Moderate anaemia at 28 weeks in a remote Saharia hamlet
At a sub-centre in Kishanganj block of Baran district you are the newly posted CHO. The block has a large Saharia tribal population and most families migrate seasonally for work. On a Tuesday morning Sunita, 26, G3P2 at 28 weeks gestation, walks in with breathlessness on climbing one flight of stairs. She stopped her iron tablets two months ago because of 'black stools'. Haemoglobin by haemoglobinometer is 7.2 g/dL. Both her previous deliveries were at home with a dai. She lives 14 km from the PHC, and the last 3 km of the road becomes impassable for bullock carts after rain. Her husband is in Gujarat until March. Her mother-in-law, who came with her, insists hospital delivery is 'for town women'. The nearest facility with blood on the shelf is the district hospital, 46 km away. The sub-centre has 45 registered pregnant women in the second or third trimester and a stock of 900 IFA tablets.
1. Classify Sunita's anaemia, and state what you would do differently in her management because of her distance from the PHC.
Read the worked answer
Hb 7.2 g/dL sits in the 7.0–9.9 band, so this is moderate anaemia; severe anaemia begins below 7.0. The cut-off is not academic - it decides place of treatment. Moderate anaemia is managed at the sub-centre with two IFA tablets daily (120 mg elemental iron) for eight weeks, then a repeat Hb. Severe anaemia needs referral for parenteral iron or transfusion assessment.
But she is not a routine moderate case. She is at 28 weeks, has had two home deliveries, has no adult male at home, lives where the last 3 km fail in rain, and her family resists institutional delivery. Her risk of tipping into severe anaemia and of postpartum haemorrhage is high. So: start double-dose IFA today; explain that black stools are expected and not a reason to stop (this single explanation is what broke her adherence); give albendazole after the first trimester per protocol; review at two weeks with repeat Hb. If Hb has not risen, or she develops breathlessness at rest, refer rather than persist with oral iron. In parallel, fix the delivery plan now - ASHA-linked transport, JSSK entitlements explained to the family, and a documented birth-preparedness plan.
2. Calculate the IFA tablets needed for one month for all 45 registered pregnant women at one tablet daily with a 30% buffer, and convert this into standard 100-tablet bottles. What assumption could break your calculation?
Read the worked answer
Base requirement: 45 women × 1 tablet/day × 30 days = 1,350 tablets. Buffer: 30% of 1,350 = 405 tablets. Total: 1,350 + 405 = 1,755 tablets. Bottles: 1,755 ÷ 100 = 17.55, so indent 18 bottles (1,800 tablets); you cannot indent a fraction of a bottle.
The assumption that breaks this is 'one tablet daily for everyone'. Any woman with moderate anaemia, like Sunita, is on two tablets daily for eight weeks, which adds 30 tablets per woman per month. If, say, 8 of the 45 are on double dose, the requirement becomes (37 × 30) + (8 × 60) = 1,110 + 480 = 1,590, and with 30% buffer 2,067 tablets, i.e. 21 bottles. Also check the 900 tablets already in stock and subtract them before indenting, and follow first-expiry-first-out when the new stock arrives.
3. How would you counsel the mother-in-law without dismissing her, and what would you document afterwards?
Read the worked answer
Arguing about 'town women' will harden her position. Instead, work inside her own frame: she wants a safe delivery and a live grandchild, and the practical risks are the 14 km road and the 46 km to blood. Use the dai she trusts and the ASHA as messengers, because the family will weigh their word above yours. Explain, in plain Hindi, that JSSK makes delivery, drugs, diagnostics and referral transport free at the government facility - the fear is usually cost, not distance. Give a concrete local example of a woman from the same hamlet who delivered at the CHC. Do not promise a doctor or a guarantee; describe the plan: when labour starts, who calls, which vehicle, what the ASHA carries.
Document the counselling date, who was present, the family's stated position, the birth-preparedness plan agreed, and the referral advice given. If the family still refuses, record that the risks were explained and continue home-visit follow-up - the decision may change closer to term.