Israel Patent Attorney Exam study materials
Israel Patent Attorney Exam study resources

Israel Patent Attorney Exam study plan

Israel Patent Attorney Exam · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Patent Law and the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967

  • Map the structure of the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967 chapter by chapter, noting which sections govern grant, opposition, revocation and term.

  • Distinguish the roles of the Registrar, the Israel Patent Office and the courts by listing which decisions each body is competent to make under the Law.

  • Explain in writing how the Law treats examination, publication and the rights conferred by a granted patent, citing section numbers from memory.

  • Identify the statutory definitions and interpretive provisions that recur across the exam (invention, patentee, priority date, professional representative).

Your checkpoint

A one-page annotated section map of the Patents Law linking each major chapter to the domain it serves.

Week 2

Patentability: novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, exclusions & Patent Law and the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967

  • Apply the novelty test to short fact patterns, distinguishing anticipation from mere disclosure and handling prior use and prior publication.

  • Analyse inventive step using the problem-and-solution approach and articulate why a given combination would or would not be obvious.

  • Test industrial applicability and list the categories of subject matter excluded from patentability under the Law.

  • Compare novelty and inventive step outcomes on the same hypothetical to check for reasoning errors.

Your checkpoint

Five worked patentability opinions of 150-200 words each, each ending with a clear allow/reject conclusion.

Week 3

Patent Application Drafting, Claims and Specification

  • Draft an independent claim set for a mechanical and a pharmaceutical invention, controlling breadth against the disclosed embodiments.

  • Write a specification with a background, problem, embodiments and claim-supporting description that satisfies sufficiency.

  • Revise a deliberately overbroad claim into a defensible one and record the reasoning for each narrowing amendment.

  • Check unity of invention across a multi-claim draft and split or restructure where required.

Your checkpoint

A complete draft application (abstract, specification, 8-12 claims) for one invention, with a self-review checklist scored against drafting criteria.

Week 4

Patent Prosecution before the Israel Patent Office: examination, objections, amendments, oppositions

  • Sequence the prosecution workflow from filing through examination, response to objections and grant, noting statutory time limits.

  • Draft a response to an office action that addresses each objection without adding matter.

  • Explain the grounds, timing and procedure for opposition and for post-grant revocation.

  • Classify which amendments are permissible at each stage and which would be refused.

Your checkpoint

A simulated office-action response plus a one-page timeline of prosecution deadlines and amendment limits.

Week 5

International and Regional Patent Law: Paris Convention, PCT, TRIPS, priority & Patent Prosecution before the Israel Patent Office: examination, objections, amendments, oppositions

  • Apply the Paris Convention priority rules, including the twelve-month window and the effect of a first filing.

  • Trace a PCT application from international filing through national phase entry before the Israel Patent Office.

  • State the core TRIPS obligations that shape Israeli substantive law and identify where national law departs or adds.

  • Resolve priority-chain problems involving multiple filings and partial priority.

Your checkpoint

A priority and PCT decision tree that answers ten short timing scenarios with the correct date and forum.

Week 6

Substantive Patent Law: infringement, validity, defenses, remedies, assignment and licensing & Supplementary Protection Certificates and pharmaceutical/patent term extension

  • Analyse infringement by mapping claim limitations onto an accused product and distinguishing literal from equivalent infringement.

  • Build a validity defence and list the statutory and equitable defences available to an alleged infringer.

  • Select remedies appropriate to a given breach and explain the basis for injunctive relief and damages.

  • Draft the key clauses of an assignment and a licence, covering scope, territory, royalties and termination.

  • Explain the eligibility conditions and calculation of a supplementary protection certificate for pharmaceutical patents.

Your checkpoint

A case memorandum of 400-500 words covering infringement, validity, remedies and SPC eligibility for one pharmaceutical scenario.

Week 7

Other Intellectual Property: trademarks, designs, copyright, trade secrets & Professional Ethics, Client Representation and Privilege

  • Contrast the subject matter and term of trademarks and designs with patents and state the registration route for each.

  • Explain copyright subsistence and ownership in works created by employees and contractors.

  • Identify what qualifies as a trade secret and the steps a client must take to preserve protection.

  • Apply the professional ethics rules on conflicts of interest, confidentiality and client communication to short scenarios.

  • Describe the scope of professional privilege attaching to client communications with a patent attorney.

Your checkpoint

A two-column comparison table of the four non-patent IP regimes plus five ethics scenarios answered in 50-80 words each.

Week 8

Procedure, Evidence and Appeals before the Registrar and the Courts & Patent Law and the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967 & Substantive Patent Law: infringement, validity, defenses, remedies, assignment and licensing

  • Map the procedural route from a Registrar decision to appeal before the courts, including time limits and scope of review.

  • State the rules on evidence, burden of proof and expert testimony in contested patent proceedings.

  • Run two full timed mock exams and score each domain separately to locate remaining weak areas.

  • Revisit the two lowest-scoring domains and rewrite the notes that failed you.

Your checkpoint

Two completed timed mock exams with a scored domain breakdown and a one-page list of residual weak points.

Milestones

Week 2: Can decide novelty and inventive step on unseen fact patterns in under 15 minutes each with a written conclusion.

Week 4: Can draft a compliant office-action response and recite prosecution deadlines without notes.

Week 6: Scores at least 70% on a self-made mixed set covering domains 1-7, with SPC rules stated accurately.

Week 8: Both mock exams completed within time, with no domain scoring below 60% and a written remediation list for the weakest two.