Choosing a Relief Camp Before the Mahanadi Peak
In the last week of August, the sub-divisional magistrate of a block in Gariaband district must shift 340 people from three low-lying villages on the right bank of the Mahanadi near its confluence with the Pairi and Sondur. The IMD has forecast 180 mm of rain in the catchment over 48 hours, and the Water Resources Department has started releasing water from a reservoir upstream on the Mahanadi. The gauge at the nearest bridge reads 3.1 m below the danger level and is rising about 30 cm an hour. Two sites are offered. Site A is a government school on a mound 1.2 km from the river, about 8 m above the bed, with six rooms, a hand pump and no power; it is reached by a 3 km approach road of which 600 m is a causeway that flooded in the last high flood. Site B is a community hall 400 m from the river, about 3.5 m above the bed, on the main road with power and one large hall; elders say water reached its steps in the flood of 2019. One farmer refuses to leave because he must guard his pumpset and two cattle.
1. Which site do you recommend, and what conditions must be checked before people are moved there?
Read the worked answer
I would recommend Site A, but only as a camp after two verifications and with an evacuation plan for the approach road.
The reasoning is the flood line, not convenience. Site B is 3.5 m above the bed and elders recall water at its steps in 2019, so it lies within the highest recorded flood level and is not a safe shelter; a hall that floods becomes a trap because 340 people cannot be moved again at night. Site A is on a mound 8 m above the bed and 1.2 km from the river, which gives both elevation and distance. Proximity to the main road is irrelevant if the water arrives.
Before shifting people I would check: (i) the actual highest flood level mark at Site A and whether the school plinth is above it; (ii) whether the 600 m causeway will submerge, and if so, move people before the peak or use Site B only as a daytime transit point, never as an overnight camp; (iii) drinking water from the hand pump - get it tested; (iv) space: six rooms cannot hold 340 people, so tents, tarpaulins and a kitchen area must be pre-positioned; (v) separate screened space for women, a safe corner for children, lighting and a medical post; (vi) toilet pits away from the hand pump and from the drainage line. I would also inform the SDM in writing that occupancy of a school must end as soon as the water recedes so that classes resume.
2. As the police officer assisting the evacuation, how do you handle the farmer who refuses to leave, and why is that approach the correct one?
Read the worked answer
I would treat this as a persuasion problem first and a legal problem last. The farmer is not defying the law; he is protecting assets worth his season's income, and he fears looting more than the water.
The steps, in order: talk to him with the village elder or the patwari present, in his own language; fix a time by which the water is expected to cut the causeway, so he sees a deadline rather than an order; offer a solution for the cattle by shifting them to a high mound or to a neighbour's shed on higher ground, with a receipt for the animals and a named person responsible; give him a written acknowledgement of the pumpset's condition before he locks the shed, so the theft fear is addressed; and take his mobile number and the number of the beat constable on duty so he can report.
If he still refuses when the water is genuinely rising, the lawful course is to inform the SDM/Collector, who can direct evacuation under the disaster management framework. Force, if used at all, must be the minimum necessary, in the presence of the revenue officer, recorded in writing, with the reasons, and with arrangements for the cattle. A constable cannot on his own authority drag a citizen out, and a rough eviction will produce a complaint that outlasts the flood. The record I leave - refusal noted, danger explained, remedies offered - is what protects both the farmer and the police.
3. Explain how the physical geography of this basin explains the timing of the peak, and list the agencies whose warning inputs you would depend on.
Read the worked answer
The Mahanadi rises near Sihawa in Dhamtari district and flows through Chhattisgarh before entering Odisha. At Rajim, in Gariaband district, it is joined by the Pairi and the Sondur, so the water arriving at the confluence is the combined discharge of several sub-catchments, not one river. That is why the local gauge can read 3.1 m below danger while the forecast is bad: the rain has fallen upstream and the flood wave is still travelling down.
Three factors make the peak later but higher. First, the catchment rainfall of 180 mm will run off into the Seonath, Pairi and Mahanadi system over the next one to two days. Second, the reservoir release upstream adds a steady, measured volume on top of the rain. Third, at a confluence the receiving river can back up the tributary, so the Sondur and Pairi may rise even before the Mahanadi itself peaks locally. I would therefore expect the danger level to be crossed within a day or so and would not wait for the local gauge to turn.
My inputs would be: IMD district and block rainfall warnings; Central Water Commission gauge and forecast for the Mahanadi; the Water Resources Department's reservoir release schedule; the district emergency operations centre under the Collector; and the village-level information from the patwari and the beat constable. All evacuation decisions are taken by the district administration; the police role is enforcement, traffic and security at the camp.