A 22-worker unit with Rs 40,000 to spend: which safety hazards come first?
A garment unit in Faridabad employs 22 workers on 18 machines. The fusing press stands in a 3 m x 2.5 m room with a window, but the exhaust fan has not worked for two months and the operator has worked 9-hour shifts there since. On one overlocker the needle guard has been removed because it 'slows the operator down'. Four machines run from a single six-socket extension board plugged into one 16 A point, and the cable runs across the aisle. Cotton lint is swept only on Saturdays. There is no fire extinguisher, and the first-aid box holds an expired antiseptic, no sterile gauze and no gloves. Noise in the finishing section measures about 92 dB(A). Workers sit on backless stools for the whole shift. The owner has Rs 40,000 to spend this month and asks you to fix 'the most important things first'.
1. Rank these hazards by risk and choose the first three to spend the Rs 40,000 on, with reasons and approximate costs.
Read the worked answer
Method: risk = severity x likelihood, assessed over the whole shift, not per single event. Exposure matters: a hazard present 9 hours a day has a far higher likelihood of harm than an occasional one.
Ranking:
- Needle guard removed on the overlocker. High severity (finger or eye penetration) and very high likelihood (every hour of use), and it was removed deliberately, so it will stay off. Cost to refit is trivial - a few hundred rupees, at most Rs 1,000.
- Electrical overload. Four machines on one six-socket extension board on a single 16 A point, with the cable across an aisle, is a fire and electrocution hazard: severity very high, likelihood moderate to high with daily flexing and trip risk. Fix by a proper distribution board, industrial sockets, and cable routed in conduit or a covered tray - about Rs 8,000-12,000.
- Dead exhaust on the fusing press. Continuous solvent and adhesive fume exposure for a full shift, with long-term respiratory harm and possible skin sensitisation; severity high, likelihood high because the exposure is every day. Repair or replace the fan and duct it to open air - about Rs 5,000-7,000.
Then, within the same budget: fire extinguisher and restocked first-aid box (mandatory, about Rs 5,000), ear plugs with fitting instruction for the finishing area (about Rs 2,000), and backrest stools for the seated operators (about Rs 8,000). That totals roughly Rs 30,000-35,000 of the Rs 40,000. Lint sweeping becomes a daily end-of-shift routine at zero cost.
2. Using one hazard in this unit, explain why PPE is described as the last line of defence.
Read the worked answer
Take the finishing section at 92 dB(A), which is above the 90 dB(A) eight-hour limit. Handing out ear plugs looks like a solution, but it depends entirely on the worker: the plug has to be the right size, inserted correctly every time, worn for the whole shift, and replaced when soiled. A poorly fitted plug can deliver far less attenuation than the figure printed on the packet, and a worker who removes it for a conversation is unprotected. The noise still exists at source and still reaches everyone else in the room.
Compare the alternatives in order of reliability:
- Elimination or substitution: buy quieter overlockers or move the noisy operation into a separate room - removes the exposure.
- Engineering control: enclose the machine, fit anti-vibration mounts, fit the exhaust fan and duct it outside - reduces the hazard for everyone, and keeps working without depending on behaviour.
- Administrative control: job rotation to cut individual exposure time, signage, training.
- PPE: ear plugs, gloves, goggles - the last resort, because it protects only the wearer, only while it is worn correctly, and does nothing to the hazard.
The needle guard makes the same point from the other direction: it is an engineering control, not PPE. Once it is back on, the operator cannot put a finger into the needle path, whatever their mood or speed.
3. Which records and legal duties should this unit have in place, and what will an inspector ask for first?
Read the worked answer
Legal position: with 22 workers and power-driven machines the unit meets the Factories Act definition (ten or more workers with power), so registration and the associated duties apply, not a purely informal arrangement. That is the first thing an inspector tests.
Records an inspector asks for first:
- Factory registration or licence, displayed.
- Worker register with names, ages and attendance, and proof that no worker below 18 is on a hazardous job.
- Accident and near-miss register - including the overlocker guard removal, whether or not anyone was hurt.
- PPE issue register signed by each worker, with the date and item issued.
- Machine maintenance log showing the exhaust fan repair, the electrical work and the guard replacement, with dates.
- First-aid box checklist with expiry dates and the trained first-aider's name.
- Training records: fire drill, machine guarding, safe use of the fusing press, and material safety data sheets for the fusing adhesive.
Why the paperwork matters commercially, not just legally: the buyer's social-compliance audit asks for exactly these records. A unit with a repaired machine but no maintenance log fails the audit just as surely as one with a broken machine, because the auditor cannot see that a system exists. Photograph the repaired exhaust and guard, date the entries, and keep the register in one place.