement is high, net job creation could be near zero. The criticism that the eastern side benefits suggests uneven distribution; if western peripheries are not connected, internal core-periphery patterns may be reinforced. The environmental assessment and 14-month deadline could delay or dilute the project.
Social impacts: training and higher wages could reduce out-migration of 18–24 year olds and raise the 18% degree figure through part-time study. But if jobs require degrees, the 82% without one may not benefit; house prices and congestion could rise. Cross-border governance is an asset, but matched-funding conditions may favour measurable outputs over local need.
Judgement: the park is worthwhile only with binding targets for local recruitment, training for those without degrees, and a western-side access plan. Otherwise it risks being a costly displacement scheme.
3. Identify one group likely to benefit and one group likely to lose from the Skills Park, and explain why.
Read the worked answer
Beneficiary: young people with degrees or tech qualifications, especially those considering emigration. The park offers 600 permanent jobs and training links, so they can stay in the region; the 28% out-migration figure suggests this group is currently underserved. Construction workers also benefit from 2,000 temporary jobs.
Loser: existing small firms, especially on the eastern side. If the park draws their skilled staff with higher wages, they face recruitment problems and higher wage bills. Low-skilled workers without a degree may also lose relatively: the tech and manufacturing jobs may require qualifications that 82% of the region lacks, while house prices and congestion rise. Western-side residents could lose if investment concentrates east.
The key judgement is distributional: the project may enlarge the total economy without producing a fairer one. The council should attach conditions - local hiring quotas, training places for low-skilled workers and transport links - to convert potential losers into beneficiaries.