A family that cannot save: budgeting, an EMI offer and a broken washing machine
The Sharma family - two adults and three children aged 17, 12 and 6 - live in a tier-2 city on a take-home income of ₹46,000 a month. Fixed outgoings are rent ₹9,000, a two-wheeler loan EMI of ₹4,200, school fees of ₹18,000 per quarter and an insurance premium of ₹14,000 a year. They have no emergency fund and ₹35,000 outstanding on two credit cards charged at 36% a year. Last month they spent ₹7,800 on a birthday party and ₹4,600 on food delivery. The father wants a ₹72,000 refrigerator on a 12-month zero interest EMI with a ₹1,500 processing fee. The mother keeps every bill and insists the family simply cannot save. Separately, their washing machine, bought 14 months ago, has failed twice within the warranty period; the dealer says the warranty covers parts only and refuses a free repair.
1. Work out the family's monthly position, identify where the money is actually leaking, and set priorities for the next twelve months.
Read the worked answer
Monthly fixed commitments. Rent 9,000 + vehicle EMI 4,200 + school fees (18,000 ÷ 3) 6,000 + insurance (14,000 ÷ 12) 1,167 = ₹20,367. That leaves ₹25,633 for food, utilities, transport, clothing and everything else - a workable margin for five people.
Why the mother believes there is nothing to save. Last month ₹7,800 went on a party and ₹4,600 on delivery: ₹12,400, or nearly half the discretionary balance, in one month. Add roughly ₹1,050 a month of credit-card interest (36% on ₹35,000 is about ₹12,600 a year). Nothing is being lost to a mysterious shortage; it is being spent in two unplanned lumps.
Test against 50-30-20 on ₹46,000: ₹23,000 needs, ₹13,800 wants, ₹9,200 savings. Fixed costs already consume almost all the needs share, so the savings must come from the wants bucket, not from squeezing food.
Priorities, in order:
- Stop using both cards, pay the minimum now, and clear the ₹35,000 within about four months by redirecting the party and delivery money. At 36%, this is the most expensive money in the household.
- Build an emergency fund of three months of essentials (roughly ₹60,000–65,000) in a recurring deposit or liquid fund.
- Postpone the refrigerator until both above are done; the old machine still runs.
- Put school fees and insurance on a monthly sinking fund so quarterly bills stop feeling like crises.
2. Evaluate the ₹72,000 'zero interest' EMI scheme. Should the family take it now, and what is the effective cost of the offer?
Read the worked answer
The arithmetic. Twelve payments of ₹6,000 plus ₹1,500 upfront means the family repays ₹73,500 for ₹72,000 of goods. The fee looks small, but it is charged on the full amount while the outstanding balance falls every month, so the effective annualised rate is roughly double the flat fee rate: about 2.1% flat becomes approximately 4% a year. That is genuinely cheap money in isolation.
Why that is not the whole answer. A loan is cheap or expensive only relative to the alternatives:
- The family already holds ₹35,000 of debt at 36%. Borrowing at 4% while sitting on 36% debt is a losing trade - every rupee should go to the card first.
- The offer removes the cash discount. Dealers running zero-interest schemes usually refuse the ₹3,000–5,000 discount a cash buyer can negotiate, which can cost more than the fee.
- It commits ₹6,000 a month for a year from a household with no emergency fund. One hospital bill and the EMI is missed, and missed EMIs on a card-linked scheme attract penalties well beyond 4%.
- Such schemes often require a credit card, and theirs is already near the limit.
Judgement: the offer is not a trap on its own terms, but the timing is wrong. Sequence it as: clear the cards → build three months' expenses → then buy, ideally on cash after negotiating a discount, or on the EMI if the discount is not available and the emergency fund is intact. Also read the fine print on processing fee, prepayment charges and late payment interest.
3. The dealer refuses a free repair on the washing machine that has failed twice in 14 months. Set out the family's rights and the exact steps and forum available to them.
Read the worked answer
Start with the document, not the argument. The family should read the warranty card themselves. Dealers often state 'parts only' orally when the card actually covers labour for a period, and in any case a seller cannot contract away statutory rights through an oral claim. Two failures of the same machine within 14 months point to an inherent defect or a deficiency in service, not normal wear.
Rights under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: the right to safety, the right to be informed (including full warranty terms), the right to be heard, the right to seek redressal, and protection against unfair trade practices. Non-disclosure or misrepresentation of warranty terms is itself an unfair trade practice.
Steps, in order:
- Write a dated complaint to the dealer and ask for a written job sheet for both failures. Keep the machine and do not let anyone open it informally.
- Escalate in writing by email to the manufacturer's customer care, quoting the model, invoice number and both job sheets. Email creates a record; phone calls do not.
- If refused, file before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which under the 2019 Act handles claims up to ₹1 crore - this claim belongs there. Filing can be done online through e-Daakhil and does not require a lawyer.
- Note the limitation period of two years from the cause of action, so the clock runs from the refusal, not from the purchase.
Documents to keep: invoice, warranty card, both job sheets, all emails, photographs of the fault, and a note of dates. Relief to ask for: free repair or replacement, compensation for the inconvenience, and litigation costs.