LARE Section 4 study materials
LARE Section 4 study resources

Cut, Fill, and the Contractor's Balance Number

LARE Section 4 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Cut, Fill, and the Contractor's Balance Number

A 4.6-acre office site is ready to bid. The contractor's average-end-area takeoff from a 20-ft grid shows 2,400 cy of cut and 1,900 cy of compacted fill. Six inches of topsoil must be stripped from the 1.5-acre building and pavement area and stockpiled for respreading; the geotechnical report classifies that material as unsuitable for structural fill. Proctor testing shows the on-site silty clay shrinks 12 percent when placed and compacted to 95 percent of standard Proctor. There is no room on site to waste soil: import runs $28/cy delivered, and export runs $34/cy plus $1,200 per haul cycle. The proposed finished floor is 2.0 ft above existing grade at the rear property line, where runoff presently sheet-flows onto a neighboring parking lot. The contractor wants to start stripping on Monday and is asking you for a balance number.

1. Does the site balance? Show the calculation and state the net import or export volume, including any assumption you must make about the takeoff.

Read the worked answer

The takeoff was measured to subgrade, so the 6-in strip is inside the 2,400 cy of cut and must be subtracted before any of that material can go to fill.

  • Topsoil: 1.5 ac x 43,560 = 65,340 sf x 0.5 ft = 32,670 cf / 27 = 1,210 cy bank.
  • Structural cut available: 2,400 - 1,210 = 1,190 cy.
  • Fill demand in bank measure: 1,900 / (1 - 0.12) = 2,159 cy, because 12 percent of the excavated volume is lost to compaction.
  • Net: 1,190 - 2,159 = -969 cy, so roughly 970 cy of import (about 1,100 cy loose).

Two cautions before anything is ordered. A 20-ft grid is typically plus or minus 10 percent, which is about 240 cy on this takeoff, so no import decision should rest on a single number. And the 1,210 cy of stockpiled topsoil will not fully respread if it is handled twice; plan on 10 percent loss and a small topsoil import. Ask for a supplemental cross-section check through the building pad before Monday.

2. The contractor proposes lowering the building pad 1.0 ft and steepening the rear slope from 3:1 to 2:1 to close the deficit. Evaluate the proposal and recommend a course of action.

Read the worked answer

Quantify first. A 25,000 sf footprint lowered 1.0 ft reduces fill demand by 25,000 cf / 27, about 926 cy, which nearly cancels the 969 cy deficit, but only if the finished floor can drop. Check three things before approving it: finished floor at least 1 ft above the seasonal high water table and above any flood protection elevation; positive gravity flow from the pad to the storm system; and the resulting grade at the rear line. Dropping 1 ft also cuts the differential to the neighbor from 2.0 ft to 1.0 ft, which helps the off-site drainage complaint.

The 2:1 slope is the weaker half of the idea. At a 2-ft differential it saves only 2 ft of horizontal width compared with 3:1, it is at the practical limit for safe mowing, and in silty clay it needs permanent reinforcement and a flatter shoulder. Recommendation: authorize stripping and stockpiling, keep 3:1 or 4:1 at the property line, take the volume from the pad if the floor elevation checks out, and hold the import order until cross-sections confirm the grid.