TEST ARCHED study plan
TEST ARCHED · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Project and Program Fundamentals
Define and distinguish project, program, and portfolio in your own words, mapping each to a real example from your own work history
Explain the role and accountability boundaries of the project manager, program manager, sponsor, and PMO without notes
Diagram the project life cycle and show where phase gates, baselines, and benefits realization sit
Build a one-page glossary of 25 core fundamentals terms with a one-line definition for each
Your checkpoint
A one-page fundamentals glossary plus a hand-drawn life cycle diagram photographed or scanned, both reviewed against your own notes for gaps
Project and Program Fundamentals & Architecture and Solution Design
Compare predictive, iterative, and hybrid delivery approaches and state two selection criteria for each
Describe how organizational structure (functional, matrix, projectized) changes a project manager's authority
Identify the inputs and outputs of architecture and solution design within the delivery life cycle
Write a short argument for which delivery approach fits a project you have actually worked on
Your checkpoint
A two-page comparison table of delivery approaches with a 300-word recommendation memo for a real or realistic project
Architecture and Solution Design
Explain the purpose and structure of an architecture overview, including logical, physical, and deployment views
Distinguish business, data, application, and technology architecture layers and give one artifact for each
Describe how non-functional requirements drive design decisions and where to record them
Outline a design review process including participants, entry criteria, and decision records
Your checkpoint
A one-page architecture overview for a hypothetical system covering all four layers plus three design decisions with rationale
Architecture and Solution Design & Requirements and Scope Definition
Trace a requirement from elicitation through design decision to a verification method
Compare elicitation techniques (interviews, workshops, observation, document analysis) and state when each is strongest
Write three well-formed functional requirements and two non-functional requirements with measurable acceptance criteria
Explain how scope baseline, work breakdown structure, and traceability matrix connect
Your checkpoint
A requirements traceability matrix with at least eight requirements, each linked to a design element and a verification method
Requirements and Scope Definition & Delivery and Implementation Management
Distinguish scope creep from approved change and describe the control that prevents each
Build a work breakdown structure to three levels for a small project and estimate effort per work package
Describe how a delivery schedule, critical path, and resource plan interact
Explain stage-gate or sprint review governance and what decisions are made at each checkpoint
Your checkpoint
A three-level work breakdown structure with effort estimates and a one-page schedule narrative identifying the critical path
Delivery and Implementation Management & Quality Assurance and Verification
Define verification and validation and give two activities that serve each
Design a test approach covering unit, integration, system, and acceptance levels with entry and exit criteria
Describe defect lifecycle states and the metrics that reveal quality trends
Explain how quality gates in delivery reduce rework cost and where they belong in the life cycle
Your checkpoint
A one-page test strategy with entry and exit criteria per test level plus a defect severity and priority matrix
Risk, Change, and Issue Management & Quality Assurance and Verification
Build a risk register with probability, impact, response strategy, and owner for at least ten risks
Distinguish risk, issue, and change and state the correct escalation path for each
Describe a change control board process from request to decision to implementation
Explain how root-cause analysis and lessons learned feed back into risk planning
Your checkpoint
A ten-item risk register with scored exposure, response plans, and owners, plus a one-page change control flow
Stakeholder Communication and Governance & Risk, Change, and Issue Management
Map stakeholders by influence and interest and choose an engagement approach for each quadrant
Draft a status report that distinguishes progress, forecast, risks, and decisions needed
Explain governance structures including steering committee, escalation thresholds, and reporting cadence
Assemble a personal one-page summary of the seven domains with your weakest two flagged for review
Your checkpoint
A one-page stakeholder engagement plan plus a sample status report, followed by a timed 40-question self-test scored and reviewed
Milestones
Week 2: Explain the difference between project, program, and portfolio and justify a delivery approach choice aloud in under five minutes without notes
Week 4: Produce a traceability matrix unaided in 45 minutes and defend each requirement-to-verification link
Week 6: Score at least 70 percent on a self-written 30-question quiz covering domains 1 through 5, and log every missed item with its cause
Week 8: Score at least 80 percent on a timed 40-question mixed-domain self-test and confirm the risk register and stakeholder plan meet the deliverable checklist