Israel Patent Attorney Exam study plan
Israel Patent Attorney Exam · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Patent Law and the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967
Map the structure of the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967 chapter by chapter, noting which sections govern grant, opposition, revocation and term.
Distinguish the roles of the Registrar, the Israel Patent Office and the courts by listing which decisions each body is competent to make under the Law.
Explain in writing how the Law treats examination, publication and the rights conferred by a granted patent, citing section numbers from memory.
Identify the statutory definitions and interpretive provisions that recur across the exam (invention, patentee, priority date, professional representative).
Your checkpoint
A one-page annotated section map of the Patents Law linking each major chapter to the domain it serves.
Patentability: novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, exclusions & Patent Law and the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967
Apply the novelty test to short fact patterns, distinguishing anticipation from mere disclosure and handling prior use and prior publication.
Analyse inventive step using the problem-and-solution approach and articulate why a given combination would or would not be obvious.
Test industrial applicability and list the categories of subject matter excluded from patentability under the Law.
Compare novelty and inventive step outcomes on the same hypothetical to check for reasoning errors.
Your checkpoint
Five worked patentability opinions of 150-200 words each, each ending with a clear allow/reject conclusion.
Patent Application Drafting, Claims and Specification
Draft an independent claim set for a mechanical and a pharmaceutical invention, controlling breadth against the disclosed embodiments.
Write a specification with a background, problem, embodiments and claim-supporting description that satisfies sufficiency.
Revise a deliberately overbroad claim into a defensible one and record the reasoning for each narrowing amendment.
Check unity of invention across a multi-claim draft and split or restructure where required.
Your checkpoint
A complete draft application (abstract, specification, 8-12 claims) for one invention, with a self-review checklist scored against drafting criteria.
Patent Prosecution before the Israel Patent Office: examination, objections, amendments, oppositions
Sequence the prosecution workflow from filing through examination, response to objections and grant, noting statutory time limits.
Draft a response to an office action that addresses each objection without adding matter.
Explain the grounds, timing and procedure for opposition and for post-grant revocation.
Classify which amendments are permissible at each stage and which would be refused.
Your checkpoint
A simulated office-action response plus a one-page timeline of prosecution deadlines and amendment limits.
International and Regional Patent Law: Paris Convention, PCT, TRIPS, priority & Patent Prosecution before the Israel Patent Office: examination, objections, amendments, oppositions
Apply the Paris Convention priority rules, including the twelve-month window and the effect of a first filing.
Trace a PCT application from international filing through national phase entry before the Israel Patent Office.
State the core TRIPS obligations that shape Israeli substantive law and identify where national law departs or adds.
Resolve priority-chain problems involving multiple filings and partial priority.
Your checkpoint
A priority and PCT decision tree that answers ten short timing scenarios with the correct date and forum.
Substantive Patent Law: infringement, validity, defenses, remedies, assignment and licensing & Supplementary Protection Certificates and pharmaceutical/patent term extension
Analyse infringement by mapping claim limitations onto an accused product and distinguishing literal from equivalent infringement.
Build a validity defence and list the statutory and equitable defences available to an alleged infringer.
Select remedies appropriate to a given breach and explain the basis for injunctive relief and damages.
Draft the key clauses of an assignment and a licence, covering scope, territory, royalties and termination.
Explain the eligibility conditions and calculation of a supplementary protection certificate for pharmaceutical patents.
Your checkpoint
A case memorandum of 400-500 words covering infringement, validity, remedies and SPC eligibility for one pharmaceutical scenario.
Other Intellectual Property: trademarks, designs, copyright, trade secrets & Professional Ethics, Client Representation and Privilege
Contrast the subject matter and term of trademarks and designs with patents and state the registration route for each.
Explain copyright subsistence and ownership in works created by employees and contractors.
Identify what qualifies as a trade secret and the steps a client must take to preserve protection.
Apply the professional ethics rules on conflicts of interest, confidentiality and client communication to short scenarios.
Describe the scope of professional privilege attaching to client communications with a patent attorney.
Your checkpoint
A two-column comparison table of the four non-patent IP regimes plus five ethics scenarios answered in 50-80 words each.
Procedure, Evidence and Appeals before the Registrar and the Courts & Patent Law and the Israel Patents Law, 5727-1967 & Substantive Patent Law: infringement, validity, defenses, remedies, assignment and licensing
Map the procedural route from a Registrar decision to appeal before the courts, including time limits and scope of review.
State the rules on evidence, burden of proof and expert testimony in contested patent proceedings.
Run two full timed mock exams and score each domain separately to locate remaining weak areas.
Revisit the two lowest-scoring domains and rewrite the notes that failed you.
Your checkpoint
Two completed timed mock exams with a scored domain breakdown and a one-page list of residual weak points.
Milestones
Week 2: Can decide novelty and inventive step on unseen fact patterns in under 15 minutes each with a written conclusion.
Week 4: Can draft a compliant office-action response and recite prosecution deadlines without notes.
Week 6: Scores at least 70% on a self-made mixed set covering domains 1-7, with SPC rules stated accurately.
Week 8: Both mock exams completed within time, with no domain scoring below 60% and a written remediation list for the weakest two.